From "The Three Faces of Eve", Thigpen and Cleckey, 1957 (p. 137):
"If learned people in our own time can gather and, through the
nonsensical rites of dianetics (sic), work themselves into the
conviction that they have recaptured memories from previous existences
before the birth of Christ, how could we be confident that our own
interest and enthusiasm had not contributed a great deal to what we
seemed to be observing?"
"The Three Faces of Eve" is one of the most famous clinical studies of
multiple personality disorder. In this passage, the authors discuss
the suspicion that their own bias coupled with the growing prevalence
of psychiatric "pseudo science" could be producing or affecting the
manifestations of multiple personalities in the patient, Eve White.
Prefaced by a quote from Bernheim, "when a physician employs hypnosis
with a patient it is wise always to be aware of who may be hypnotizing
whom", the passage indicates that most practitioners of science or
pseudoscience color the proceedings merely by their own subliminal
emotional cues to the patient.
In the case of Dianetics as practiced by the book at that time, the
auditor by movement or changes in vocal tone involuntarily indicates
approval to the preclear, causing him or her to try to augment the
phenomenon that produced the response. The converse applies with
disapproval when the preclear acts unfavorably. This implies not
conscious fraud but only the fallacy inherent in all such methods of
analysis. The dianeticist of that time, working from a book and not
having years of schooling behind him, was probably more prone to this
fallacy than others. Presumably the TR courses are meant to prevent
this; however, it is impossible to rid oneself fully of reaction.
Plus, the shallowness of affect displayed by those who have completed
the TR courses can be compared to that shown by schizophrenics and
sociopaths.
--
Lianna Skywalker
http://freespeech.org/liannaskywalker