On BarbaraSchwarz...

On BarbaraSchwarz... http://www.scientology-kills.org

From the Book, "American Extremists" (p. 421)

"Principle Characteristics of the Extremes and the Mainstream in America: A Handy Guide for Extremist Watchers:

(Remember: Extremism is more a matter of style and tactics than of goals.)

1) EXHIBIT ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY THEY HAVE THE TRUTH. Which among other items, is that 2) AMERICA IS CONTROLLED TO A GREAT EXTENT BY A CONSPIRATORIAL GROUP. They believe this evil group to be very powerful and in control of most nations. This, it is not surprising that, due mainly to fear and frustration, extremists exhibit 3) HATRED OF OPPONENTS. Because these opponents (actually "enemies" in the extremists' eyes) are seen as part of or sympathizers with "The Conspiracy," they deserve hatred and contempt. Due to these factors it is not surprising that extremists have 4) LOW REGARD FOR OPEN SOCIETIES & THEREFORE LITTLE CONFIDENCE IN DEMOCRATIC PROCESSES. Since they believe "The Conspiracy" has control of the world's major nations, extremists spurn compromise and show a 5) WILLINGNESS TO DENY BASIC CIVIL LIBERTIES TO CERTAIN FELLOW CITIZENS, because enemies deserve no liberties. Therefore, extremists have no qualms about resorting to 6) CONSISTENT INDULGENCE IN IRRESPONSIBLE ACCUSATIONS AND CHARACTER ASSASSINATION, such as calling fellow citizens Communists, Insiders, Amoral Secular Humanists, Fascists, NAZIS [Emphasis Added by PSn], Racists, etc., & constantly imputing wicked motives to those who oppose them."

I stand to show the BarbaraSchwarz is an extremist by this very detailed definition, as if you weren't aware that she is one. I'll use the list, number by number.

1) She is consistent in ignoring any reasons as to why she is wrong. When she claims something, such as Nazi infiltration, she cites her own works as evidence, proving a self-delusional belief that she is somehow credible by default. Any and all evidence to the contrary of her theories and ideas and all attempts to reason with her fail, as she is so sure of her "truth" that anything other than what she says must be wrong.

2) She believes the US, Germany, and most countries in the world are controlled or in the process of being controlled by the Nazis. Somehow they've gained power after losing a war and being cut in half by the Soviet Union and the Allied powers.

3) Say anything contrary to her and you are automatically a Nazi sympathizer. Simple as that.

4) She seems to think that everyone has ear implants or something unusual of that sort, and that Nazis control everyone, so by inference, she can't have a high belief in Democracy. Especially the kind in Germany, France, and the USA.

5) She has several times said that she wanted numbers of people dead, imprisoned or otherwise stripped of rights for the simple idea that they don't agree to her alternate reality. She believes that critical Free Speech is a criminal act.

6) She launches assaults with ad hominem attacks on people, calling the Nazis, Gestapo, Spies, Traitors and other things.

She fits all six characteristics of an extremist. I submit the rest to discussion.

<hr> From: BarbaraSchwarz2222@hotmail.com (BarbaraSchwarz)
Subject: Re: Attentions, all Germans, which are no Nazis.... This is a warning!
Date: 29 Apr 2003 09:08:57 -0700
Message-ID: <a6bc00a0.0304290808.258b6066@posting.google.com>

Patrick J. Volk <pvolk6@attbi.com> wrote in message news:<tdgrav01eugeuuiuhffvpf3ucjdf2esss5@4ax.com>... > On 26 Apr 2003 09:51:40 -0700, BarbaraSchwarz2222@hotmail.com
> (BarbaraSchwarz) wrote:
>
> >I want to warn the Germans which live in Germany, (those which are no
> >Nazis, because I don't care much for the rest, which are still Nazis
> >at heart and in their minds) that they have to watch out to not become
> >victims of terror attacks by the still existing German Nazi secret
> >service, because in order to stay undetected, they would esp. attack
> >their own folk and blame the attacks on another source, that they
> >hired to commit the atrocities.
> >
> >My intuition really works. One year before Bin Laden organized the
> >September 11 terror attacks against the USA, I felt that too. I tried
> >to get the attention of the USA, many governmental agencies, on Bin
> >Laden, but as they are secretly German Nazi infiltrated, they did not
> >pull his files and did not step up the intelligence around that man
> >nor stepped up the security for the USA.
> >
> >I have the same strange feeling for Germany. I think in order to come
> >away they would play "victim" and target Germans, to create the
> >impression it is not them which organize the terror acts and the
> >atrocities all over the world.
> >
> >What you have to do is to bring that German still existing Nazi secret
> >service to it's knees, you have to convict them, before they can go
> >through with attacking you, the German citizens. Don't leave that up
> >to only your government. You have a still existing Nazi government. It
> >will not protect your rights either. They will let you die, just as
> >German soldiers died in Stalingrad for nothing after the war was
> >already lost and nobody called them back.
> >
> >Barbara Schwarz,
> >April 25, 2003
>
> I thought things were on the better side once Germany unified and got
> rid of Hoennecker. The Stazi who used to keep chamois cloths trying to
> get scents of people on file...
>
> Stalingrad is a prime example of what happens to citizens who do not
> oppose an oppressive regime. One of the often-forgotten aspects of
> being a citizen is you have the right, 'privelege', or responsibility
> to be killed for your country as either a soldier or a criminal.
> Doesn't matter whether it's Stalingrad, or Hamburg.
>
> On the one hand, the people who remember the Nazis in their heydey
> are dying off. They also happen to be the people who remember vividly
> the horrors of war.
> On the other hand, you have a generation who did not experience
> that. The benefit, and curse, of growing up in a world remade after
> the horrors of WWII. They may regail the glory, but not the horror.
> Same deal with the Aryan idiots in the US (many of whom probably don't
> realize the hypocrasy that the very institution they love probably
> would've strung them up their fathers as immigrants one or two
> generations ago).

I had to live in Germany for a long time, Patrick. I came to the conclusion that the still existing Nazi secret service just build the wall to let the world believe that they don't secretly run all of Germany and also infiltrated other governments. They could have pulled down the wall right away, at any given moment, or could have organized that nobody ever build it. They made themselves smaller, because they offended the world, even their agents in other countries, with gassing Millions of people.

Hoennecker was one of their own agents. They run this guy, as they run STASI even the KGB. I agree with you on the aryan idiots in the USA and other countries, but those are people that are set up by the still existing Nazi secret service to not let the idea of the Nazi supremacy die up. They hope they come back, take over the world and claim that Hitler was so right.

