Reposted: Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology From: henri@netcom.com (henry) Subject: WOLLERSHEIM THREAD REPOST! Cc: referen@ibm.net Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) X-Editor-Wrapper: SigEd V1.2.1, Add .sig and PGP flexibility to posts. Date: Wed, 6 Sep 1995 00:54:04 GMT Lines: 1567 Sender: henri@netcom.netcom.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In article <42fmhu$2c86@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net>, Diane Richardson wrote: >>>Although someone else has suggested that Chris is actually Eugene >>>Ingram, I'm casting my vote for Kendrick Moxon. Moxon is the CoS >>>lawyer most closely associated with CoS PI dirty tricks, as >>>detailed in an a few affidavits that have shown up around here. >>also, moxon has actually posted to the group personally to >>dead-agent wollersheim. >Yep. Does anyone still have a copy of those post?. There were >only a couple, as far as I remember. I'd really like to compare >the texts of those posts with Chrissy's. here's the whole thread, which AFAIK has all of moron's posts. - ----- Article 103265 of alt.religion.scientology: Xref: netcom.com alt.religion.scientology:103265 Path: netcom.com!ix.netcom.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!zib-berlin.de!unlisys!berlin!tilman From: tilman@berlin.snafu.de (Tilman Hausherr) Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Thread repost: Where in the world is David Miscavige ? Date: 24 Aug 1995 21:17:53 GMT Organization: Xenu's ranch Lines: 1515 Message-ID: <41iqa1$mbl@unlisys.unlisys.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: berlin.snafu.de X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] From: Bob Penny Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Miscavige on the run... Date: Mon, 13 Feb 95 13:50:31 -0500 MISCAVIGE ON THE RUN FROM PROCESS SERVERS WOLLERSHEIM OFFERS $3,000 FOR HELP SERVING MISCAVIGE In the last several weeks, private investigators and process servers have twice tried to serve David Miscavige, Scientology's absolute dictator, with a subpoena in the Wollersheim collection case. Miscavige would not come out of the LA complex to accept it. Instead, he sent his security people to intimidate the process servers. I now vow that it is not a question of if Miscavige will be served in the Wollersheim collection, but only how soon. To make this happen quickly, I have offered cash awards to whatever private investigator or process serving company finally serves him. I will keep hiring additional serving companies until we are successful. To further assist my process servers, I will give $3,000 to any individual inside or outside of Scientology who gives us Miscavige's location or changing locations if it results in us successfully serving him. I believe there are many people within Scientology (former GO and OSA people, the Hubbard family, and others) who will anonymously give us the information we need to serve him because it will benefit them as well. Until he accepts service, Miscavige will not be able to leave any Scientology compound, travel, or attend any Hollywood or Scientology function anywhere in the world without our process servers being hot on his trail. David Miscavige has become a prisoner of his own organization's bad debts and his desperation to avoid revealing information about them. But why the desperation? Miscavige was the individual personally responsible for ordering the stripping and gutting of $500 million in assets out of the "Church" of Scientology of California in the MCCS and CSO projects. Miscavige is the person who seized control of Scientology and its assets from the Hubbard family. When Miscavige is served, he personally will have to answer where every dollar has gone and how it was done. When he does this he is trapped because his story will not be what actually happened and the Wollersheim case has too many witnesses and too much evidence to show what really happened. Because of what will come out about his takeover of Scientology and transfer of assets, I completely believe that Miscavige will face felony criminal charges. The disastrous PR for Scientology that these new exposures will create will force the organization to sacrifice Miscavige "for the good of the organization" just as Miscavige used exposure of Mary Sue Hubbard's criminal actions to force her out "to save the Scientology organization." HELP ME SERVE Miscavige. Get me any information that could help our process servers and receive a $3,000 reward. Be a part of the team that brings justice to Miscavige and Scientology. Please copy and post this message anywhere it might assist us in getting the information needed to catch Miscavige. Reply via e-mail to lawrence@rmii.com or by U.S. Mail to 601 16th St. #C-217, Golden, Colorado, 80401. Lawrence Wollersheim From: wbarwell@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (William Barwell) Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Re: Where in the world is David Miscavige? ($3000 reward) Date: 23 Feb 1995 09:11:33 -0600 In article , Bob Penny wrote: >"WHERE IN THE WORLD IS DAVID MISCAVIGE?" >$3,000 REWARD, UPDATE #2 > >I want to thank all of you who responded by name or anonymously >with helpful and ingenious location, tactic, and resource information >to assist the Wollersheim case's attempt to subpoena David Miscavige. >Because of time constraints I cannot respond individually to >everyone's suggestions so I will keep you all informed by way >of these updates. > >One suggestions was to use fake Scientologists