From: BarbaraSchwarz@excite.com (Barbara Schwarz)
Subject: I donate a bar of soap for Skepic Tank Owner Frederic Rice
Date: 30 Jun 2003 12:25:04 -0700
Message-ID: <8385d874.0306301125.6cba7f1f@posting.google.com>

Frederic Rice just referred me to a dirty picture, a really dirty picture of him on his website.

I noticed that he asks on that site also for donations.

I sure can donate something I have of plently. A bar of soap, that he can share with his lousy twin brother. They really need it.

My question is: Why are the Scientology attackers so dirty?

Barbara Schwarz

From: BarbaraSchwarz@excite.com (Barbara Schwarz)
Subject: Part 83: BarbaraSchwarz reveals shocking news!
Date: 5 Jul 2003 10:00:33 -0700
Message-ID: <8385d874.0307050900.68cb4139@posting.google.com>

The saga continues and perhaps there will be never an end to it, but you can always killfile me, it's very alright with me.

RB mailed me more information, a copy of a letter from Munich attorney Michael Reiss, dated March 23, 1988, R/a, re: Pflegschaftssache (Guardianship case) Barbara Schwarz, addressed to Rosemarie Bretschneider in Munich. (Note, I got successfully rid of the wrongfully guardianship case in spring 1986.)

Reiss wrote that he ordered the files on me from the Vormundschaftsgericht in Munich, the Guardianshipcourt, (yes, they have a whole court there to declare adults wrongfully incapacitated to care for their own affairs, to control them, to deny them their rights) on matter of Barbara Schwarz and that he was notified to better come with a vehicle, because that case would have a mountain of files. (Of course it has, because so many corrupt people were involved in denying my rights and trying to "deprogram" me of Scientology.)

Reiss acknowledged that he met RB on March 22, 1988 and that he had considered to take the case. (I have no clue what RB exactly wanted from him, what kind of case he thought he would take. Fanatically as she is, she probably wanted to put me again under guardianship, because never got used to it that I grew up and made my own decision.

She sort of wanted me to sit in her living room all my life playing with dolls, because it's RB who is not right in mind.)

Anyway, Reiss wrote to RB that after he was notified how huge the case is and how voluminious the files, that he decided not to take the case, but rather refered her to another lawyer. (He did not mention that lawyer with name.) He wrote he has not the time to work himself through so many files. He also claimed personal reasons why he thinks that him taking the case will not make sense. - He offered RB her files back and the Power of Attorney, that she gave to him.

RB also mailed me a copy of a decree, a decision (Bescheid) of the Staatsanwaltschaft bei dem Landgericht Muenchen I, which is the District Attorney of the Country Court I, in Munich, in Lindprunstrasse. That document is dated February 2, 1990, Geschaeftsnumber, file no: 301 Js 21 221/89. That is on a penal complaint that RB filed against Walter Bistritzki (my ex-Guardian) on November 26, 1989. The decree was issued by district attorney Gruppenleiter Alt, certified on February 8, 1990 by justice employee Kappelmeier. They decided to dismiss her penal complaint against Bistritzki as unspecific, that RB just claimed that Bistritzki was involved in fraud and never stated any details.

RB wrote that the D/A lied, that she was specific. She mailed me a copy of her objection to the decree, dated February 20, 1990, that she sent via D/A employee Dehne to D/A Alt. But in the objection she does not go in details as to what kind of specifics she had claimed in the original complaint and she did not mail me a copy of the original complaint.

However, she mentioned in her objection also to D/A Alt also another decree on another penal complaint of hers that she had filed against German Scientology attorney Wilhelm Bluemel and the D/A issued a decree on that on February 7, 1990. The file number is not mentioned in RB's objection. In her objection of matter against Bluemel she claimed that the district attorney did not investigate the facts that Bluemel forged my signatures on power of attorneys. (She has a point on Bluemel, I found him to represent me without my knowledge and without any POA.)

