On March 6, 2003, I e-mailed a request for records under the federal FOIA and the California state records laws for the records on L. Ron Hubbard and cornoner file 8936, to jgolls@co.slo.ca.us, webmaster@co.slo.ca.us, slocooesa@fix.net, help_desk@co.slo.ca.us, webmaster@co.slo.ca.us and rdonalies@co.slo.ca.us. (Rdonalies replied not more working for the Sheriff's Office, so I took that address of my list.)

Everybody on this list illegally ignored my request, that was addressed to Sheriff Patrick Hedges, personal. On March 15, 2003, I re-mailed the request to all above and asked the Sheriff Office to finally acknowledge the receipt of this request. With date stamp March 21, 2003, I received an envelope from the Office of Sheriff/Coroner of San Luis Obispo, no cover letter added, only seven pages inside on file 8936.

I studied the papers and on March 27, 2003, I mailed an objection to above mentioned e-mail addresses, for Sheriff Hedges, with following arguments:

That they must have more records in this file than just seven pages, that I received only the cornoner information sheet, the investigation report, the report on post mortem examination and the toxicology report, that following records were missing: The certificate of religious belief; the 13 photos of the dead body; the fingerprints that Dr. Kirschner took, but also those that attorney Peterson brought, and any other fingerprints; L. Ron Hubbard's last wills and the testament of 1982, 1983 and 1986; the 1983 Codicil; the news releases that are mentioned in the investigation; the U.S. Navy Certificate of Satisfactory Service Card; the Special Officer Identification Card; copy of the passport; and any other documents pertaining to L. Ron Hubbard.

I informed the Sheriff that I noticed that the Coroner could not examine the bladder of the deceased person, because the bladder was removed by somebody. I asked who removed it and why.

I also wrote to the Sheriff, that I noticed that Det. Feierabend's phonecall to the FBI to determine that the fingerprints match was not appropriate. I also pointed out that fingerprints can be forged.

I requested any other records on L. Ron Hubbard that they sofar have not mailed to me, and asked them also if they have any records on me, Barbara Schwarz.

I furthermore informed Sheriff Hedges, that I am certain that the dead body of January 1986 was not L. Ron Hubbard, but an impostor.

I received no response by anybody of the Sheriff's Office. On April 22, 2003, I wrote a nudge to the Sheriff and those e-mail addresses as listed above.

On April 22, 2003, Sheriff Patrick Hedges slosheriff@fix.net, wrote an e-mail to all mentioned above, but not to me. He did not think that I would get a copy of his e-mail.

In this April 22, 2003, Hedges, twisted the law, by telling those others more or less that FOIA/PA or California records laws don't need to be upheld, and that I would be no person who has any rights to those laws, by trying to discredit me. He wrote that he would "apologize" to the others, being "bothered continually" by me, and that "probably most have already decided, that it would be not necessary to take any actions on my request". He attached as information for the other something he found on me on the web, which is the unresearched article of a private citizen, Steven Aftergood, a conspiracy theorist, that can't make his homework and wrote a blistering hate article about my legal cases (to which he has no clue) in his SECRECY NEWS. Steven Aftergood is so biased and one-sided that he did not even think it was necessary to contact me for imput to his article.

This Sheriff is completely out of line. He has to obay to federal and state laws, he should know better than referring to a private citizen's hate campaign against me. It doesn't matter how much others hate your guts, people, a governmental office is not allowed to participate. They have to grant your request for records and have to stick to the law.

Here is my conclusion: Sheriff Hedges knew that the man who died in 1986 was not L. Ron Hubbard, it was Jack Marshall, the imposter. Ron was murdered secretly already in May 1984. Sheriff Hedges appears to know that, this is why he doesn't want me to get more documents, he is afraid, I puzzle everything together and prove it.

Fingerprints can be forged. But it could be even possible that the fingerprints indeed matched, but they were always only Jack's and not Ron's. In other words, those prints that the FBI had, were already those of Jack and not Ron's. The FBI had never any fingerprints from Ron. Why should they? Many FBI offices wrote to me they did not even consider him ever a target for electronical surveillance. Also, what strange procedure is that to check up that fingerprints fit over the phone?

Did it work like this?

"Hey, Buddy, from the FBI, I have some lines in those prints, you too?" "Yes, Sheriff-Dude, I saw some too, so it must be L. Ron Hubbard."

And what is with the bladder of the imposter? Who cut this thing out? Bladders don't just take a hike on their own. Did Dr. Denk do it, or the Broekers? Who else? How can you get a dead body without a bladder in it and not be surprised?

There is so much criminal activity in that case. If the Church of Scientology would be not so terrible infiltrated by non-Scientologists, they would have screamed "foul" right from the start.