and/or Scientologists >in doubt or just about to defect to serve Miscavige inside Scientology's >compounds or at Scientology's public events. Another person >suggested that we hire world renowned process servers. You >can be sure that we will overlook no opportunity anywhere in >the world to serve Miscavige and we will use whatever process >server(s) it takes to get the job done. I am as serious about >this as I was about the 14 years of litigation it took to win >my case against Scientology. Well, seeing as Davie is the key CEO of a whole buncha CoS entities, it would seem to be that there is important business he needs to sign off on. So he would have to show up to put his legal signature on those things that demand his, and only his signature. Now all one has to do is discover such neccesary paperwork and make sure that the writs are taped firmly on top, or so it would seem. Find that he must attend to personally and find out what the law says you have to do to legally serve him and use that neccesary business as the bait to draw him in. Here in Texas, I am told you can make three attempts to serve and then IF you know the guys whereabouts, his house which he refuses to leave when you knock or where he parks his car at work, you tape the writ there on the door of either and legally he is served. Find the paper work he MUST sign and make him come get it. Pope Charles SubGenius Pope Of Houston Slack! From: "M. Council" Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Re: Where in the world is David Miscavige? ($3000 reward) Date: Thu, 23 Feb 1995 15:11:35 -0500 On 23 Feb 1995, William Barwell wrote: > In article , > Bob Penny wrote: > >"WHERE IN THE WORLD IS DAVID MISCAVIGE?" > >$3,000 REWARD, UPDATE #2 > > > >I want to thank all of you who responded by name or anonymously > >with helpful and ingenious location, tactic, and resource information > >to assist the Wollersheim case's attempt to subpoena David Miscavige. > >Because of time constraints I cannot respond individually to > >everyone's suggestions so I will keep you all informed by way > >of these updates. > > > Well, seeing as Davie is the key CEO of a whole buncha CoS entities, > it would seem to be that there is important business he needs to sign > off on. So he would have to show up to put his legal signature on those > things that demand his, and only his signature. > Now all one has to do is discover such neccesary paperwork and > make sure that the writs are taped firmly on top, or so it would seem. > > Find that he must attend to personally and find out what the law says you > have to do to legally serve him and use that neccesary business as the > bait to draw him in. Here in Texas, I am told you can make three attempts > to serve and then IF you know the guys whereabouts, his house which he > refuses to leave when you knock or where he parks his car at work, you > tape the writ there on the door of either and legally he is served. > Find the paper work he MUST sign and make him come get it. I've worked as a part-time process server in the state of FLorida for a few years. The three-times rule applies here, too. You don't even have to get the actual person, just anyone who answers the door who lives there and is over 16 years old. You no longer have to actually touch the person with the piece of paper; if they refuse to open the door, you can drop it on their doorstep, announce loudly that the person is served. If they don't pick it up, it'll be their problem when they don't appear in court. - --------------------------------------m. council, human being Hell, if you understood everything I say, you'd council@luna.cas.usf.edu be me. -Miles Davis - ------------------------------------------------------------- Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.censorship,alt.conspiracy,alt.current-events.net-abuse,alt.law-enforcement,alt.mindcontrol,alt.recovery.religion,alt.religion.christian,alt.society.mental-health,alt.support.ex-cult,comp.org.eff.talk,misc.legal,news.admin.misc,sci.psychology,talk.religion.misc From: moxbart@netcom.com (Kendrick Moxom) Subject: MESSAGE TO LARRY WOLLERSHEIM Date: Thu, 16 Feb 1995 08:36:28 GMT Dear Larry Wollersheim, I saw the February 13, 1995 notice you posted which libels the Church of Scientology of California and Mr. David Miscavige. Having been a director of Church of Scientology of California and having testified in that capacity in your trial in 1986, I know first hand that your posting is full of lies. Your posting attempts to encourage others to join you in a conspiracy to commit illegal acts by offering a "bounty" on a person. Your posting is false, defamatory and an obvious extension of your usual pattern of attempting to bilk people out of their work, their money, their time and their integrity. I demand that you cease repetition of your lies and your unlawful acts. Before innocent readers take to heart any of your allegations it is important for them to know some basic facts about your integrity, your lack of responsibility and your sanity. Your lack of integrity is underscored by the manner in which you chose to dodge the draft. The story is well-known of your placing peanut butter in your underwear and running down the halls of the draft board sampling the peanut butter in order to fake your way out of military service. Thousands of people at that time either served their country responsibly, or were honest enough to state their views as conscientious objectors. You chose a dishonest way out. As to your lack of responsibility, I am amazed that you