Kng Peter wrote:

> After a few words back and forth, the OSA guy started making comments based
> upon my PC folder. Now, for those of you who don't know, I was a Scientologist
> for twenty years, gave them a million dollars, and I have a lot of PC folders!
> This guy picked what he thought was the most embarrassing, or demeaning thing
> in my supposedly confidential PC folders, and taunted me with it.
>
> I explained that while much of what was in my PC folder turned out to be past
> life false memory syndrome, I had expected some level of confidentiality. In
> fact, the failure to keep this confidence by an acknowledged member of the
> Church Security Staff (who are not entitled to see or review any guidance
> counseling folder by "Church" "policy") was the act of a morally bankrupt
> group.
>
> I noted that ex-Scientologist critics, such as Jesse Prince (who audited David
> Miscavige), have never stooped to such slimy, creepy behavior.
>
> I thought I would post this little interlude so that all the Scientologists who
> "lurk" here could understand what the current Scientology management is all
> about. To have someone shout supposedly confidential material from one's PC
> Folder on the public street is a disgusting, outrageous experience, but very
> revealing in terms of the low level of ethics of the current Scientology
> management.
>
> It's interesting to note that Scientology is very critical of Psychiatry for
> that profession's low level of ethics. But have you ever heard of a
> psychiatrist shouting confidential session material on the street? No, I'm
> afraid they wouldn't sink that low. It is only the current Scientology
> Management who would demean themselves by doing so.
This is a very common practice of the Co$.

The feeling of having been foolish enough to trust an organization that supposedly was to be your survival . . .

your ~friend~ if you will . . .

and then seeing that promises and ethics that that organization you once loved and felt a part of meant nothing, and in fact all you ever gave would be used against you was very over whelming to a lot of people who have had it done to them that I have talked to.

I really got my eyes opened up to that when helping Margery with the Coalition of Concerned Citizens. I really would like to talk more about it, but without the actual people who went through it speaking up, there is not much point.

However, it is a common occurance that Co$ and it's members used, use now, and always will use.

Lies, betrayal, accusation, mockery . . .

the twisted LRH inspired ~self-righteiousness~ . . .

that is the lot of Co$ ethics.

Here is an excerpt from a posting made by Gerry Armstrong which also attests to the deception and lies that the Co$ will claim regarding your PC and auditing files:

Subject: Re: Is this really a Parody? Was Minton instead of Clinton
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 19:56:39 -0700
From: Gerry Armstrong <armstrong@dowco.com>
Auditing is Scientology's psychotherapeutic processing, which it claims produces increased abilities and awareness.

Statements made by a person being audited are recorded by an "auditor." These statements, which include the person's innermost thoughts, embarrassing incidents from his past, his sexual history, acts which might be legally prosecutable, etc. are available to and used by the intelligence personnel and leaders of the organization for non-therapeutic purposes, such as domination, intel operations or blackmail. Scientology promotes to the public that statements made in auditing are confidential.

They are not.

[end quote] Anybody who believes Co$ about the confidentiality of auditing files . . .

or ~any~ files or information . . .

is being deceived.

Not knowing is one thing . . .

but now all reading here enough have been exposed to knowing that confidentiality means nothing to the Co$.

What I find really amazing . . .

but that speaks volumes regarding the truth of the soul of the Co$ . . .

is that with all these ~crimes~ committed by beings . . .

as long as you stay a true blue willingly blinded devotee to the Co$ . . .

The Co$ never really cares and your ~crimes~ are safely kept . . .

but the minute you become a Co$ declared enemy . . .

then . . .

and only then . . .

do any of these ~crimes~ matter.

ARC, Beverly

Go Back