And I don't even want to mention the odd thing with the wills and the change of the will, the day, before the imposter died. I also don't think he just died. I think he was murdered too. People should think it is L. Ron Hubbard, that is why he was killed the day the Space Shuttle exploded, to keep the attention of the media on something every else. Those that killed the real L. Ron Hubbard in 1984 and the imposter in 1986 did not want anybody to nose around, the way I do it.

Barbara Schwarz

<p><hr><p> From: BarbaraSchwarz2222@hotmail.com (BarbaraSchwarz)
Subject: Re: BarbaraSchwarz impervious to logic!
Date: 28 Apr 2003 09:08:00 -0700
Message-ID: <a6bc00a0.0304280808.2a65e46@posting.google.com>

ShyDavid wrote in message news:<3eac2641@news2.lightlink.com>... > On Sat, 26 Apr 2003 10:51:35 -0700, barb <bwarr1@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > BarbaraSchwarz wrote:
>
> [Lots of psycho schizo ravings]
>
>
> > > You are the person that started to attack me, I did not even know of
> > > you. You tried to deny my right for free speech on Google by starting
> > > to open a campaign against me. I documented all the libel and slander
> > > you use on me.
>
> Truth isn't libel. Truth isn't slander.
>
> > > You also try to put words in my mouth that I never said.
>
> > Proof?
>
> She doesn't have any.
>
> > > I also would sue you, if you would succeed with denying my free
> > > speech, and you would lose that in a landslide.
>
> "Free speech" doesn't include the right to accure Xenu-Barb of treason
> and prohibition drug use.
>
> > Pay attention, Babs. My comments about your mental state stem from your
> > own posts about ear implants, etc, coupled with your weird legal
> > history. Your own record of litigious behavior, and your queer rants
> > about Hubbard, Eisenhower, Nazi controllers, ear implants and Marty
> > Rathbun (de Rothschilde) are your worst liability.
>
> I'll happily provide to the Salt Lake City Library a print-out of
> Psycho-Barb's contributions to this newsgroup (I've been collecting
> them since December 2002). Mentioning the opinion that Psych-Barb is
> crazy is about as "slanderous" and "libelous" as mentioning the
> opinion that the sun appears to rise in the east every morning.
>
> 1,951 03-20-02 6:05p schwarzsm.htm
> 224,642 12-02-02 11:32a barbara-schwarz.htm
> 281,706 12-21-02 3:30p barbara-schwarz2.htm
> 156,763 01-03-03 7:33p barbara-schwarz3.htm
> 189,226 01-27-03 5:46p BarbaraSchwarz3.htm
> 13,942 02-16-03 12:37a barbaraschwarz4.htm
> 51,989 03-03-03 10:23p BarbaraSchwarz5.htm
> 461,224 04-27-03 11:36a BarbaraSchwarz6.htm
>
> > The accusations you have made against me are based on nothing but your
> > own imagination, are groundless and defamatory. You know nothing
> > tangible about my military or personal history.
>
> I seems to me that Psycho-Barb has been attacking Xenu-Barb out of a
> sense of jealousy. Psycho-Barb is filled with angst that ANOTHER
> *BARB* is posting to the newsgroup.
>
> >> Remember also that: Nobody here likes addicted smokers, Barb Graham.
>
> Psycho-Barb first accused Xenu-Barb of smoking a drug other than
> tobacco: a drug that is illegal in the USA to posess.
>
> > > This here is Utah, and honestly, as I know the librarians here, they
> > > would be appalled by your kind of language.
>
> LOL!
>
> > Who says I'm addicted? I can quit any time I want to! (lol)
> > I'm sure my language appalls a number of people, but it's personal
> > expression and doesn't reflect on you or anyone else. Your language is
> > libellous, not to mention rancorous and delusional, and appears to be
> > something out of your control.
>
> Alas, I am not convinced that Psycho-Barb is harmless.
>
> > I am not trying to deny your right to free speech. I reiterate, you do
> > NOT have the right to libel people at will. Free speech doesn't mean I
> > can say you have seven decapitated heads in your fridge, that would be
> > libel. It's a false accusation, as I've never seen the inside of your
> > fridge, nor do I know if you even possess such an appliance. Same with
> > your comments about my military service. You don't know anything about
> > it. I highly recommend that you cease making comments about me as if
> > they were fact, when they are merely products of your imagination. The
> > library staff are going to get pretty sick of my complaints. You segued
> > from accusations of drug abuse to accusations of treason. What's next?
> > Is there more you'd like to attack me on? Point by point, I will
> > complain every time you cross the line between truth and fantasy where
> > my reputation is concerned. At some point, you'll become such a source
> > of trouble to the library, I expect they'll have to yank your computer
> > privileges. What then? Will you be reduced to soliciting spare change on
> > street corners so you can afford to abuse the services of a cyber-cafe?
>
> As you so well pointed out: Psycho-Barb does not have a
> Constitutionally recognized right to call you a traitor, nor call you
> addicted to a proscribed (illegal) drug. Ordering Psycho-Barb to cease
> this civil abuse does not constitute "denial of free speach."
> Complaining to the Library is not an attack against Psycho-Barb's
> right to express her opinion.
>
> > --
> > barb
> > Chaplain, ARS
>
> ---
> Representative government in the USA represents money, not people, and
> therefore has forfeited our allegiance and moral support.