would lure unsuspecting net users into joining you in your culpability with a promise to pay them money. If you are advertising that you will pay someone for their services, you should first disclose to them the trail of creditors you have left from LA to Aspen -- the list of people you ripped off which goes on and on -- and who you have assiduously sought to avoid. You ripped off the Impact Southern Company who for years has had an uncollected judgment against you for $20,000. You ripped off American Factors after you skipped town owing them major money from your business collapse. You ripped off Richard Simmons' concept of hand-weights for your failed "Fit- Stiks" scheme. You defrauded investors in your "Aspen Diet" financial scams. All of these people were convinced by your lies to do your bidding to aid some scheme from which only you could benefit or from which you were able to harm someone who you perceived had slighted you. If you want to aid "justice," just let your creditors know where you are. They'll exact financial justice, if they think you even possess $3,000. As to your sanity, nothing reflects your delusory state of mind better than the time you "hand-delivered" a letter to Church counsel in New York by jumping out of a waiting elevator, flinging your letter towards the receptionist and instantly disappearing again behind the closing elevator doors. In it you voice your "realization" that the Church of Scientology is "some type of intelligence agency project itself, or a renegade think tank field experiment." You posit that the mysterious goverment agency "periodically let[s] the lower agencies publicly rough up Scientology to help maintain the great religion cover." Against this backdrop, you attempt to mislead net users with false information about alleged attempts to serve process on Mr. David Miscavige. As you and your attorneys know, Mr. Miscavige does not live or work at the Church of Scientology location where you claimed your process server tried to serve him. Your attempts at service at that location were nothing more than meaningless posturing and malicious harassment. You also know that the process server did not even have a lawful subpoena and that your attorney withdrew the bogus subpoena when it was pointed out to him that the subpoena was illegal and unenforceable. Indeed, your harassment of Mr. Miscavige is simply unconscionable. Mr. Miscavige is not connected with the Church of Scientology of California. He is not an officer, director, managing agent or employee of that organization and has nothing whatsoever to do with it. You have never met Mr. Miscavige, never spoken to him and have never corresponded with him in any way. So, get real! Imbedded in your defamatory remarks are the intentional misstatements that the Church of Scientology of California and Mr. Miscavige have something to hide with respect to the Church's financial transactions. This is a complete fabrication on your part. As you are well aware, all of the Church's financial records have been made available for scrutiny by the Internal Revenue Service, with every transaction carefully dissected and projects such as MCCS thoroughly examined. At the end of this extremely detailed review, the IRS gave the Churches of Scientology a clean bill of health -- no strange dealings, no improper transfers, no inurement. The Church, as found by the IRS, is organized and operated exclusively for religious and charitable purposes. Anyone with a basic understanding of corporate and non-profit corporate matters will therefore see that your allegation that Mr. Miscavige seized control of the Church from the Hubbard family is totally ludicrous. Your attempts to smear Mr. Miscavige are as actionable as they are incredible. You falsely claim that Mr. Miscavige is hiding. Indeed the opposite is true. You are hiding so thoroughly that you have to post these messages from a hidden box belonging to someone else. As one of your many former attorneys explained, you hide so thoroughly that even your counsel have had difficulty contacting you directly. Instead, the attorney had to place a call to an answering machine, which would then get picked up by someone who would send a message to a beeper, after which you would call in to get a message. It is also no surprise that you would accuse someone of avoiding service of process, since that has been your own established operating basis. Indeed, in one instance, you were so intent to evade service of process that you threw your car into reverse, backed up a hill and smashed into a neighbor's car. In short, your assertions relating to David Miscavige and the Church of Scientology of California are false; your offer of a "bounty" is unlawful and potentially criminal; your solicitation of others to participate in this bounty is potentially a violation of state and local laws; and, most egregious, your claimed need for such assistance is phony from start to finish: you never had a lawful subpoena and you have no ability to acquire one. I demand that you withdraw your scandalous offer and your defamatory statements before people are forced to take legal action against you. Lynn R. Farny Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.censorship,alt.conspiracy,alt.current-events.net-abuse,alt.law-enforcement,alt.mindcontrol,alt.recovery.religion,alt.religion.christian,alt.society.mental-health,alt.support.ex-cult,comp.org.eff.talk,misc.legal,news.admin.misc,sci.psychology,talk.religion.misc From: noring@netcom.com (Jon Noring) Subject: CoS Internet Campaign