However, that posting above was made by me for those Germans that are no Nazis, even despite I did not meet many, while I was in Germany. The Germans are in danger of being attacked by their own secret service, because they want to make a point that it is not them which organize terror, but it is them. They hire other nationals to do the dirt for them. Just as they hired Hitler, who was no German but Austrian. They thought they could blame the Austrians at the end, but it did not work out that way. That is why they pick now people from countries further away from Germany, as the orientals, and they also set up the headquarters of those mainly not more in Germany but elsewhere, to stay undiscovered.

I think that the German people should to watch their backs and should demand their still existing Nazi secret service completely and entirely dismantled. The German secret service attack their own agents, they don't like anybody. They don't like even themselves, otherwise they would not commit those crimes and burden their conscience. They don't have much, because they don't think much, but nevertheless.

Barbara Schwarz

<hr> From: BarbaraSchwarz2222@hotmail.com (BarbaraSchwarz)
Subject: Re: On BarbaraSchwarz...
Date: 29 Apr 2003 11:29:08 -0700
Message-ID: <a6bc00a0.0304291029.77b0c98f@posting.google.com>

"Dianna Wagner" <wagnerdianna@NOSPAMprodigy.net> wrote in message news:<QOkra.67$dt2.41@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com>... > "PSn" <benalishsiward.nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:sc2dneVvVPJLNTCjXTWcqA@comcast.com...
> > Because when you simply dismiss someone without explanation other than
> "that
> > sounds nuts," you place yourself in the same category as the Spanish
> > Inquisitors and others who dismissed many of the things we know today to
> be
> > true.
> >
> > Only by PROVING that her beliefs are rooted in paranoid extremist
> delusions
> > can you dismiss her as a nut without being a hypocrite.
> >
> > PSn
>
> Dude...she says we're all controlled by the Nazis through ear implants..that
> ain't proof enough for ya?

You just don't get it, that the still existing Nazis run you through your ear implants, Dianna Wagner. You think it is the guy that recruited you as kid and helped you to cheat through school. If you would analyze how anti-semitic and anti-american those orders are that you receive through your earimplant, you would become a lot smarter and would not try to discredit me, who discovered what is going on in the world.

Thinking that the Germans would not try to run the world population through ear implants to control them, means that you slept through history classes speaking about the Germans. Your postings just say, you are not very smart, Dianne. I hope nobody ever hires you for any counterintelligence job. We would be so lost!

Barbara Schwarz

<hr> Message-ID: <3EAFDB9A.1010003@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 07:20:10 -0700
From: barb <bwarr1@cox.net>
Subject: Re: BarbaraSchwarz impervious to logic!

Zinj wrote: > In article <3EAF2B86.6040800@cox.net>, bwarr1@cox.net says...
>
> <snip>
>
>>How many newspapers do you have to use to keep warm? Are there steam
>>grates in Salt Lake City?
>
>
> Having been 'homeless' in my life, I'm less than impressed with you
> denigrating Barbara this way.
>
> From what she's said, she *has* a room, even if it doesn't have a phone
> line.
>
> If she doesn't... well God help her. I suspect she has found a way to
> live that supports her dramatic worldview.
>
> It's mean spirited to toss sand in that mechanism. Please stop.
>
> Zinj

Just giving her a taste of her own medicine, Zinj. Just because someone's insane is no reason to excuse their vicious attacks. Surely you didn't miss her numerous posts dedicated to denigrating moi?

I think the poor thing is trying to hurt my feelings! Having gone a few rounds with PTSC, I must say she's sadly unqualified to actually affect me by anything she posts, but I'm not too inclined just to ignore it.

Yes, her attacks are sub-par, and of the usual Scientology low standard we've come to expect from such stellar spokes-thetans such as Nelson and Clambob Fudgepants, and yes, it's mean to pick on the mentally ill. Having said that, it's a rough world out here in the wilds of the Net, where the Marquis of Queenbury rules don't apply.

You're always welcome to skip any correspondance between Barbara Schwarz and myself. You're also welcome to try to curb my behavior. After that, you can go sweep the tide away from the beach. I imagine you'd have about the same success rate.

-- -- barb Chaplain, ARS

"After over 50 years, what has Scientology given the world? Misery, hopelessness, broken families, desolation, death." -Shydavid

<hr> From: BarbaraSchwarz2222@hotmail.com (BarbaraSchwarz)
Subject: Re: What is San Luis Obispo Sheriff Patrick Hedges hiding?
Date: 30 Apr 2003 12:31:10 -0700
Message-ID: <a6bc00a0.0304301131.10327ccf@posting.google.com>

ShyDavid wrote in message news:<3ead7f90@news2.lightlink.com>... > On 28 Apr 2003 08:55:19 -0700, BarbaraSchwarz2222@hotmail.com
> (BarbaraSchwarz) wrote:
>
> > On March 6, 2003, I e-mailed a request for records under the federal
> > FOIA and the California state records laws for the records on L. Ron
> > Hubbard and cornoner file 8936
>
> Didn't a judge rule that you are no longer allowed to harass people
> via the FOIA, and that you appear to be a psycho kook who is demanding
> documents that do not exist?
>
> ---
> Let every man make known what kind of government would command his respect,
> and that will be one step toward obtaining it.

You never got your homework right, Dave, that is also why you have no clue about me, my actions and my litigation. Do you want to cover up the murder of L. Ron Hubbard? What has my federal FOIA/PA requests or litigation to do with California state records? Nothing! Except, that I evidently did not get all the records in the file on the alleged death of L. Ron Hubbard; that those records are deliberately and illegally concealed before me, to prevent that I come behind was happened to L. Ron Hubbard in 1984 and to the imposter in 1986.

Tell me, you "Einstein", what happened to the bladder of the imposter? Who took that thing out? Why was the bladder gone before the coroner could look at it?

Why would the Sheriff's Office and the FBI discuss the fingerprints at the phone and not in writing?

What is the matter with the constantly changing wills, even a day before the imposter was murdered? That is all normal in your book, and I am just a kook, because I happened to notice the outpoints?

You are such a weirdo, Dave Shy, a real corrupt country boy.

