CMO UK ETHICS ORDER 509
July 27, 1993
INFO: CMO INT CMO UK OSA INT SNR HCO INT All BASE ORGS
RPF ASSIGNMENT CATHY SPROULE DSA SAINT HILL
Cathy Sproule is hereby assigned to the RPF per Fa 3434RD THE REHABILITATION PROJECT FORCE as being an overt product maker and a non producer.
Cathy was recently found responsible for creating a Hill 10 of magnitude which has serious potential of endangering the base which is having to be handled by several executive staff members on a bypass.
Cathy had received warning three weeks prior to the situation occurring, however she did not take action to handle as would have been expected from her hat, instead neglecting it until it had become a major threat to a current vital handling affecting public inflow, security of staff and expansion of Scientology in UK.
Study of Cathy's history reveals that she has a longstanding and unhandled scene of not wearing her hat resulting in flaps requiring intervention.
In May this year she brought a reporter into the AOSH UK registration office, unnanounced [sic] and without prior coordination. Cathy asked questions of [sic] the registrars which could have been misconstrued by the reporter present, resulting in possible out PR for the Church.
Also earlier this year, valuable evidence that could have been used against an enemy of the Church was allowed to be destroyed, hindering executive efforts to apply proper justice to him.
Cathy repeatedly failed to ensure that routine funding was provided to pay professional services which were required regarding her zone of responsibility.
There are numerous other situations involving public and staff which have been mishandled or neglected that fall under Cathy's hat as DSA to handle.
Despite repeated ethics, justice and correction, Cathy has continued to act in a neglectful and treasonous manner on her post.
By these acticons, Cathy has demonstrated her treasonability to the Sea Org. It is hoped that she will take this opportunity to redeem herself on the Rehabilitation Project Force. She may request a Committee of Evidence if she so wishes.
Deborah Sardner D/CD Internal OSA UK
for Lt Jan Jansen CO CMO UK
Authorized by LRH COMM CMO UK
for CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS EDUCATION COLLEGE INC.
COSRECI:JJ:JJ:DG:dg:jj
From: deomorto@my-deja.com (Deomorto)
Subject: Re: RPF Assignment - Cathy Sproule
Date: 31 Dec 2002 11:49:28 -0800
Message-ID: <cde9ed89.0212311149.35a97edd@posting.google.com>
martinottmann@yahoo.com (Martin Ottmann) wrote in message news:<71d327bb.0212310539.4a760d8d@posting.google.com>...
Poor old Cathy - nice lady. she was much happier as the AG UK's communicator back in the old days.
This order is interesting - it basically comes under the heading of "there has been horrendous fuck up and someone has to pay" because in the actual ethics order there really aren't any RPF type things cited though the person writing it does try real hard. It looks to me that it was decided that she should go to the RPF and then this "Sardner"
person was told to write it up.
I have made a couple of comments interspersed in the EO - I would be interested in Lulubelle's opinion.
> SEA ORGANIZATION
>
> CMO UK ETHICS ORDER 509
>
> July 27, 1993
>
> INFO: CMO INT
> CMO UK
> OSA INT
> SNR HCO INT
> All BASE ORGS
>
> RPF ASSIGNMENT
> CATHY SPROULE
> DSA SAINT HILL
>
> Cathy Sproule is hereby assigned to the RPF per Fa 3434RD THE
> REHABILITATION PROJECT FORCE as being an overt product maker and a non
> producer.
>
> Cathy was recently found responsible for creating a Hill 10 of
> magnitude which has serious potential of endangering the base which is
> having to be handled by several executive staff members on a bypass.
A bit later in this EO the writer says that Cathy didn't secure the funding needed and so on - it is interesting that the people who would have had to approve the additional funding are the very people the writer now claims are "having to bypass".
Nothing like having a patsy to blame sez I.
>
> Cathy had received warning three weeks prior to the situation
> occurring, however she did not take action to handle as would have
> been expected from her hat, instead neglecting it until it had become
> a major threat to a current vital handling affecting public inflow,
> security of staff and expansion of Scientology in UK.
Does anyone know what this meltdown in the UK was all about? CMO Finance mission busily nailing the CO AOSH UK, the DSA getting RPFed, the words "Hill 10" being waffled around like some incantation?
It looks to me that there must have been some monumental OSA screw up having to do with the UK Government - OSA UK is funded by AOSH UK which obviously was not doing very well on the old GI given the comments about crew not getting paid and so on. And, given the comments in this EO about not securing funding it looks to me that they didn't pay the lawyers.
>
> Study of Cathy's history reveals that she has a longstanding and
> unhandled scene of not wearing her hat resulting in flaps requiring
> intervention.
Now this is priceless because if this were true - what was she doing on post and why would you not send the people who were supposed to be supervising this non-hat wearing flap maker?
>
> In May this year she brought a reporter into the AOSH UK registration
> office, unnanounced [sic] and without prior coordination. Cathy asked
> questions of [sic] the registrars which could have been misconstrued
> by the reporter present, resulting in possible out PR for the Church.
Now that has to be one of the biggest pieces of doubletalk around. You will note that there actually doesn't appear to be anything bad that actually happened just "could have been misconstrued which would have.." when you boil this down it actually reads to be nothing at all.
>
> Also earlier this year, valuable evidence that could have been used
> against an enemy of the Church was allowed to be destroyed, hindering
> executive efforts to apply proper justice to him.
Note that this doesn't say that Cathy destroyed anything, nor indeed that she even ordered it or knew about it. This, in football terms, would be "piling on"
>
> Cathy repeatedly failed to ensure that routine funding was provided to
> pay professional services which were required regarding her zone of
> responsibility.
See my comment earlier. Presumably then Cathy should have taken out some kind of personal loan to pay this?
>
> There are numerous other situations involving public and staff which
> have been mishandled or neglected that fall under Cathy's hat as DSA
> to handle.
Ooh a generality in an Ethics Order - damn this person was desperate indeed to try and come up with something.
>
> Despite repeated ethics, justice and correction, Cathy has continued
> to act in a neglectful and treasonous manner on her post.
Amazing - Hubbard Management tech at its very best!! Here we have all
these supervisory people, layer upon layer of management, the
technology, the resources and yet, obviously this person was left on
post (presumably for a long period of time given the "repeated"
comment) when she could not do it, was producing bad products was in fact, a traitor! And this is the crap that WISE tries to hype? Sheesh.
>
> By these acticons, Cathy has demonstrated her treasonability to the
> Sea Org. It is hoped that she will take this opportunity to redeem
> herself on the Rehabilitation Project Force. She may request a
> Committee of Evidence if she so wishes.
>
> Deborah Sardner
> D/CD Internal OSA UK
>
> for
> Lt Jan Jansen
> CO CMO UK
>
> Authorized by
> LRH COMM CMO UK
>
> for
> CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
> RELIGIOUS EDUCATION COLLEGE INC.
>
> COSRECI:JJ:JJ:DG:dg:jj
gawd what a pathetic ethics order. I could do better than that.
deo
Go Back
to Shy David's Scientology Page.