Starts (was Re: MESSAGE TO LARRY WOLLERSHEIM) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 1995 15:57:25 GMT [I'm assuming that Mr. Farny is the author of the original post, not Mr. Moxom] In article moxbart@netcom.com (Kendrick Moxom) writes: >Dear Larry Wollersheim, > > I saw the February 13, 1995 notice you posted which >libels the Church of Scientology of California and Mr. David >Miscavige. Having been a director of Church of Scientology of >California and having testified in that capacity in your trial >in 1986, I know first hand that your posting is full of lies. Hopefully in what follows you will give objective evidence that it was full of lies. I look forward to your evidence as you are the first high-level CoS individual posting in an official capacity to Usenet and the Internet. Welcome. And of course, I hope you present yourself well as first impressions are the most important, and I'm sure the Church of Scientology wants to develop a good relationship with the Internet and with Usenet. I really look forward to what is written below. I will comment along the way as how I believe most of the readers on Usenet would also comment on it. Of course, I encourage others here to make their comments as well. And of course, I will not pull punches in my criticism, just as a cursory look at what you wrote shows that you don't pull any punches either. We have something in common. > Your posting attempts to encourage others to join you in >a conspiracy to commit illegal acts by offering a "bounty" on >a person. Your posting is false, defamatory and an obvious >extension of your usual pattern of attempting to bilk people >out of their work, their money, their time and their >integrity. I demand that you cease repetition of your lies >and your unlawful acts. Take him to court if he did anything illegal. Why waste your time here? The Internet and Usenet is not the proper legal forum to sue someone. After all, it's what the courts think, not the Internet, that is really important, isn't it? > Before innocent readers take to heart any of your >allegations it is important for them to know some basic facts >about your integrity, your lack of responsibility and your >sanity. Oh, Oh, I see "Dead Agenting" beginning. [According to the many legal affidavits filed under oath by former CoS staff, it is part of CoS policy to *always* attack the integrity of their opponents, called dead agenting. According to the same documents, the honorable L. Ron Hubbard himself ordered it and thus it is part of their religious "canon".] I hope every "innocent" reader sees through this. Notice the following itself borders on the libelous and that Mr. Wollersheim could likewise sue Mr. Farny for libel. It's interesting how Mr. Farny believes that Wollersheim attacks against the entity called the "Church" is worse than Mr. Farny attacking the integrity of an individual who firmly believes in what he is doing. Mr. Farny, we in the Internet urge you to retract your libelous statements against Mr. Wollersheim, or prove them with objective evidence in an irrefutable way. We, the Internet will work with the Church of Scientology for any legitimate legal issues they may have with regard to the propagation of your copyrighted materials on the Internet, but this does not help your case by any means. > Your lack of integrity is underscored by the manner in >which you chose to dodge the draft. The story is well-known >of your placing peanut butter in your underwear and running >down the halls of the draft board sampling the peanut butter >in order to fake your way out of military service. Thousands >of people at that time either served their country >responsibly, or were honest enough to state their views as >conscientious objectors. You chose a dishonest way out. This has nothing to do with anything. Remove such silliness as it shows you are not interested in solving anything legitimate. You are just driving away what few "innocent" people on the Internet are left. I'm sure you don't want to do that because the Internet is the sum total of 10's of thousands of net.activists and their "energy" (I'm just one -- others will take my place should I fall or leave -- and I'm considered one of the nicer ones to deal with -- you don't want to mess with Guido *smile*). You *don't* want the Internet against you as it is not pretty. Let's work together. > As to your lack of responsibility, I am amazed that you >would lure unsuspecting net users into joining you in your >culpability with a promise to pay them money. If you are >advertising that you will pay someone for their services, you >should first disclose to them the trail of creditors you have >left from LA to Aspen -- the list of people you ripped off >which goes on and on -- and who you have assiduously sought to >avoid. You ripped off the Impact Southern Company who for >years has had an uncollected judgment against you for $20,000. >You ripped off American Factors after you skipped town owing >them major money from your business collapse. You ripped off >Richard Simmons' concept of hand-weights for your failed "Fit- >Stiks" scheme. You defrauded investors in your "Aspen Diet" >financial scams. All of these people were convinced by your >lies to do your bidding to aid some scheme from which only you >could benefit or from which you were able to harm someone who >you perceived had slighted you. If you want to aid "justice," >just let your creditors know where you are. They'll exact >financial justice, if they think you even possess $3,000. Ho hum, what a mishmash