Barbara Schwarz

<hr> From: BarbaraSchwarz2222@hotmail.com (BarbaraSchwarz)
Subject: Re: What is San Luis Obispo Sheriff Patrick Hedges hiding?
Date: 1 May 2003 09:02:47 -0700
Message-ID: <a6bc00a0.0305010802.4129764f@posting.google.com>

Patrick J. Volk <pvolk6@attbi.com> wrote in message news:<a4n0bvk453ibkthngqipp29aq292utm2o6@4ax.com>... > On 28 Apr 2003 08:55:19 -0700, BarbaraSchwarz2222@hotmail.com
> (BarbaraSchwarz) wrote:
>
> >On March 6, 2003, I e-mailed a request for records under the federal
> >FOIA and the California state records laws for the records on L. Ron
> >Hubbard and cornoner file 8936, to jgolls@co.slo.ca.us,
> >webmaster@co.slo.ca.us, slocooesa@fix.net, help_desk@co.slo.ca.us,
> >webmaster@co.slo.ca.us and rdonalies@co.slo.ca.us. (Rdonalies replied
> >not more working for the Sheriff's Office, so I took that address of
> >my list.)
> >
> >Everybody on this list illegally ignored my request, that was
> >addressed to Sheriff Patrick Hedges, personal. On March 15, 2003, I
> >re-mailed the request to all above and asked the Sheriff Office to
> >finally acknowledge the receipt of this request. With date stamp March
> >21, 2003, I received an envelope from the Office of Sheriff/Coroner of
> >San Luis Obispo, no cover letter added, only seven pages inside on
> >file 8936.
> >
> >I studied the papers and on March 27, 2003, I mailed an objection to
> >above mentioned e-mail addresses, for Sheriff Hedges, with following
> >arguments:
> >
> >That they must have more records in this file than just seven pages,
> >that I received only the cornoner information sheet, the investigation
> >report, the report on post mortem examination and the toxicology
> >report, that following records were missing: The certificate of
> >religious belief; the 13 photos of the dead body; the fingerprints
> >that Dr. Kirschner took, but also those that attorney Peterson
> >brought, and any other fingerprints; L. Ron Hubbard's last wills and
> >the testament of 1982, 1983 and 1986; the 1983 Codicil; the news
> >releases that are mentioned in the investigation; the U.S. Navy
> >Certificate of Satisfactory Service Card; the Special Officer
> >Identification Card; copy of the passport; and any other documents
> >pertaining to L. Ron Hubbard.
>
> - What would a coroner be doing with a statement of religious belief?
> - Dead body photos may be witheld because they're dead body photos
> (c.f. Dale Earnhardt)
> - Can wills be private?
> - The documents of his Navy career would be with the DoD, not the
> Sheriff's office.
>
> (The FBI should also have fingerprint records of LRH, that's part of
> normal procedure for a security clearance).

Hold on a minute, Patrick! Those documents that I listed that were not sent to me are no invention by me. Those documents are listed in the few pages that the Sheriff's Office sent to me. The question should be not, what should the Sheriff do with that, the questions is, why were they not sent to me.

The "Statement of religious belief" must be in the coroner's office, because it says allegedly that Ron didn't want any autopsy. I just are convinced that he never signed that document, but that Jack, the imposter did sign it.

As far as the wills are concerned, I guess many are kept private, but I also know that Ron did not signs those wills, but that Jack, the imposter did. I read some of the wills on the net. I don't know if those are the SCN versions, but if so, I know that Ron never signed them. You see, I happened to remember that L. Ron Hubbard never married Mary Sue. I am certain, they never met. She made the marriage up and went to a sperm bank to be impregnated with stolen sperm. He never would have mentioned her in any will. He also did not knew anything of her criminal activities as Controller. The information that she claimed to be the controller was completely kept away from him by other Scientology intiltrators.

The only reason why the photos of the dead body were withheld is, because those which withhold them know, that the dead man of 1986 was not L. Ron Hubbard.

The Sheriff's Office or Coroner Office wrote themselves that they have those military documents on L. Ron Hubbard. They just did not mail it to me, because afraid I figure too much out, which should be concealed.

For what needed L. Ron Hubbard a security clearance by the FBI? I don't know any reason why the FBI should have his fingerprints. I don't believe they have them. I think they have those of Jack Marshall, the clone. And if they are the same as the SCN attorney provided, than you of course have a match, only, that both fingerprints don't belong to L. Ron Hubbard.

Fingerprints can be also forged. There is information on the web about that. The police in Salt Lake City explained it so detailed how it can be done, that everybody could do it.

> >I informed the Sheriff that I noticed that the Coroner could not
> >examine the bladder of the deceased person, because the bladder was
> >removed by somebody. I asked who removed it and why.
> >
> >I also wrote to the Sheriff, that I noticed that Det. Feierabend's
> >phonecall to the FBI to determine that the fingerprints match was not
> >appropriate. I also pointed out that fingerprints can be forged.
> >
> >I requested any other records on L. Ron Hubbard that they sofar have
> >not mailed to me, and asked them also if they have any records on me,
> >Barbara Schwarz.
> >
> >I furthermore informed Sheriff Hedges, that I am certain that the dead
> >body of January 1986 was not L. Ron Hubbard, but an impostor.
> >
> >I received no response by anybody of the Sheriff's Office. On April
> >22, 2003, I wrote a nudge to the Sheriff and those e-mail addresses as
> >listed above.
> >
> >On April 22, 2003, Sheriff Patrick Hedges slosheriff@fix.net, wrote an
> >e-mail to all mentioned above, but not to me. He did not think that I
> >would get a copy of his e-mail.
> >
> >In this April 22, 2003, Hedges, twisted the law, by telling those
> >others more or less that FOIA/PA or California records laws don't need
> >to be upheld, and that I would be no person who has any rights to
> >those laws, by trying to discredit me. He wrote that he would
> >"apologize" to the others, being "bothered continually" by me, and
> >that "probably most have already decided, that it would be not
> >necessary to take any actions on my request". He attached as
> >information for the other something he found on me on the web, which
> >is the unresearched article of a private citizen, Steven Aftergood, a
> >conspiracy theorist, that can't make his homework and wrote a
> >blistering hate article about my legal cases (to which he has no clue)
> >in his SECRECY NEWS. Steven Aftergood is so biased and one-sided that
> >he did not even think it was necessary to contact me for imput to his
> >article.
> >
> >This Sheriff is completely out of line. He has to obay to federal and
> >state laws, he should know better than referring to a private
> >citizen's hate campaign against me. It doesn't matter how much others
> >hate your guts, people, a governmental office is not allowed to
> >participate. They have to grant your request for records and have to
> >stick to the law.
> >
> >Here is my conclusion: Sheriff Hedges knew that the man who died in
> >1986 was not L. Ron Hubbard, it was Jack Marshall, the imposter. Ron
> >was murdered secretly already in May 1984. Sheriff Hedges appears to
> >know that, this is why he doesn't want me to get more documents, he is
> >afraid, I puzzle everything together and prove it.
> >
> >Fingerprints can be forged. But it could be even possible that the
> >fingerprints indeed matched, but they were always only Jack's and not
> >Ron's. In other words, those prints that the FBI had, were already
> >those of Jack and not Ron's. The FBI had never any fingerprints from
> >Ron. Why should they? Many FBI offices wrote to me they did not even
> >consider him ever a target for electronical surveillance. Also, what
> >strange procedure is that to check up that fingerprints fit over the
> >phone?
>
> Hubbard as commander of a ship would have required Secret clearance
> to receive orders (battle plans are normally TS).
>
> It isn't strange that they can do a fingerprint check over the phone.
> There's a couple of ways. Fax, notation, or sending a photo over the
> telephone.
>
> How can fingerprints be forged?
>

They make a print from somebody, then doctor around. They can even plant fingerprints, by pressing such a forged print on clay and then go to a crime scene and plant it there. Some call fingerprints a "junk science".

