http://www.suburbia.net/~fun/scn/fun/osa-points.txt

This documents how OSA is to track "enemies" via a point system. How many points can YOU rack up against OSA? Post your results! This posting and my others have me well above 20 unhandled "points!"

----

           INVESTIGATIONS SECTION

     INVESTIGATIONS SECTION VFPs: 1.  A FULLY ESTABLISHED,
 PRODUCTIVE DSA INVEST SECTION WHICH BRINGS ABOUT THE FAILURE
OF INFLUENCE OF HOSTILE GROUPS OR PERSONS.

     2.  THE REQUIRED INFORMATION FURNISHED TO GUIDE THE
PROGRESS OF SCIENTOLOGY.

  1.  TOTAL UNHANDLED ATTACKS AND ATTACKERS (GDS)
      Ref: Advice updated RE GUARD STAT
      Advice 27 March 72 COUNTER ATTACK TACTICS
      Advice 28 March 72 INTELLIGENCE PRINCIPLES

      This is a guard stat with 0 at the top.

     This stat is counted:

     1 point for every attacker

     Plus:

      1 point if the attack is local

     2 points if the attack is regional

     4 points if the attack is national

     The points remain on the stat until handled.

     The category of attacks are listed below:

     1.  TM infringement, each TM Infringement  counted  as  per
     the  TM  Infringers  handled  stat  of Invest.  (NOTE: if a
     report is received of a possible TM Infringer, this must be
     verfied  as  inactive  within 4 weeks or it gets counted on
     this stat as a TM Infringer until verified as  inactive  or
     until  handled.)
     2.  External Influences - where an org is being  influenced
     by  External  Influences  and  this  is not handled by OSA.
     Also each External Influence  who  has  not  been  handled.
      This  would include any actions done by TM Infringers which
     affect the org or the field.
     3.  A suit filed against a "Church" entity or individual.
     4.  Any lost suit.
     5.  A print media hit - a newspaper or magazine story which
     is an attack.
     6.   An  attack  on the TV by an individual eg.  an entheta
     source who has gotten on a  TV  talk  show  to  forward  an
     attack, or on a radio show.
     7.  A TV program that is an attack on the "Church".
     8.   Legislation  proposed  in  any  area  that hinders our
     operations in that area.
     9.   Legislation  passed  in  any  area  that  hinders  our
     operations in that area.
     10.  An entheta book published.
     11.  Any legislative or governmental inquiry initiated into
     the "Church".
     12.   Any   Scientology  activity   closed   down   through
     opposition actions.
      13.  Government restrictions imposed upon the "Church".
     14.  A legal case not involving the "Church" but resulting in
     a judgement that is an attack upon the "Church".
     15.  A civil suit filed on the "Church".
     16.  A civil judgement against the "Church"
     17.  A deprogramming attempt on a Scientologist.
     18.  A penal (criminal) complaint against  a  "Church"  or  a
     staff member filed.
     19.   A  penal  (criminal)  complaint against a "Church" or a
     staff member being acted on.

     For every attack, the attack goes on the stat with a point
     value according to whether it is a local, regional or
     national attack plus the attacker behind the attack goes on
     as an additional point if not already on the list.

     When the actual situation is HANDLED, by terminatedly
     handling the attacker the points come off the stat (one
     attacker may be behind a number of attacks and when
      handled, the accumulated points for the attacks originated
     from that person would all come off the stat).  The
     exception would be if an Attacker is verified as being
     handled yet an outstanding attack still exists in some
     form, that attack remains on the list until handled (while
     the Attacker and any handled attacks come off the stat).

     Clearly, the Attacker MUST be correctly isolated and named
     before he can be handled and this stat goes up.

     For purposes of calculating the list of UATTACKS to begin
     with, each DSA Invest Officer should list out the major
     attacks connected to each of its current attackers going back
     to the point when they started attacking (in many cases this
     can be several years or even a decade - for the initial
     calculation of this stat it is not intended to get into a
     huge administrative cycle and some approximation of attacks
     based on existing file data may be necessary).  Each attack
     will have to be classified as to whether it was a local,
      regional or national attack for purposes of calculating the
     stat.