of libel. You can do better than that, can't you? I'm waiting for the real evidence. > As to your sanity, nothing reflects your delusory state >of mind better than the time you "hand-delivered" a letter to >Church counsel in New York by jumping out of a waiting >elevator, flinging your letter towards the receptionist and >instantly disappearing again behind the closing elevator >doors. In it you voice your "realization" that the Church of >Scientology is "some type of intelligence agency project >itself, or a renegade think tank field experiment." You posit >that the mysterious goverment agency "periodically let[s] the >lower agencies publicly rough up Scientology to help maintain >the great religion cover." Somehow the phrase "pot calling the kettle black" sticks in my mind for unknown reasons. > Against this backdrop, you attempt to mislead net users >with false information about alleged attempts to serve process >on Mr. David Miscavige. As you and your attorneys know, Mr. >Miscavige does not live or work at the Church of Scientology >location where you claimed your process server tried to serve >him. Your attempts at service at that location were nothing >more than meaningless posturing and malicious harassment. You have not stated that the Miscavige subpoena does not exist. Mr. Farny, answer the question which is of interest to the Internet community -- does Mr. Wollersheim have a subpoena out for the honorable Mr. Miscavige? A failure to answer this question, or an attack on my integrity, is proof that there is a subpoena out for the honorable Mr. Miscavige, and that you fully know it. Now, if there is a subpoena, then why doesn't the honorable Mr. Miscavige do the brave and *right* thing and boldly go, with the fanfare of the press, and accept the subpoena? After all, if what you say is true that the honorable Mr. Miscavige is innocent of all these charges by Mr. Wollersheim, then he should have nothing to fear and the court will vindicate him and discredit Mr. Wollersheim. From the tone of your voice in your post, this is what you want. You have a golden opportunity to get what you want. > You also know that the process server did not even have a >lawful subpoena and that your attorney withdrew the bogus >subpoena when it was pointed out to him that the subpoena was >illegal and unenforceable. Indeed, your harassment of Mr. >Miscavige is simply unconscionable. Mr. Miscavige is not >connected with the Church of Scientology of California. He is >not an officer, director, managing agent or employee of that >organization and has nothing whatsoever to do with it. You >have never met Mr. Miscavige, never spoken to him and have >never corresponded with him in any way. So, get real! According to several legal affidavits which have been filed, this is an incorrect statement. According to them, the honorable Mr. Miscavige is the real leader of the Church of Scientology, all of its corporations, divisions, etc., and calls the shots just like a CEO of a major corporation. Your statement and the legally-filed affidavits under oath by former staff at CoS do not jive at all. What are we to believe when faced with such contradictory messages? > Imbedded in your defamatory remarks are the intentional >misstatements that the Church of Scientology of California and >Mr. Miscavige have something to hide with respect to the >Church's financial transactions. This is a complete >fabrication on your part. As you are well aware, all of the It's hard to prove either way. I guess it will get resolved in court. >Church's financial records have been made available for >scrutiny by the Internal Revenue Service, with every >transaction carefully dissected and projects such as MCCS >thoroughly examined. At the end of this extremely detailed >review, the IRS gave the Churches of Scientology a clean bill >of health -- no strange dealings, no improper transfers, no I wish I could comment on this as I have counter-information of interesting doings in Washington at the moment, but I'm under a promise not to reveal said information yet. So I guess we'll have to believe you here. But what does this have to do with anything? >inurement. The Church, as found by the IRS, is organized and >operated exclusively for religious and charitable purposes. >Anyone with a basic understanding of corporate and non-profit >corporate matters will therefore see that your allegation that >Mr. Miscavige seized control of the Church from the Hubbard >family is totally ludicrous. Your attempts to smear Mr. Your attempts to smear Mr. Wollersheim are incredible. Should I tell everybody that you wear army boots in bed, and cuddle up with your teddy bear? Of course not, as that is NOT true. But your attack of Wollersheim is the same thing. Utter nonsense -- not one shred of evidence, other than your word, is given. And should we believe your "Dead agenting" and not Mr. Wollersheim? After all, CoS refuses to work with the Internet to solve any difficulties they have with the *alleged* dissemination of CoS' copyright materials, which all started this in the first place. The attempted removal of a legitimate newsgroup in violation of Usenet standard practice and nettiquette by a CoS legal counsel does not help with your integrity in the eyes of the Internet community, nor with the community at large. Had you heeded the advice of many net.activists to work with EFF and the Internet community, things would not have gotten to this point on the Internet, and you would have a much better reputation. > You falsely claim that Mr. Miscavige