>
>
> >
> >Did it work like this?
> >"Hey, Buddy, from the FBI, I have some lines in those prints, you
> >too?"
> >"Yes, Sheriff-Dude, I saw some too, so it must be L. Ron Hubbard."
> >
> >And what is with the bladder of the imposter? Who cut this thing out?
> >Bladders don't just take a hike on their own. Did Dr. Denk do it, or
> >the Broekers? Who else? How can you get a dead body without a bladder
> >in it and not be surprised?
>
> Why would they remove the bladder? As an organ goes, it doesn't really
> hold any forensic treasures (urine can be gotten in the ureters or the
> kidneys, but you have blood to do toxicology on also, or even fluids).
>
> Coroners aren't always the first one to do an autopsy. Sometimes the
> initial one can be done at the hospital.

But there is no mention in the coroner report about that Jack Marshall, the imposter, was in a hospital to get the bladder removed. It just says that the bladder was missing, as it would be a bag that people lose just like that, and this is very strange.

I don't agree that a coroner could not find important clues in a bladder. My guess is that there was stuff in that bladder, that would have made everybody say, that this dead man was not L. Ron Hubbard.

I am not making that up with the missing bladder, just read the coroner documents yourself. It's in there.

Ron did not assign the lead of Scientology to David Miscavige. That "affidavit" was not signed by Ron, but once more, by Jack, the imposter. Of course he doesn't scream foul, because D. Miscavige is part of the disgusting plot.

>
> >
> >There is so much criminal activity in that case. If the Church of
> >Scientology would be not so terrible infiltrated by
> >non-Scientologists, they would have screamed "foul" right from the
> >start.
>
> Scientology is in anarchy. The succession power struggle was already
> in full tilt when he died. The winners (Miscavige) certainly wouldn't
> be screaming foul (considering how well he made out).
>
> >
> >And I don't even want to mention the odd thing with the wills and the
> >change of the will, the day, before the imposter died. I also don't
> >think he just died. I think he was murdered too. People should think
> >it is L. Ron Hubbard, that is why he was killed the day the Space
> >Shuttle exploded, to keep the attention of the media on something
> >every else. Those that killed the real L. Ron Hubbard in 1984 and the
> >imposter in 1986 did not want anybody to nose around, the way I do it.
>
> You're going to have to do more than that to convince me. He was a
> drinker and a smoker, and was in the age range for a death due to
> those causes.

I am not trying to convince you or anybody. I just put posts out to make some people think, and if you are not one of them, alright. You are dead wrong with claiming that Ron drunk and smokes. He did not. He also was much younger than they say. I remember him being born in the mid 1920s.

As far as the ear implants are concerned. L. Ron Hubbard was like I am. We did not run to the drum of a mindcontroller/caseofficer. You know how they look like, Patrick. You have them yourself.

Barbara Schwarz

<hr> From: BarbaraSchwarz2222@hotmail.com (BarbaraSchwarz)
Subject: Re: Hubbard Advice: "Lie to People"
Date: 1 May 2003 09:35:25 -0700
Message-ID: <a6bc00a0.0305010835.59dd8e0f@posting.google.com>

rr@dds.nl.ReMoVeThIs (Rasta Robert) wrote in message news:<3eaef116.2343424@news.cistron.nl>... > On 29 Apr 2003 11:35:22 -0700, BarbaraSchwarz2222@hotmail.com (BarbaraSchwarz)
> wrote in alt.religion.scientology:
>
> >"Feisty" <sunny@skytoday.com> wrote in message news:<wcnra.899$mD5.392648@dca1-nnrp1.news.algx.net>...
> >> From a lecture of 25 June 1952 called "Overts, Motivators
> >> and Deds:"
> >>
> >> "The only way you can control people is to lie to them. You can
> >> write that down in your book in big letters. The only way you can
> >> control people is to lie to them.
> >
> >
> >L. Ron Hubbard never advocated lies. L. Ron Hubbard wrote that the
> >truth is absolutely important. He wrote that mindcontrollers lie to
> >people, that they hold people blind and stupid, to control them. Just
> >as you are being controlled by them, Anti-Feist.
> >
>
> Can anyone read what L Ron Hubbard really wrote, or are you
> the only one who has (had) access to that?
>
> Rasta Robert
> --//->

I posted before, Robert, that L. Ron Hubbard was under protective CIA surveillance since at least Dwight David Eisenhower became U.S. President.

Everything that L. Ron Hubbard wrote and said, is in CIA files. If the professional work of L. Ron Hubbard is made public by the CIA, everybody would know what man he was, not only I, or the people that really knew him, not the liars that said they knew him, by making that completely up.

Barbara Schwarz

<hr> From: BarbaraSchwarz2222@hotmail.com (BarbaraSchwarz)
Subject: Re: What is San Luis Obispo Sheriff Patrick Hedges hiding?
Date: 2 May 2003 10:27:55 -0700
Message-ID: <a6bc00a0.0305020927.224f2a8a@posting.google.com>

ShyDavid (ShyDavid) wrote in message news:<3eb1cd7c@news2.lightlink.com>... > On 1 May 2003 09:02:47 -0700, BarbaraSchwarz2222@hotmail.com
> (BarbaraSchwarz) wrote:
>
> > Patrick J. Volk <pvolk6@attbi.com> wrote in message
> > news:<a4n0bvk453ibkthngqipp29aq292utm2o6@4ax.com>...
>
> (Cut)
>
> >> (The FBI should also have fingerprint records of LRH, that's
> >> part of normal procedure for a security clearance).
>
> (Cut)
>
> > The "Statement of religious belief" must be in the coroner's
> > office, because it says allegedly that Ron didn't want any
> > autopsy. I just are convinced that he never signed that
> > document, but that Jack, the imposter did sign it.
>
> I agree with you: Hubbard was not likely to sign such a document. (He
> didn't have any religious beliefs.) More to the point, a few witnesses
> said he was UNABLE to sign any documents. The Last Will and Testament
> attributed to him was dated a day before his death (23 Jan 1986), at a
> time when Hubbard was doped up on anti-psychotic medication. It is
> possible that the Will was writtened and signed after Hubbard died.
>
> This does NOT mean that an international Nazi conspiracy was involved;
> instead of looking for Nazis, check for dwarfs.
>
> ---
> "You are such a weirdo, Dave Shy, a real corrupt country boy."
> --- Barbara Schwarz

You speak of the imposter, that the German still existing Nazi secret hired, to goof others to believe he is the real L. Ron Hubbard. You are a spin doctor, Dave Shy, you twist everything around, but it will not get you far.