Bluemel apparently had claimed that he got a blanco POA from me, but I never gave Bluemel a blanco POA. RB got hold of a letter that I mailed to Bluemel on December 16, 1987, a month after the kidnapping and "deprogramming" in Herrsching, in which I wrote that I don't want him to represent me, because he was talking to RB, one of the deprogrammer, and he told her that the "deprogramming" was my(!) fault, because if I would be no Scientologist, there would be no need to deprogram me. - That really did it for me! I cancelled the POA on December 16, 1987 and never signed a new one for him. All those dated later are sure a forgery.

I gave a blanco POA to American detective Krywucki in summer 1988, who worked for SCN, because I needed some papers from Germany, but I made clear to him that I don't want Bluemel on the matter. It was no case, just a simple administrative matter and I told the detective that I want attorney Ulli Buehler to get those papers for me. Looks to me that Bluemel got hold of that POA against my will. He also did not get the papers. Instead of writing to the government agency that issued the documents, he wrote to RB to provide it, who never would have given him the documents anyway, and she traced me down in the USA even more. Whatever Bluemel did in my matters, he never made anything right, just worse.

I also supect that Bluemel represented me without POA in the case that was filed behind my back against Marty Rathbun, and that very much to the disadvantage of Marty and myself. There is a reason why Bluemel, the SCN (!)attorney of all people in the world, wanted me to be institutionalized in 1989. The reason why he wanted it is because I claimed that he represented me without my consent and knowledge and has no true Scientology interests at heart.

Anyway, in her objection, RB cited somebody with name Riepertinger to the D/A who must have done also some illegal activities in regards of me, but as with so many people, who mingled in my life, I don't know him. I have no recollection that I ever met this person and what he wanted and why he did not mind his own business and why RB wanted him criminally investigated by the D/A.

RB asked the D/A to put the case on ice, because of her Asthma. She sent him a statement from her Lung doctor, Christian Bleek in Munich, dated May 18, 1993, in which he altered his statement of April 21, 1993 (Aenderungsbescheid) and certified that RB is seriously Asthma-sick and that this is 90% handicap in her life.

It's true, she is terribly Asthma-sick, but it never stopped her to butt in my life and burn it down. However, RB would have been never become so fanatically if the German government, the SCN attackers and the media would have not run the criminal campaign against SCN and L.

Ron Hubbard, but ignoring on the other side the lies of the SCN attacker and the criminal infiltrators that the German secret services sent in the orgs to mess things up and create the situations.

Read also installment 84 in this series.

Barbara Schwarz,
July 5, 2003

From: BarbaraSchwarz@excite.com (Barbara Schwarz)
Subject: Part 84: Barbara Schwarz reveals shocking news!
Date: 5 Jul 2003 11:09:42 -0700
Message-ID: <8385d874.0307051009.2f854c3e@posting.google.com>

RB furthermore sent me a copy of a letter dated May 30, 1985 from law firm Dr. Walter Bistritzki, Karl Heinz Prinz zu Hohenlohe-Oehringen, in Munich, that Bistritzki wrote to SCN attorney Wilhelm Bluemel. I never saw that letter before, and I wonder how RB got the copy.

Bistritzki wrote that he is my guardian and that the Landgericht Munich I (Country court) decided on May 9, 1985 that the guardianship is limited on where I have to stay and what medication to take. (Fact is that they also made the decision that I am not allowed to determine about my own finances! But they had no objection to anything else. I was allowed to work out my own pleadings, to fight as my own attorney in court, get a job, change my job, divorce Juergen, etc, which made that guardianship of course look completely false, phoney and ridiculous. If I was able to do all above, I was also able to determine where I want to live, what I want to do with my finances and refuse psycho drugs.)

Bistritzki wrote to Bluemel that psych Kapfhammer (read the former installments of this series to be informed what kind of unprofessional pigstable that psych's clinic was) layed out that I have to undergo psychotherapy, but that Bistritzki doesn't want me to force me against my will to see a psych, that's why Bluemel should inform me about this, if I want to do the therapy and if I want to choose a psych whom I trust.

Bluemel never showed me the letter nor talked to me about. He also was only the SCN lawyer and not my attorney. I would have not gone to a psych anyway, no mood to waste my time with those corrupt dilletants.

I saw enough of them in the University Clinic of Hippius, Nedopil, Mende and Kapfhammer to know what a bunch of dirty criminals they are.