is hiding. Indeed >the opposite is true. You are hiding so thoroughly that you >have to post these messages from a hidden box belonging to >someone else. As one of your many former attorneys explained, >you hide so thoroughly that even your counsel have had >difficulty contacting you directly. Instead, the attorney had >to place a call to an answering machine, which would then get >picked up by someone who would send a message to a beeper, With such vicious attacks on Mr. Wollersheim's character, I'd hide, too. Again, the best way to prove Mr. Wollersheim wrong is for the honorable Mr. Miscavige to bravely accept the subpoena so he could be vindicated of the charges and forever discredt Mr. Wollersheim. After all, you are right, aren't you? > It is also no surprise that you would accuse someone of >avoiding service of process, since that has been your own >established operating basis. Indeed, in one instance, you >were so intent to evade service of process that you threw your >car into reverse, backed up a hill and smashed into a >neighbor's car. Unsubstantiated claims of no importance to the issues at hand. > In short, your assertions relating to David Miscavige and >the Church of Scientology of California are false; your offer >of a "bounty" is unlawful and potentially criminal; your >solicitation of others to participate in this bounty is >potentially a violation of state and local laws; and, most >egregious, your claimed need for such assistance is phony from >start to finish: you never had a lawful subpoena and you have >no ability to acquire one. If he did something illegal, why don't you just go and sue him instead of throwing your words around here? By posting this stuff here, and not saying anything about taking him to court on this matter, is proof that you don't have a case and therefore what you say in this whole post is a lot of hot air. Take him to court and win on these points, and then we will be more likely to believe your charges. The Internet is not the place to conduct a trial or a witch-hunt. The average Internet/Usenet user is very intelligent, and very skeptical, and does not look kindly upon this tactic. It may work elsewhere, but not here. > I demand that you withdraw your scandalous offer and your >defamatory statements before people are forced to take legal >action against you. Then why don't you just take him to court over this post? It is obvious that Mr. Wollersheim strongly believes in what he is doing and will not retract the post in question. That's what you have attornies for, to sue, don't you? Or better yet, why don't you just cancel his message yourself? You've shown that you technically can do this. But remember that the Internet community does not take kindly to cancelling posts based on content. In summary, I am somewhat surprised by this post. From any honorable organization I would have expected cordiality and respect, and a better outlining of the Mr. Wollersheim's charges and why they are false. I do not see that in what you wrote above. I encourage you to rewrite it in an acceptable way, and then we will listen to you with more respect. You respect us, and we'll respect you. Simple, and it is what is taught in kindergarten. >Lynn R. Farny Have a great day. Jon Noring - -- OmniMedia | The Electronic Bookstore. Come in and browse! Two 1312 Carlton Place | locations: ftp.netcom.com /pub/Om/OmniMedia/books Livermore, CA 94550 | and ftp.awa.com /pub/softlock/pc/products/OmniMedia 510-294-8153 | E-book publishing service follows NWU recommendations. From: wbarwell@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (William Barwell) Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.censorship,alt.conspiracy,alt.current-events.net-abuse,alt.law-enforcement,alt.mindcontrol,alt.recovery.religion,alt.religion.christian,alt.society.mental-health,alt.support.ex-cult,comp.org.eff.talk,misc.legal,news.admin.misc,sci.psychology,talk.religion.misc Subject: Re: MESSAGE TO LARRY WOLLERSHEIM Date: 17 Feb 1995 10:42:29 -0600 In article , Kendrick Moxom wrote: >Dear Larry Wollersheim, > > I saw the February 13, 1995 notice you posted which >libels the Church of Scientology of California and Mr. David >Miscavige. Having been a director of Church of Scientology of >California and having testified in that capacity in your trial >in 1986, I know first hand that your posting is full of lies. You are an admitted official of the Church Of Scientology. It is far more likely to be that you are a liar than persons out side of your squallid Science Fiction cult. Further more, Wollersheim won. You evil clowns lost. Sounds like Larry's version has standing in teh courts and you do not. > > Your posting attempts to encourage others to join you in >a conspiracy to commit illegal acts by offering a "bounty" on >a person. Whhhhooooops! Wollersheim simply offered three thousand dollars to anyone who effectively came up with the where abouts of the cowardly David Miscavige who is running from the writ servers. Now let us aexamine this staement of yours further. 1. It is a brazen lie. You ARE a liar. just as I suspected you would be, as a Scientologist offical. 2. Laurence did not encourage anybody to commit illegal acts. This is THE lie you told that has just removed any and all credibilty you may have had here. 3. That statement is libellous. I hope Wollersheim sues YOU. It is a simple lie told with malicous intent. This is Scientology. I hope you have a good lawyer. I suspect you may need one shortly along with poodleboy. 