L. Ron Hubbard was murdered around May 5, 1984.

Barbara Schwarz

<hr> From: BarbaraSchwarz2222@hotmail.com (BarbaraSchwarz)
Subject: Re: Attentions, all Germans, which are no Nazis.... This is a warning!
Date: 2 May 2003 10:37:12 -0700
Message-ID: <a6bc00a0.0305020937.5aeaafd5@posting.google.com>

ShyDavid wrote in message news:<3ead8741$1@news2.lightlink.com>... > On 28 Apr 2003 09:21:09 -0700, BarbaraSchwarz2222@hotmail.com
> (BarbaraSchwarz) wrote:
>
> > If you people would know how often I was correct with my predictions,
> > you would not post stupid heckler remarks, but rather get the message
> > out, to prevent worse from happening.
>
> So.... give us some examples of your "predictions" that were and are
> "correct." What are you waiting for? And why don't you warn the FBI?
>
> Utah Federal Bureau of Investigation
> 257 East 200 Street South, Suite 1200
> Salt Lake City, UT 84111-2048
> Telephone: (801) 579-1400
>
> > Barbara Schwarz
>
> ---
> Let every man make known what kind of government would command his respect,
> and that will be one step toward obtaining it.

Dave Shy, you uneducated dude, it's not the FBI's duty to protect the Germans. FBI should protect Americans first of all. The FBI does already so much for the Germans, e.g. covering up their illegal infiltration of the U.S. government.

I posted the start of this thread also in the German Anti-Scientology newsgroup. Those Germans should hand the thread to their government, investigators and media. It's Germany's duty to protect the Germans.

As for my predictions, unfortunately, they have a tendency to become true. I posted those already before, I don't have the time to repeat everything for you, Dave, you are anyhow so spiritually malnurished, that you don't even feel spirituality inside yourself. What is the sense in trying to explain spiritual matters to a dried up guy like you?

Barbara Schwarz

<hr> From: BarbaraSchwarz2222@hotmail.com (BarbaraSchwarz)
Subject: Lynn Farney is a Scientology infiltrator and no Scientologist!
Date: 5 May 2003 09:09:00 -0700
Message-ID: <a6bc00a0.0305050809.feac256@posting.google.com>

That's right, Lynn Farney is no Scientologist, but a criminal infiltrator. In my legal case, that I filed 1992/1993 against the criminal infiltrators of Scientology International, Lynn Farney filed a corrupt and unspecific affidavit that was used by the court to keep Mark Rathbun (de Rothschild) and I apart.

Farney and others within OSA wasted Scientology reserves to hire an expensive Salt Lake Law firm, Snow, Christensen and Martineau, to prevent that I will obtain any information as to where innocent Marty is being incarcerated. Farney and those within OSA INT, which supported his actions did not want me to find Marty, to testify for him as his proper relief witness, and to get him exonerated, which is so despicable and suppressive!

I did never sue any Scientology org for any damages or money. All I wanted to know is where Marty is, and what happened to him. It is disgusting that this kind of information was not volunteered by the infiltrated orgs, and that Farney and the other infiltrators hired attorneys to make sure that I will not obtain this information and that I can't help Marty out of his wrongful incarceration.

Before I filed that 1992/93 lawsuit, I wrote letters to several Scientology International executives, asked them to inform me about the whereabouts of Marty, and if he was one of the 71 Scientologists, which were arrested on November 21, 1988 in Madrid, Spain, but nobody replied, which is also very very strange. - One of my letters to President of Scientology Int., Heber Jentzsch came back to me with note that he would be "unknown". (Still doubts that the orgs are infiltrated by criminal non-Scio's, that don't even want to know their President?)

As I was kicked out of the orgs several times, I saw no way of success going to L.A., trying to talk to true Scientologists, because the SCN infiltrators would have ganged up already on me at the receptions and kicked me out once more.

I would have immediately withdrawn the case against the SCN INT, if anybody of the orgs would have written to me, or would have come by apartment to provide me with the information, but that never happened. The orgs hired instead the expensive and corrupt law firm, as mentioned above, and wasted money that should be used for religious purposes, and not for a case that they could have gotten rid off within a few minutes and without paying a cent to anybody.

I decided that I just have only one choice to being heard, and that was to sue, to get the information about Marty's whereabouts. I did it with much regret. I never will forgive the infiltrators for having me forced to sue Scientology. I asked the judge Bruce Jenkins, of the USDC Utah, to subpoena Heber Jentzsch as witness, because I knew that Heber would not lie, but would tell the truth. Judge Jenkins apparently knew that too, that is why he did not want Heber to be called as witness. The judge was completely biased, he told me outrageous lie, that the U.S. Constitution, or the Utah Constitutions would not protect marriages. He said, that he would not know any part of the Constitution that would protect a marriage, and this judge was the Chief judge of the court at that time! He told me more or less to get over Marty and get another man. The judge probably was also in a hurry to watch TV, because the day of my hearing, the Davidian compound in Waco burned down.

It is so unbelievable and outrageous that the criminal infiltrators of SCN waste non-profit SCN money to keep two Scientologists apart. One purpose of the IAS is to unite (!) Scientology, not seperate them with help of sleezy attorneys, corrupt judges and governmental officials.

Another part of this case was against the Utah Department of Corrections, that covered up the wrongful incarceration of Marty. I got enough suspicious mail from the Utah Dept. of Corrections, to be sure, that I was right assuming that they held him as inmate, but did all they could to prevent my testimony for him, so that he can't be aqcuitted by my testimony. One inmate even had written to me that he saw him in the prison yard, but as I already mentioned, judge Jenkins was biased, and did not want me to find him or to testify for him.