It is unbelievable how little Barb Graham and Dave Shy know about the laws, and how deep they will end up in legal problems denying my constitutional rights, and running a hate campaign against me. I indeed can prove that Barb Graham and Dave Shy started to attack me without any reason and run a criminal campaign against me, trying to descredit me, trying to steal constitutional right to speak. I also can prove how they twist the truth, claim things I never said and how they threatened me.

What they don't know is that other people are not so studid as they are, and they will not participate. But if they continue to harass the librarians here with calls and "complaints" about me, to force the library to participate in unconstitutional and criminal activities to deny acccess to me to the library, because of my views and opinions, they might have not only count with a law suit by me, but also by the library.

Barb Graham, if I have the time in future, I will surely pull the former translations that you made during the Vietnam War for the Army. I think the CofS should have done that long ago, and should have given them to another translator who speaks English and VN, just to see what kind of work you did for the USA. You said those are classified. I doubt it, and if they were, they probably are no longer, because the VN war is almost ancient history. Probably a brief request to declassify will do the trick.

Barbara Schwarz

<p><hr><p> From: BarbaraSchwarz2222@hotmail.com (BarbaraSchwarz)
Subject: Re: Scientology is a 'functional paranoid schizophrena' simulator
Date: 28 Apr 2003 09:42:13 -0700
Message-ID: <a6bc00a0.0304280842.38b25fe1@posting.google.com>

barb <bwarr1@cox.net> wrote in message news:<3EAAC16A.6070606@cox.net>... > Lawrence wrote:
> > "barb" <bwarr1@cox.net> wrote in message news:3EAA8A89.4070803@cox.net...
> > Lawrence wrote:
> > +++++++++++++++++++++
> > <Snip>
> >
> > Tch, Lawrence. You got so many MUs going, you should become a cattle
> > rancher!
> >
> > <Snip>
> >
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >
> > Dear Barb:
> >
> > Now that is a surprising statement from you Barb. The Lady who told me way
> > back in the newsgroup when I was truly naiive and new here, that I was a
> > "Scientologist" and covering the fact up because I used the word "data" in a
> > newsgroup message.
> >
> > Search for that posting of yours and you will find it.
> >
> > Here you are using the word "MU" which hardly anybody knows is a Scientology
> > word except Scientologists.
>
> Except Scientologists and critics who have studied the cult. Barbara
> Schwarz's accusations notwithstanding, I have a talent for languages,
> and how better to get a point across to a Scientologist (or ex) than
> speaking Hubbonics to them, eh?
>
> >
> > I remember everything, better than some people who claim to be real OT's.
> >
> > I was still favorably impressed by you then, and I still am now, so by all
> > means.....................feel free.
> >
> > Lawrence
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --

You surely come across to Scientologists, Barb Graham, and I tell you also as what: As a completely uneducated, cheap, intolerant, stupid, backwards, lying, slandering person, who has no respect of the law, and who degrades the position of a "chaplain" anywhere.

To tell you the truth: I met some infiltrators in the orgs, that were as you are, cheap and dirty, but real Scientologists have a lot, a lot more class, than you have, Barb Graham, and you would be the last person, they ever would turn to, ever!

You also don't know much about Scientology. I posted yourself that you don't have the brains to understand the Dianetics book.

You don't help people. You just tell them your misunderstandings and lies about Scientology. You try to infect them with your intolerant hatred against L. Ron Hubbard and Scientology. All what people get from you, while visiting you, is probably lung cancer, inhaling the smoke in your home or office. You are just no example for anybody. The only people that I imagine would come to you were the infiltrators. They just come to you for alibi reasons, they were never Scientologists, they were sent in to destroy, and now they need a sort of exit alibi, saying that you convinced them that Scientology was wrong, or whatever. It's all a big spectacle and the dummies fall for it.

You are nothing worth at all, Barb Graham, nothing at all. You are so fanatical and cheap, that you harm ARS more than you are helping them. Having you as "ARSCC Chaplain" is the motivator, the product of the lies and defamation, the harassment of that ARSCC hate gang.

Barbara Schwarz

Go Back