4. Personally, my opinion of you is that you need a red hot poker heated up in hell jammed up your asshole. I have utter contempt for you. Your posting is false, defamatory and an obvious >extension of your usual pattern of attempting to bilk people >out of their work, their money, their time and their >integrity. I demand that you cease repetition of your lies >and your unlawful acts. > Wollersheim won his suit and apparently Davey had had the company stripped of assets. Wollersheim is simply using teh laws to pursue what is rightfully his. He did not defame nor lie, bilk anybody. Miscavige bilked him. When the papers finally get served, anmd they will, a court of law will see to it Wollersheim gets his money and the David's activities will be closely examined. That is all. You obvious lie about his reward for serving Miscavioge shows you are a shameless liar and once again, smear artist. I hope once again that you are sued for your libel. > Before innocent readers take to heart any of your >allegations it is important for them to know some basic facts >about your integrity, your lack of responsibility and your >sanity. > But we won't learn it from you. You have none either and showed it when you lied about Wollersheim 'conspiring' to commit illegal acts. A statment that shows you would not know the truth if I wrapped it around a baseball bat and hit you in the teeth with it. > Your lack of integrity is underscored by the manner in >which you chose to dodge the draft. The story is well-known >of your placing peanut butter in your underwear and running >down the halls of the draft board sampling the peanut butter >in order to fake your way out of military service. Thousands >of people at that time either served their country >responsibly, or were honest enough to state their views as >conscientious objectors. You chose a dishonest way out. > Oh bullshit. No army doctor would fall for THIS. This is an ancient and moldy joke from the 60's. Either you are the worst liar ever to sling a libel, or you are a subliterate moron. If you got this from Larry, you people are idiots not to get the joke. Ludicrous. > As to your lack of responsibility, I am amazed that you >would lure unsuspecting net users into joining you in your ********* slimy tripe deleted ********** Who cares lady. L. Ron Hubbard early in his craeer borrwoed money he never repayed. Didn't stop you from following him. Nor Ron's trail of deceits, money skimming ripping off early Dianetics partners and so on. And of course you have zero credibility with me becasue of you libel on Wollersheim on his 'conspiring' to commit illegal acts and targetting Davie the ruaway Poodleboy. Who is also a rip off artist and will soon be explaining this to a judge in court. Heat that #9 poker up again, won't you Satan? > > As to your sanity, nothing reflects your delusory state >of mind better than the time you "hand-delivered" a letter to >Church counsel in New York by jumping out of a waiting >elevator, flinging your letter towards the receptionist and >instantly disappearing again behind the closing elevator >doors. As if you are sane to libel somebody on the internet. Somebody who has just won a suit against your cult and shows every intention of pursuing this to the bitter end. In it you voice your "realization" that the Church of >Scientology is "some type of intelligence agency project >itself, or a renegade think tank field experiment." You posit >that the mysterious goverment agency "periodically let[s] the >lower agencies publicly rough up Scientology to help maintain >the great religion cover." > And you believe in Xenu, Clams, Volcanoes full of victims being atom bombed... Join Scientology. Become a loon > Against this backdrop, you attempt to mislead net users >with false information about alleged attempts to serve process >on Mr. David Miscavige. As you and your attorneys know, Mr. >Miscavige does not live or work at the Church of Scientology >location where you claimed your process server tried to serve >him. Your attempts at service at that location were nothing >more than meaningless posturing and malicious harassment. > Good. You know where he is, How would you like to earn $3000? Since David is such a law abiding citizen and all, I am sure you will tell Wollersheim his location and make sure Miscavige meets the servers at the door with a smile and a free copy of Dianetics. (Wirit servers are just working stiff doing a crummy but neccesary task.) Then he will go into court and simply clear this all up chop-chop as Wolersheim is obviously a frothing madman. OK. I challenge you to see this is all cleared up this week. Where is David now? > You also know that the process server did not even have a >lawful subpoena and that your attorney withdrew the bogus >subpoena when it was pointed out to him that the subpoena was >illegal and unenforceable. I do not believe you. Indeed, your harassment of Mr. >Miscavige is simply unconscionable. Mr. Miscavige is not >connected with the Church of Scientology of California. BWAHAHAHAHAHAH! You bet. We have all read the various declarations. He is >not an officer, director, managing agent or employee of that >organization and has nothing whatsoever to do with it. You >have never met Mr. Miscavige, never spoken to him and have >never corresponded with him in any way. So, get real! > I wonder if the courts will agree. > Imbedded in your defamatory remarks are the intentional >misstatements that the Church of Scientology of California and >Mr. Miscavige have something to hide with respect to the >Church's financial transactions. We