If Marty would be free and well and on his own in the orgs, it would be such an easy thing to get rid of me. All he has to do is to tell me face to face, that I shall get out of his life and should move on. And I would be out of his life. It would cost the orgs no cent, but infiltrators as Farney and others, apparently know that Marty doesn't want me out of his life, that's why they waste SCN money in completely unreligious "defense actions", to keep Marty and I apart. It is so disgusting, and so non-scientologicial.

Virginia McClaughry posted, that she would not join the orgs again. I would, but would kick the criminal infiltrator behinds, and that for good. I would make sure that SCN returns to it's true religious roots and would get Ron back, because if anybody recognizes him in his new body, it's me.

If Virginia McClaughry would have been ever a real Scientologist and not just another infiltrator, she would have never made such a remark, because she would have Scientology and true Scientologist at heart as I do, and not just her unimportant, ridiculous movement, that doesn't keep original Scientology alive and working either.

She posted, that I am a non-existing person, but an OSA operation, a caricature of her, created to make others believe she would be me. She thinks she is so important, that OSA sues itself (my case against the SCN INT)and sues all of the also infiltrated U.S. government (my numerous cases against all of the U.S. government). And that all to make some impression on the world through the "very important" Virginia.

I believe around year 2000, Virginia published on the web, that German Nazis are behind psychs, and she warned against electronical devices implanted in the human bodies to control them. I claimed that (only more specific) already since the mid 1980s, which means that Virginia rather tries to copy me, so many years later.

Barbara Schwarz

<hr> From: BarbaraSchwarz2222@hotmail.com (BarbaraSchwarz)
Subject: Re: Lynn Farney is a Scientology infiltrator and no Scientologist!
Date: 6 May 2003 10:59:34 -0700
Message-ID: <a6bc00a0.0305060959.2bc37740@posting.google.com>

pekteno@yahoo.com (Harold Pekteno) wrote in message news:<eb6dea9b.0305051938.6702fcc9@posting.google.com>... > BarbaraSchwarz2222@hotmail.com (BarbaraSchwarz) wrote in message news:<a6bc00a0.0305050809.feac256@posting.google.com>...
>
> > That's right, Lynn Farney is no Scientologist, but a criminal
> > infiltrator. In my legal case, that I filed 1992/1993 against the
> > criminal infiltrators of Scientology International, Lynn Farney filed
> > a corrupt and unspecific affidavit that was used by the court to keep
> > Mark Rathbun (de Rothschild) and I apart.
>
> Or maybe Mark doesn't share your hallucination that you and he are
> married, and wisely wanted nothing to do with you.

How dare you to speak for Marty.

Even if his feelings for me would have changed (which I don't believe at all), he would not rather wasted thousands of Dollars of religious non-profit money to pay attorneys to fight me. He rather would have told me to see him, where he would have told me in polite manner, that it would be better if we would move in two seperate ways. End of the case. I would have withdrawn the case, no thousands of Dollars attorneys fees would have been ever incurred for SCN. I would have wished Marty all the best for his future, end of story.

The reason why Marty is so quiet, is because he is wrongfully locked up and can't act as he would like to. My intuition tells me that Marty is same passionately in love with me as I am with him. It's just a matter of time if we are back together.

Barbara Schwarz

<hr> From: Patrick J. Volk <pvolk6@attbi.com>
Subject: Re: Lynn Farney is a Scientology infiltrator and no Scientologist!
Message-ID: <hpmjbvg8c5fdj689vju3f76dth2mjfi9u4@4ax.com>
Organization: AT&T Broadband
Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 04:22:30 GMT

On 6 May 2003 10:59:34 -0700, BarbaraSchwarz2222@hotmail.com (BarbaraSchwarz) wrote:

>pekteno@yahoo.com (Harold Pekteno) wrote in message news:<eb6dea9b.0305051938.6702fcc9@posting.google.com>...
>> BarbaraSchwarz2222@hotmail.com (BarbaraSchwarz) wrote in message news:<a6bc00a0.0305050809.feac256@posting.google.com>...
>>
>> > That's right, Lynn Farney is no Scientologist, but a criminal
>> > infiltrator. In my legal case, that I filed 1992/1993 against the
>> > criminal infiltrators of Scientology International, Lynn Farney filed
>> > a corrupt and unspecific affidavit that was used by the court to keep
>> > Mark Rathbun (de Rothschild) and I apart.
>>
>> Or maybe Mark doesn't share your hallucination that you and he are
>> married, and wisely wanted nothing to do with you.
>
>
>How dare you to speak for Marty.
>
>Even if his feelings for me would have changed (which I don't believe
>at all), he would not rather wasted thousands of Dollars of religious
>non-profit money to pay attorneys to fight me. He rather would have
>told me to see him, where he would have told me in polite manner, that
>it would be better if we would move in two seperate ways. End of the
>case. I would have withdrawn the case, no thousands of Dollars
>attorneys fees would have been ever incurred for SCN. I would have
>wished Marty all the best for his future, end of story.
>
>The reason why Marty is so quiet, is because he is wrongfully locked
>up and can't act as he would like to. My intuition tells me that Marty
>is same passionately in love with me as I am with him. It's just a
>matter of time if we are back together.

Those last few lines are really creepy. As in stalker-creepy. Really the whole thing is. Perhaps he already tried saying he wasn't interested. Lawsuits are funny for burning bridges like that, you know?

>
>Barbara Schwarz

<hr> From: BarbaraSchwarz2222@hotmail.com (BarbaraSchwarz)
Subject: Re: Lynn Farney is a Scientology infiltrator and no Scientologist!
Date: 8 May 2003 08:52:54 -0700
Message-ID: <a6bc00a0.0305080752.25d6b399@posting.google.com>

Patrick J. Volk <pvolk6@attbi.com> wrote in message news:<hpmjbvg8c5fdj689vju3f76dth2mjfi9u4@4ax.com>... > On 6 May 2003 10:59:34 -0700, BarbaraSchwarz2222@hotmail.com
> (BarbaraSchwarz) wrote:
>
> >pekteno@yahoo.com (Harold Pekteno) wrote in message news:<eb6dea9b.0305051938.6702fcc9@posting.google.com>...
> >> BarbaraSchwarz2222@hotmail.com (BarbaraSchwarz) wrote in message news:<a6bc00a0.0305050809.feac256@posting.google.com>...
> >>
> >> > That's right, Lynn Farney is no Scientologist, but a criminal
> >> > infiltrator. In my legal case, that I filed 1992/1993 against the
> >> > criminal infiltrators of Scientology International, Lynn Farney filed
> >> > a corrupt and unspecific affidavit that was used by the court to keep
> >> > Mark Rathbun (de Rothschild) and I apart.
> >>
> >> Or maybe Mark doesn't share your hallucination that you and he are
> >> married, and wisely wanted nothing to do with you.
> >
> >
> >How dare you to speak for Marty.
> >
> >Even if his feelings for me would have changed (which I don't believe
> >at all), he would not rather wasted thousands of Dollars of religious
> >non-profit money to pay attorneys to fight me. He rather would have
> >told me to see him, where he would have told me in polite manner, that
> >it would be better if we would move in two seperate ways. End of the
> >case. I would have withdrawn the case, no thousands of Dollars
> >attorneys fees would have been ever incurred for SCN. I would have
> >wished Marty all the best for his future, end of story.
> >
> >The reason why Marty is so quiet, is because he is wrongfully locked
> >up and can't act as he would like to. My intuition tells me that Marty
> >is same passionately in love with me as I am with him. It's just a
> >matter of time if we are back together.
>
> Those last few lines are really creepy. As in stalker-creepy. Really
> the whole thing is. Perhaps he already tried saying he wasn't
> interested. Lawsuits are funny for burning bridges like that, you
> know?