     Each DSA Invest Officer is to format their UATTACKS breakdown
     by listing out the names of the attackers with the attacks
     under each name, with the attack designated as to whether it
     was a local, regional or national attack.  The attacker with
     the most attacks should go at the top of the list.  The
     purpose of this admin system is to be able to see at a glance
     who we are getting the most attacks from.  If there is more
     than one attacker behind an attack, then that attack would be
     placed under the name of the major attacker with the name of
     the second attacker in parenthesis next to the attack so it
     is clear that the attack would not come off the list until
     both attackers are terminatedly handled.  If the major
     attacker gets terminatedly handled, the attack would then be
     placed under the name of the second attacker.

     If there are attacks for which there are no known
      attackers, these are placed at the end of the list until
     the attackers behind them are known.

     Following is an example to illustrate this:

          1) JOE BLOGS = 1 POINT
          A) LA TIMES ENTHETA ARTICLE 15 JAN 1980 - REGIONAL
             = 2 POINTS
          B) ENTHETA TV APPEARANCE 1 MAY 1982 - LOCAL = 1 POINT
          C) ENTHETA BOOK "CULTS" 1984  (FRED FRAME ALSO BEHIND
             IT) - DISTRIBUTED NATIONALLY = 4 POINTS

                                    Subtotal = 8 POINTS

          2) FRED FRAME = 1 POINT
          A) ENTHETA LECTURE BOSTON UNIV 15 DEC 1983 - LOCAL =
             1 POINT
          B) DEPRO ATTEMPT ON SUE SMITH MARCH 1984 - LOCAL = 1
             POINT
           C) 14 MEDIA ATTACKS 1976-1980 - ALL REGIONAL = 28
             POINTS

                                    Subtotal = 31

          ATTACKS WITH NO KNOWN ATTACKERS:

          A) 12 JUNE 1981 RAID ON MISSION - LOCAL = 1 point
          B) JULY 1987 ATTEMPTED DEPROGRAMMING ON BILL SMITH -
             LOCAL = 1 POINT

                                    Subtotal = 2

          Etc.

     Once formatted as per the above, each DSA Invest
     Officer should forward this breakdown to the OSA Cont where a
     master Continental list of UATTACKS will also be kept and
     updated.  Each cont should have a break down the UATTACKS by
      the DSA office responsible for handling each attack/attacker.

  2.    NUMBER OF ATTACKS PREDICTED AND REPORTED PLUS WHOS
         FOUND BY APPROVED ESTIMATE OR EVAL. (GDS)

         Ref:  Dispatch RE: NEW STAT
               OSA NW ORDER 42 INTELLIGENCE, ITS ROLE
               OSA NW ORDER 35 INTELLIGENCE, ESTIMATIONS
                               AND PREDICTIONS
               HCO PL 17 FEB 66 PUBLIC INVESTIGATION SECTION
               Advice 28 March 72 INTELLIGENCE PRINCIPLES

     This stat is a weekly point value for the total number of
     threatened attacks found by Defensive minus points for
     any unpredicted attack or any attack which has been
     predicted which then goes unhandled and occurs despite
     the prediction.  The stat is not accumulative.  The
      points are valued as follows:

          Local Attack - 1 point
          Regional Attack - 5 points
          National Attack - 10 points

     An unpredicted attack, or unhandled predicted attack counts
     minus 10 times the above point value.

     An attack is defined per the definitions of an attack as
     covered under the UATTACKS statistic.

     A bonus of 10 points is given for any Who found by AVC
     approved evaluation and 5 points for a Who found by
     approved estimate.

     As can be seen, for a prediction to be viable it must be
     predicted in sufficient time to handle the matter before it
     becomes a full blown attack and a handling must be worked
      out and exchanged.  The actual handling may be executed by
     Support Unit, Staff Security Sub-Unit, HCO, Dept of I&R,
     Legal Off or PR Off, but the Defensive Unit is responsible
     for ensuring that the prediction product is actually of
     quality and exchangeable and utilized to beneficial result of
     preventing the attack.

     To be counted, the prediction must be reported in writing
     in some manner to the proper publics who should know and/or
     act on the data (which reporting may even be in the form of
     a stat breakdown if it is clearly communicated in an
     exchangeable manner with sufficient time, place, form and
     event to be understood.)

     The stat reflects external prediction as well as internal
     prediction lines.

