Today, I was just bubbling with news, until I read ARS. Then I didn't feel so special any more.

1. Phineas Fogg is mysteriously signed up to an Islamic newsletter.

2. Valerie Emmanuel's boss receives a letter from Mafia lawyer Abelson, accusing her of impropriety in the post office.

3. I receive a visit yesterday from two detectives of the Criminal Intelligence Unit, which handles domestic terrorism. They were investigating a complaint from...guess who? Emails were mentioned, supposedly posted by me, discussing fertilizer and fuel oil. I was asked several times if I wanted or planned to blow up our local org. I think these will be very good connections for future information campaigns.

OSA, I'm afraid this is another footbullet for you. I didn't even know there WAS a "Criminal Intelligence Unit." Happily, you led them right to my door, ya stupid fucks! Moreover, thanks to your idiotic spasm of forged posts a while back, anything you show law enforcement which appears to be from critics will get exactly the attention they deserve after the cops are shown some of your former forgeries.

Can you get any stupider, you Earth Worm-Babies? I don't think so, but I've learned not to be suprised. I was actually concerned when talking to the detectives at first. Thought it was about the prostitutes using our street as an office, or maybe the recent complaint I made about taggers in the hood. But, when they mentioned Scientology, I burst out laughing and invited them in. :-P

--

Rev. Barb
Church of Xenu, San Diego
Chaplain, ARSCC
http://members.cox.net/bwarr1/index.htm

"$cientology sees the world this way: One man with a picket sign: terrorism. Five thousand people dead in a deliberate inferno: business opportunity.

$cientology oozes _under_ terrorists to hide." -Chris Leithiser

From: idaj007@aol.com (IDA J 007)
Date: 28 Nov 2002 21:31:40 GMT
Subject: Re: cult actions against critics
Message-ID: <20021128163140.13996.00000172@mb-fm.aol.com>

Barbz when the cult decided I was a SP ,I lived in a gated community. So when they couldn't do me they sent two pickets to where my husband was employed. That backfired too as there were two fellows there going for the Dianetic courses. Both quit that day. There were 500 employees throughout the system and all got the messge We heard there were others that were also going for the hook and quit when they heard what they did to my husband. There was more to come for him but that is another story which oddly enough made him understand why I had taken the path that I chose. You can send those gentlemen to my place if you like Barb, I too would invite them in --serve them coffee and a Snickerdoodle and we could talk.

Ida J. Camburn

"It's too bad there isn't a 20th Century Charles Dickens to write about the terrible destruction of these 20th Century Fagins who make themselves rich while the destroy the psyche of so many". --- Leo J. Ryan, Member of Congress

The detectives I spoke with mentioned emails, supposedly from me, which talked about fuel oil and fertilizer. They made sure to note that they had NOT seen the "original" emails. I write of harpy eagles, not fuel oil.

The cult wouldn't stoop to forging emails in my name now, would they? I mean, what kind of behavior is THAT for a "religion?" --
Rev. Barb
Church of Xenu, San Diego
Chaplain, ARSCC
http://members.cox.net/bwarr1/index.htm

"$cientology sees the world this way: One man with a picket sign: terrorism. Five thousand people dead in a deliberate inferno: business opportunity.

$cientology oozes _under_ terrorists to hide." -Chris Leithiser

Message-ID: <3DEACDD8.A374C9A2@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 19:04:56 -0800
From: barb <bwarr1@cox.net>
Subject: For the Record

I have no intention of vandalizing or blowing up any "church" of Scientology.

I don't have the means, the knowledge, or the ability to blow up anything other than a balloon. I think that Scientologists, for all their obnoxiousness, are victims of a destructive cult. The reason I speak out against the abuses of Scientology is to hopefully prevent naive people from falling into that stinking pit that hides behind a cloak of religiousity.

Knowing what I know about Scientology, it's practically a civic duty to speak out. Ghod nose, the damned authorities aren't going to protect people from this scam! -- Rev. Barb Church of Xenu, San Diego Chaplain, ARSCC http://members.cox.net/bwarr1/index.htm

"$cientology sees the world this way: One man with a picket sign: terrorism. Five thousand people dead in a deliberate inferno: business opportunity.

$cientology oozes _under_ terrorists to hide." -Chris Leithiser

From: HR-Defense@aol.com (Shy David)
Subject: Re: For the Record
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 03:23:34 GMT
Organization: -NONE-
Message-ID: <3dead25c@news2.lightlink.com>

On Sun, 01 Dec 2002 19:04:56 -0800, barb <bwarr1@cox.net> wrote:

> I have no intention of vandalizing or blowing up any "church" of
> Scientology.