Pardon my French, Patrick Volk, but you are really a corrupt idiot. What do you mean "perhaps he tried saying he wasn't interested"? If you don't know it for sure, why don't you shut up and try not to talk on Marty's behalf? And what do you mean anyway with that?

Marty is a religious man. He would not waste SCN money to get rid of me. He would see me and tell me. He knows me well enough that I never would stalk him if he would be not more interested, and I posted this already above.

I also did not sue Marty. Can't you read? I did not sue the religion Scientology, nor any good and true Scientology. I don't care 'burning bridges' with criminal SCN infiltrators as Lynn Farney. By the way, you don't like SCN, why do you suddenly speak on their behalf? You are only speaking on their behalf, if you see a chance to mislead, right? My law suit just proves that the orgs are infiltrated by non-Scientologists.

You are a just a jealous bastard, Patrick Volk, with lots of evil intentions.

Barbara Schwarz

<hr> From: BarbaraSchwarz2222@hotmail.com (BarbaraSchwarz)
Subject: Re: Simple Question for Barbara Schwarz
Date: 14 May 2003 08:20:49 -0700
Message-ID: <a6bc00a0.0305140720.6f9d73b8@posting.google.com>

esperantujo@yahoo.com (Stefano MacGregor) wrote in message news:<6b9b63b5.0305132204.4108efe9@posting.google.com>... > Barbara:
>
> I've seen a few of your posts about the ear implants that the Nazis
> use to control people, and was wondering if you know why they use such
> outdated technology instead of the more modern mind-control devices,
> like lasers and such.
>
> Do they have trouble understanding the new technology, or are they
> afraid of it for some reason?

I don't spend so much time on Google and in the newsgroups. As rowdy Dave Shy uses my name in everything he posts as signature line, my name section of Google is very crowded. I often don't roll through all the Google postings, but just check my name, if I should reply to something. That should explain why I may overlook some questions or postings of others, who want me to respond.

You call the ear implants, the microchips in the middle ears, through which the agents receive orders outdated? Interesting. I am sure the German still existing Nazi secret service receives your comment and will think about that.

Alright, Stefano, explain me, how you would forward orders to you agents with lasers? Let say, you are a judge, runned by them. The mindcontrollers want the judge to deny the litigants rights and dismiss the case, how would you do that with a laser? Would you put the information on a laser and beam it in the direction of the head of the judge? What if the judge bents over and somebody else receives the message? That would be not really reliable, woudn't it? To make sure that the message is received in the proper corrupt heads, it's better they channel that directly in their heads, just as using a cell phone. All they need is the number of the person, and the message (mostly corrupt) is received.

The psychs, mindcontrollers also work with lasers. I know they use lasers to cut out memories of the memory banks of the brains. You know that every person has memory banks in their brains, don't you? If you make a person unconcious and go with the laser over the parts in the brain, that contains short time or long time memory, those memories are gone. And they also know how to fill those banks with false memories.

Barbara Schwarz

<hr> From: BarbaraSchwarz2222@hotmail.com (BarbaraSchwarz)
Subject: Re: Simple Question for Barbara Schwarz
Date: 16 May 2003 13:49:18 -0700
Message-ID: <a6bc00a0.0305161249.5658cd0@posting.google.com>

"ZenX" <nobody@nowhere.net> wrote in message news:<aBwwa.9170$Zo.114658@dfw-read.news.verio.net>...

ZenX is an anonymous guy, who is put up by the still operating German Nazi secret service, to post junk scientifical data. Let's get the misinformation of this "Einstein" straight: those listening devices he described (lasers on windows) to spy on people are not the actual listening devices that the Secret Services are using since centuries, to read peoples minds and to channel them orders.

Only a secret service, infiltrated by the still active German Nazi secret service, would use a spy system that is so unspecifically as listening in on conversations through laser beams at the windows. Implanting people microchips in their ear drums, in their middle ears (they are smaller than a pin head), making them believe they are part of an elite secret service that helps them through life and to get advantages, is how they control people.

What the people are not being told is that they are only attached to the system to be controlled, and that anybody who has their code can and will run them, and that they also being runned by mindcontrollers by hearing inaudible commands through the implants. This is the most serious part about it, because what they hear audible people can reject, but what is sent directly in their subconcious mind, they don't know, but it is having a big effect on them. I posted that already so often: Ear implants are a trap, and people would be much more themselves and a lot better off without them.

It's however much more effective to control people with middle ear implants, channelling them with codes what to think, do, say, instead of just beaming that with a laser. The microchips are also used to read thoughts. Those who know how thorough Germans, esp. their psychiatrists are, and those ear implants are a psych invention, they know they are also thorough in their persecution mania, which means, they would have never stopped at laser beams listening in on people's conversations, they want to run people, all of them, they want to know their inner thoughts, all of them, they want to let nothing open for any co-incident or misinterpretation.

There are also many different lasers out there, and it is also not true that they would all penetrate and split heads. If you get your lasik surgery, the eye is also not cut in pieces, right? It's also not true that light has no mass at all. ZenX furthermore is contraditory. First he posted that light has no mass at all, but later he posted that lasers have so much mass that they burn a whole in somebodys head. You can do a lot of damage with lasers, that is true, but it would be possible to beam data in somebodys head carried on a wave carrier. However, it is not hundred percent sure that this kind of transmittal of data is always received in the head that they wanted to hit with it. That is why the German psychs decided they wanted to be mindcontroller and started to implant microchips in the middle ears of the people.

They work like sort of a hearing aide, but they are much more than that. Connected to a computer, the case officer runs those, he can read their thoughts and he can reach them sending them commands, just as he would use a cell phone.