     Internal prediction activities must be aligned with the
     purpose and functions of the Office of Special Affairs and
      Departments of Special Affairs, which are external facing
     units.  It is the Staff Security Sub-Unit that monitors the
     prediction and handling of matters which interface between
     internal and external.  The Department of Special Affairs is
     interested in matters which if not handled could result in
     external attacks, different from security situations which
     are simply an HCO matter - for example a PTS Type A situation
     which just needs to get a standard handling (and would
     concern us only if there are enemy connections or indicators
     of something that will turn into an external attack unless
     handled); whereas a PTS C found on lines would of course be
     of interest to us.  Valid Staff Security matters include such
     things as detection and handling of enemy infiltration;
     detection and handling of the source of external influences
     preying on the backs of orgs, etc.

     Key references on Staff Security functions and duties and
     areas of prediction activity which would validly be
     represented on the WHOATTACKSF stat, and which deliniate
     matters which are the hat and function of HCOs are:

     SPD 2 OCT 88 ORGANIZATIONAL SECURITY
     SO ED 4234 HCO AND OSA COORDINATION ON SECURITY AND
     INVESTIGATION MATTERS
     OSA NW ORDER 42 INTELLIGENCE, ITS ROLE
     OSA NW ORDER 64 RUNDOWN ON INTELLIGENCE
     HCO PL 21 APRIL 70 FIELD ETHICS

  3.   NUMBER OF OUTSTANDING THREATS (GUARD STAT)
     Ref: Advice 16 Feb 82, NEW STAT

     This stat is a guard stat and is the total outstanding
     threats.  This would cover any predicted attack about which
     information has been received.  Once the threat is handled it
     comes off the stat.

  4.   NUMBER OF OUTSTANDING SECURITY THREATS (GUARD STAT)
     Ref: Advice 16 Feb 82, NEW STAT

     This stat measures the total amount of outstanding security
     threats and risks and is an upside down graph with zero at
     the top.  A security situation for OSA/DSA is as defined
     under the WHOATTACKS Found stat.

  5.   NUMBER OF THREATS SEEN, THREATENED OR REPORTED
     Ref: Advice 16 Feb 82, NEW STAT

     Per the above listed advice, this stat shows the amount of
     security threats that are found and reported.  A security
     situation for OSA/DSA is as defined under the WHOATTACKS
     Found stat.

  6.   NUMBER OF THREATS HANDLED

     Per the above listed advice, this stat shows the amount of
     threats that are handled.

  7.   COMPLAINTS ACTED UPON
     Ref: HCO PL 17 Feb 66 PUBLIC INVESTIGATION SECTION:

     This stats measures the number of complaints against
     attackers that were acted upon by authorities.

     This is defined as the number of complaints filed with
     anyone who is in a position of authority and acts upon the
     complaint and thus impinges on an attacker (e.g.  judicial,
     governmental, civil, employer, landlord, etc).  Each time
     the complaint is acted on counts 1.  Not cumulative.

  8.   NUMBER OF OPPOSITION ADVANTAGES LOST
     Ref: HCO PL 16 Feb 69 Iss II, BATTLE TACTICS

     This stat measures the advantages of the opposition which
     were lost due to the application of standard Invest tech.

      Total number of advantages lost by the opposition that week
     as a direct or indirect result of Invest actions.  See the
     above HCO PL for a description of the type of activities
     that would count on this stat.  Not cumulative.

     DEFINITIONS:

     OPPOSITION: A person or group actively opposing the
     Founder, Scientology or the "Church" of Scientology or its
     principles or activities and/or threatening its survival or
     expansion.

  9.   DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE OBTAINED AND USED
     Ref: HCO PL 17 Feb 66 PUBLIC INVESTIGATION SECTION
     Advice 8 June 73 INTELLIGENCE, ITS ROLE

     This stat measures the evidence that has been obtained
     against attackers and was put to use.

      Documented evidence obtained that indicates a crime or
     useable evidence regarding a Who or an opposition terminal,
     and is deemed useable by counsel, PR or Legal.

     This stat is counted on the basis of one point for each
     evidence of a crime documented deemed useable by counsel,
     PR or Legal.

     A 5 point bonus is given for each piece of documented
     evidence that is USED by counsel, PR or Legal.  (If the
     data contained in the documented evidence is used, it can
     still be counted as a DOCEV, whether the actual document is
     used or only the data.) Not cumulative.

Go Back