In the 6 or 7 years I've read this newsgroup, I've yet to read anyone who has suggested or proposed any such thing (other than anonymous OSA sock puppets).

> I don't have the means, the knowledge, or the ability to blow up
> anything other than a balloon. I think that Scientologists, for all
> their obnoxiousness, are victims of a destructive cult. The reason I
> speak out against the abuses of Scientology is to hopefully prevent
> naive people from falling into that stinking pit that hides behind a
> cloak of religiousity.
>
> Knowing what I know about Scientology, it's practically a civic duty to
> speak out. Ghod nose, the damned authorities aren't going to protect
> people from this scam!

George "Baby Butcher" Bush claims he wants every USA citizen to give 4,000 hours of community service in their life-time (I'm already WAYYYY past that, and I'm only 40 years old). Protesting against Scientology's crimes and human rights abuses seems like an excellent way to do this.

(As if Bush ever put in a single *HOUR*)

> --
> Rev. Barb
> Church of Xenu, San Diego
> Chaplain, ARSCC
> http://members.cox.net/bwarr1/index.htm

---- View ancient (and modern) desert petroglyphs: http://desertphile.org

Message-ID: <3DEAFA54.77BDD35@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 22:14:44 -0800
From: barb <bwarr1@cox.net>
Subject: Re: For the Record

Fluffygirl wrote: >
> "barb" <bwarr1@cox.net> wrote in message news:3DEACDD8.A374C9A2@cox.net...
> > I have no intention of vandalizing or blowing up any "church" of
> > Scientology.
> > I don't have the means, the knowledge, or the ability to blow up
> > anything other than a balloon. I think that Scientologists, for all
> > their obnoxiousness, are victims of a destructive cult.
>
> If you really thought they were "victims" you'd show some measure of
> empathy.
>
> but you don't.
>
> So, your rather high flown statements as written are not credible.
>
> C

Oh, what a load of lunchmeat, claire. Your "if...then" scenario is totally spurious. I empathize with the truly suckered, whether they've invested with Greed Slatkin, fallen for a Nigerian scam, or believe the codswallop spewed out by your dead con man hero Hubbard.

I pity Scientologists for their greed and gullibility. That doesn't mean I like them, especially that phony superior act and smarmy smugness so many of them trade their money for. I have no patience with determined stupidity. The goal of sooperdooper powerzz is always just one more expensive course away, but they're too deluded to see through the con, thanks to Hubbard's incredibly effective program which paralyzes rational thought and replaces it with hollow aphorisms and fake "concern" for humanity.

If it works, you credit Hubbard. If it doesn't work, you did it wrong. <snort> Scientology takes perfectly good people, scoops 'em out, and replaces them with a Hubbardesque pod person, a mini-Ron, complete with LaRon's vicious disregard and contempt for society and people.

You want to know what "high flown statements" aren't credible? Read the Scientologist's Creed. Now there's a real joke, and Hubbo laughed all the way to the bank on it. -- Rev. Barb Church of Xenu, San Diego Chaplain, ARSCC http://members.cox.net/bwarr1/index.htm

"$cientology sees the world this way: One man with a picket sign: terrorism. Five thousand people dead in a deliberate inferno: business opportunity.

$cientology oozes _under_ terrorists to hide." -Chris Leithiser

Message-ID: <3DEB001D.4264D6D5@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 22:39:25 -0800
From: barb <bwarr1@cox.net>
Subject: Re: For the Record