I never forget the dirty grin in the face of Kapfhammer when one of the committed women ran naked after him. The psychs needed the therapy a lot more than I ever did, and they also ruined my kidneys, and some of the stuff they gave me against my rather caused terror than making healthy. I had enough of the emotional and physical medical injection rape by the psychs. I rather concentrated to get rid of the guardianship, with which I succeeded in spring of 1986.

RB was apparently upset about Bistritzki that he did not force me to undergo psychiatric treatments and "deprogramming", which was the sole reason why she and criminal DA Keltsch and other SCN attackers put me under it. She wrote that Josef Beneken (RB's loyal partner in crimes) and she talked to Bistritzki for hours, gave him Info Heinemann's files and "informed him" about SCN and why SCN should be burned out of me. (Heinemann, Beneken and RB are really same kind of nuts cases, completely screwed anarchists.)

If Heinemann would have gotten the Guardianship over me, as he wanted to and applied for, I probably would have been destroyed by those fanatics, who wanted to get a "program" out, which did not exist in me. They just wanted to make another kind of person out of me, a criminal one, as John Mathewson, who was deprogrammed and continued with the criminal acts and deprogrammed others, including kidnapped and abuse me later.(But it did not work. I survived 8 months "deprogramming" in a nuthouse and continued to stay a sane Scientologist.)

RB also mailed me a document from a hearing against my deprogrammers, Vosper, Matheson and Reynolds of December 23, 1987, before judge Wanner and justice employee Schoenach, which indicates that attorneys with name Bockhornie and Fischer Rhon was involved in the case. RB did not mail me the complete decision/decree/judgment, just a part of it, but I conclude it was case 2 Ls 42 Js 34631/87, in Weilheim. The odd thing about the Germans is that they shift the cases to other districts and towns to cover things up, to make it difficult for the witnesses and the people that have a justified interest to go there.

I never was in Weilheim and the crimes against me were not committed in Weilheim. RB wrote, she was there, but she was not allowed to be in the courtroom, she had to wait outside.

I was on the run, I had to leave Germany, because the German authorities arrsted only the men, did not arrest RB (what she truly would have deserved) but let her go and she immediately continued to persecute me with her deprogramming ideas and plans).

She explained to me that many people were involved in the plan to kidnap and deprogram me, not only she and the three men, that it was Friedrich Wilhelm Haack, the lutheran "priest", who told her about it and that it is an option, a Frau Zopel or Zoeple and a Meyer in Leverkusen, Ingo Heinemann and certainly also Ralph Mucha in Duesseldorf, through "FAIRS", the "deprogramming"-business of Cyrill Vosper.(And how fair those people in there, you won't believe it, my scars in my hands often still hurt, and as soon as somebody is locking a door, I am getting real nervous.)

RB reminded me that I also filed some penal complaints to the German District Attorneys in 1989, which is correct. Those are about fraud, of German companies for which I worked and which did not pay me for my work, against the Noris Bank that defrauded by arbitraily booking money from my account and not registering the deposit money that I paid in on my own account, and against Scientology infiltrator, Guenter Wessel, who also defrauded me for several thousand Marks. Yes, and I also recall that the German D/A dismissed the complaints, despite that the fraud was very detailed documented in my complaints.

She reminded me that I filed complaint 252 Js 50498/89 (Staatsanwaltschaft Munich I), AZ 301 Js17090/89 (D/A Denne), AZ Lue 3495/87, (STA LG Munich II), 32N 398/88 and 323 E383/89 Reg 6/98, Amtsgericht Munich, AZ VII AR 518/89, VII AR 518/89, RB 3-AR-2BO963/89 and GzII-1899/89 (STA LG Munich I and II) and there are several more.

The big cases with the mountains of files are however 301 Js 14070/84 LG Munich I, Js 34631/87 and 2 Ls 42 Js 34631/87, AZ Lue 3495/87, LG Munich 2, 1 Ds 42 Js 36187/87 Starnberg, Strafgericht, but there are of course a lot more too.

Can anybody in the world really blame me that I left Germany and don't want to put my foot anymore on German ground?