People have those in their ears, so does ZenX, and the others in that thread that play dumb. I also know where to get the evidence: In a cornoners office, cutting the stuff out of dead human corpses, if nobody wants to come forward alive and confess, this is a way to do it. I bet I come out with a handful of small metal pieces.

You don't need 2 tons equipment to operate a cell phone. Same with the middle ear implants.

ZenX also ignored the fact that lasers are used by psychs to cut out memory from the memory banks of the brain.

Well, I am glad that ZenX never worked for the government. Companies that hire him however are cheated out of their money for asking that dummy for advice.

As far as infiltrators in the Scientology orgs are concerned, they don't work with lasers and listening devices at the windows. They are being runned just like the rest of the world by their case officers through ear implants.

Barbara Schwarz

> I can tell that neither you or Barbara has any technical background
> whatsoever and you sound as ridiculous as her.
>
> Intelligence agencies (and even local PDs) do in fact use lasers but not to
> beam into or against anyones head. They are used as listening devices. They
> use them by focusing the beam on a window in your home or car, which
> vibrates like a diaphram on a speaker in response to voices (or any sound)
> pushing air against it. Those minute vibrations are registered and
> converted to audio just exactly like a telephone or speaker does. The lasers
> used in this application are low energy red (visible) spectrum (between
> 650-680nm) and do not possess any surface "pressure" or heat energy
> whatsoever. They are in the order of .2 to .5 watts. A laser, from visible
> low energy solid state red lasers, through the blue spectrum (lasix) and all
> the way up to million watt, high energy CO2 cutting lasers are only
> collimated(focused), coherent (in sync) light. Light has no mass so
> therefore may impart NO pressure...which would be required in order to
> produce a vibration in a bone or on your eardrum to "hear" anything.
>
> I have a long background in electronics and much experience in
> electro-optical systems including lasers and X-Rays as well as recent and
> past experience in surveillance equipment and methods. I have also worked
> in advanced projects concerning chemical and explosives "sniffers" as well
> as computer and network related security projects. NOT for the government.
> Private companies.
>
> I can tell you right now that if you believe that a laser can be "beamed"
> against someones head to make them hear instructions, you just are dreaming.
> For one, in order to penetrate ones head, a laser would have to be of a
> high energy and BURN a hole through the head. Energy in a laser beam is
> dispersed as HEAT, not pressure. In order to say, resonate on a bone
> surface they would have to be able to vibrate that mass. Lasers cannot and
> never will do that. Lasers do not have "pressure", they are merely coherent
> (in sync) light waves collimated into a tight beam with a low divergence.
> ALL lasers share these properties. Bar none.
>
> I'm sure that someone somewhere would love to have this technology but they
> don't..and they never will with a laser. Thats just stupid and by expousing
> this BS, you seem stupid...or just exceptionally non-technical if I wanted
> to be nice. Heres a tip too. There are no implants that put audio into
> your head unless you are talking about a hearing aid, although that would be
> technically possible. Sound is percieved in humans (and most animals) by air
> pressure vibrating the surface of the eardrum, on into it into the fluid
> there and vibrating the fibralaee in the ear. These are converted by our
> brains to "sound". It is possible to vibrate other bones and "hear" sound
> (see BoneFone) but the energy required to vibrate , say the scapula, is not
> doable from a small, un-noticable device even if it were glued right to the
> surface of it. It would HAVE to be in or very near the inner ear for a
> small device to have enough power to work.
>
> I am just not crazy enough to believe that theres a big conspiracy to
> implant anyone. Governments (especially ours) have many, many methods to
> gather intelligence and enough willing agents to do the work of intelligence
> without implanting our citizenry. Bet your ass that Scientology is
> infiltrated in high places already but not by robots, laser penetration or
> other science fiction. Its human and electronic intelligence.
>
> The only audio weapons in testing as far as I know by our government are
> high energy sound "guns" that use jet engines and ported otputs to disrupt
> (vibrate intensley) our insides. BTW..these sit on trailers and weigh about
> 2 tons. A bit too large to go in my ear anyway.
>
> You don't do the anti-scientology movement any good by putting forth these
> paranoid, and ridiculous ideas that any sane and intelligent person knows
> are total BS.
>
>
>
> "Stefano MacGregor" <esperantujo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:6b9b63b5.0305132204.4108efe9@posting.google.com...
> > Barbara:
> >
> > I've seen a few of your posts about the ear implants that the Nazis
> > use to control people, and was wondering if you know why they use such
> > outdated technology instead of the more modern mind-control devices,
> > like lasers and such.
> >
> > Do they have trouble understanding the new technology, or are they
> > afraid of it for some reason?
> >
> > --
> > Stefano
> > http://www.steve-and-pattie.com/esperantujo/dokument/kiuksenu.html

ZenX

<hr> From: The Raven <raven762038@nospamsbcglobal.net>
Subject: Barbara Schwarz.
Message-ID: <MPG.1930315e8d1b5ebb9896c0@news.dallas.sbcglobal.net>
Organization: None that you know
X-kook: Barbara Schwarz X-UserInfo1: Q[R_PJONGJV_STPXYP^@Z_UJMHT@QDDMEPWXODMMHXMTWA]EP]RAQFW[ML\THRCKV^GGZKJMGV^^_JSCFFUA_QXFGVSCYRPILH]TRVKC^LSN@DX_HCAFX__@J\DAJBVMY\ZWZCZLPA^MVH_P@\\EOMW\YSXHG__IJQY_@M[A[[AXQ_XDSTAR]\PG]NVAQUVM Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 17:46:14 GMT

These are some interesting links. http://www.oha.doe.gov/cases/foia/vfa0700.htm http://www.oha.doe.gov/cases/foia/vfa0701.htm http://www.oha.doe.gov/cases/foia/vfa0671.htm http://www.ncua.gov/ref/foia/FOIA-Decisions/00-0137.htm http://www.ncua.gov/ref/foia/FOIA-Decisions/00-0431.htm

Looks like she got stomped by the courts. I especially like the part about sooper sekrit nazi infiltration of the DOE.

If she's indigent how does she get online? -- The Raven

ICQ #207083138

That is what the German still active secret service also says about me. They want me change so badly, to become like you, Raven.

-Barbara Schwarz alt.religion.scientology 5-15-2003 Message-ID: <a6bc00a0.0305150712.52a9df6d@posting.google.com>

I think you are Dave Shy. You follow me around just as he does, from thread to thread, like a stalker -Barbara Schwarz In alt.religion.scientology 5-15-2003 Message-ID: <a6bc00a0.0305150859.c1c482a@posting.google.com>

Go Back