Fluffygirl wrote: >
> "ptsc" <ptsc AT nym DOT cryptofortress DOT com> wrote in message
> news:9fpluuo4s50shp2uj87hpp3ccevlh9apmb@4ax.com...
>
> My god that was quick.
>
> >
> > So you're attacking her now for old posts instead of dealing with the post
> she
> > made just today?
>
> I wasn't attacking her. And the posts aren't old.
>
> She wrote me something - on this forum- a couple days ago. I would not
> consider that to be "old".
>
> And also today.
>
> Again, not "old". Just the latest in a long chain of such events, all the
> same. The same a year ago and the same ~today~.
>
> I do not believe her claims as to how she views Scn'ists because of the way
> she speaks to ANY Scn'ist whenever she encounters any on this ng. If saying
> so is "attacking" then I guess every expression of disagreement with anybody
> is automatically attacking.
>
> Unlike Barb (just a couple days ago) - I did not level any labels or insults
> toward her. I said I didn't believe what she said and I said why. She did
> the same with me only with some name calling thrown in. Two days ago. With
> some sharp commentary about me today. Well, she can. It's usenet.
>
> And if I spot something she says that's inconsistent with other events, I am
> just as free to mention it.
>
> Apparently the idea is that if something bad or stressful or unfair happens
> to someone that no one can express disagreement with that person or her
> tactics until, what- it all blows over?
>
> Well, I'm truly truly very sorry that those loons in the church harassed
> her. That's the sort of thing I would like to stop. And which I'll never
> endorse.
>
> But I'm not sorry I pointed out the inconsistencies of Barb's stated stance
> re Scn'ists. I didn't realize the background there and it's obvious that I
> was not referring to all Scn'ists and saying that Barb should turn the other
> cheek.
>
> Harassment of Barb by CofS does not change or excuse anything Barb does in
> regard to people who weren't party to such actions.
>
> Just as if someone in the church did something nice for Barb, it would be
> idiotic to tell her to assume all Scn'ists were nice.
>
> They aren't me and I'm not them.
>
> My only regret about what I said was the timing. But I stand by the
> substance of what I said. Because my comment had nothing to do with those
> other events and any attempts to make it so are irrelevant.
>
> C

You just don't get it, do you? Those "nice people" who shove their dough into Scn's gaping maw are FUNDING the type of harassment you like to gloss over. There's a direct connection there, which your HubbardVision(tm) prevents you from acking. This is a point I have made repeatedly.

Shouldn't you be packing instead of rabidly responding ten times to every post? Weren't you going somewhere? Is it a tech thing that has conditioned you to do this hyper responding? Or do you just have some clinging need to get the last word in? One wonders that you haven't developed carpal tunnel syndrome to go with your bovine spongiforme RonHubbardopathy. -- Rev. Barb Church of Xenu, San Diego Chaplain, ARSCC http://members.cox.net/bwarr1/index.htm

"$cientology sees the world this way: One man with a picket sign: terrorism. Five thousand people dead in a deliberate inferno: business opportunity.

$cientology oozes _under_ terrorists to hide." -Chris Leithiser

From: "roger gonnet" <gonnet@antisectes.net>
Subject: Re: Scientology foirging threats against itself - more
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 10:38:46 +0100
Organization: xenufrance
charset="iso-8859-1" Message-ID: <3deb2a23$0$20705$626a54ce@news.free.fr>

"Shy David" <HR-Defense@aol.com> a écrit dans le message de news: 3deaa6b5$1@news2.lightlink.com... > Barb mentioned yet another instance of Scientology Inc. creating
> internet-related "threats" against itself. Is anyone keeping tract of
> these?
>
> ----
> View ancient (and modern) desert petroglyphs: http://desertphile.org

besides of Introvigne, it should be noted that I was accused and a complaint launched by clams on charges of "threats of destruction and blackmail" for a joke on internet (I won that one), and later, I lost for a similar joke against Moxon the criminal attorney, where I was sentenced to pay 300 euros damages to moxon for "insults" and "incitation to commit a crime not followed of a result". Well, I have been unable to show the judge how much it was an evident joke of "Helena, why don't ye k... Moxon ;-)" . But one can really consider that the crime cult used that like if it was a real incitation to kill Moxon, which was certainly not true.

Besides, if i would ask to anyone to kill anyone, I would'nt do it publicly, and would certainly not ask the best friend and associate of someone to do it - it's why i say it was a faed attempt of the crime cult to make believe into internet-related threats etc. So, the judges have been abused by the form, and I've been an asshole to defend like I did, but the criminal assholes in scientology won't take it to the tomb. They hope to shut my big mouth with such? no way.

.

roger

From: HR-Defense@aol.com (Shy David)
Subject: Barb's being framed. www.narconon-exposed.org
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 01:27:07 GMT
Organization: -NONE-
Message-ID: <3deab711@news2.lightlink.com>

The sinister Scientology business attempted to frame Barb for "threatening e-mails" probably because she was looking into the narCONon scam that is moving in to San Diego County. If the law enforcement officers manage to acquire copies of these "e-mails" perhaps we can see the link beteen narCONon and this act of domestic terrorism: a Good Thing, since it will help educate people about the front group.

And be sure to visit www.narconon-exposed.org

---- View ancient (and modern) desert petroglyphs: http://desertphile.org

Go Back