A Concerned Critic wrote:
> In article <9bvonc$snc$1@uranium.btinternet.com>, "Ian says...
>> this is not an 'anti-religious group'. Have a nice day.
> Of course I'm interested in improving our image. But I also worry about the
> possibilty of going too far; I think it would be wrong if we started to deny our
> very identity.
no, you miss the point. I'll type this next bit slowly so you can
follow it.
t h i s
i s
n o t
a n
' a n t i - r e l i g i o u s
g r o u p'
I'm not anti-religion (although I am an atheist/humanist), the critics
who post here are not on the whole anti-religion.
We oppose the ABUSIVE PRACTICES of the church.