will see. This is a complete >fabrication on your part. As you are well aware, all of the >Church's financial records have been made available for >scrutiny by the Internal Revenue Service, with every >transaction carefully dissected and projects such as MCCS >thoroughly examined. At the end of this extremely detailed >review, the IRS gave the Churches of Scientology a clean bill >of health -- no strange dealings, no improper transfers, no >inurement. The Church, as found by the IRS, is organized and >operated exclusively for religious and charitable purposes. How much money did Miscavige recieve last year from royalties from sales of books, tapes and other materials whose copyrights were held by various Scientology organization? >Anyone with a basic understanding of corporate and non-profit >corporate matters will therefore see that your allegation that >Mr. Miscavige seized control of the Church from the Hubbard >family is totally ludicrous. Your attempts to smear Mr. >Miscavige are as actionable as they are incredible. It wil be interesting to see in teh Spanish trial where the money being smuggled out of Spain was going, won't it? > > You falsely claim that Mr. Miscavige is hiding. Indeed >the opposite is true. Oh? Somehow I doubt your credibility here. You are hiding so thoroughly that you >have to post these messages from a hidden box belonging to >someone else. As one of your many former attorneys explained, >you hide so thoroughly that even your counsel have had >difficulty contacting you directly. Instead, the attorney had >to place a call to an answering machine, which would then get >picked up by someone who would send a message to a beeper, >after which you would call in to get a message. > As thoroughly as Hubbard hiding in the desert? Once again, if Miscavige is not hiding, where is he now. > It is also no surprise that you would accuse someone of >avoiding service of process, since that has been your own >established operating basis. Indeed, in one instance, you >were so intent to evade service of process that you threw your >car into reverse, backed up a hill and smashed into a >neighbor's car. > So if Wollershiem claims Davey is dodging service, he has expertise according to you. So he should know dodging when he sees it. > In short, your assertions relating to David Miscavige and >the Church of Scientology of California are false; your offer >of a "bounty" is unlawful and potentially criminal; BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! he merely offered $3000 ,dollars for info of Davies' whereabouts and no more. your >solicitation of others to participate in this bounty is >potentially a violation of state and local laws; and, most >egregious, your claimed need for such assistance is phony from >start to finish: you never had a lawful subpoena and you have >no ability to acquire one. > No bounty. This is libel. Information of his whereabouts. Get it right. Hope he sues you. > I demand that you withdraw your scandalous offer and your >defamatory statements before people are forced to take legal >action against you. > >Lynn R. Farny > > Ludicrous! Just Ludicrous! What is it about Scientology that makes 'em like this? Or is it that the undamaged ones get away. If you want to imagine the future, Image an E-meter stamping on a human brain - forever. Pope Charles SubGenius Pope Of Houston Slack! Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.censorship,alt.conspiracy,alt.current-events.net-abuse,alt.law-enforcement,alt.mindcontrol,alt.recovery.religion,alt.religion.christian,alt.society.mental-health,alt.support.ex-cult,comp.org.eff.talk,misc.legal,news.admin.misc,sci.psychology,talk.religion.misc From: msb@netcom.com (Mark S. Bilk) Subject: Scientology Solicits Criminal Acts? (was: MESSAGE TO LARRY WOLLERSHEIM Date: Sat, 18 Feb 1995 14:22:30 GMT In article , Kendrick Moxom (actually it was Lynn R. Farny) wrote: >Dear Larry Wollersheim, > > I saw the February 13, 1995 notice you posted which >libels the Church of Scientology of California and Mr. David >Miscavige. Having been a director of Church of Scientology of >California and having testified in that capacity in your trial >in 1986, I know first hand that your posting is full of lies. This refers to the following offer recently made by Larry Wollersheim: =In the last several weeks, private investigators and process =servers have twice tried to serve David Miscavige, Scientology's =absolute dictator, with a subpoena in the Wollersheim collection =case. Miscavige would not come out of the LA complex to accept =it. Instead, he sent his security people to intimidate the =process servers. ... =To further assist my process servers, I will give $3,000 to =any individual inside or outside of Scientology who gives us =Miscavige's location or changing locations if it results in =us successfully serving him. =HELP ME SERVE Miscavige. Get me any information that could =help our process servers and receive a $3,000 reward. Be a =part of the team that brings justice to Miscavige and Scientology. =Please copy and post this message anywhere it might assist us =in getting the information needed to catch Miscavige. Reply =via e-mail to lawrence@rmii.com or by U.S. Mail to 601 16th =St. #C-217, Golden, Colorado, 80401. Farny continues: > Your posting attempts to encourage others to join you in >a conspiracy to commit illegal acts by offering a "bounty" on >a person. Your posting is false, defamatory and an obvious >extension of your usual pattern of attempting to bilk people >out of their work, their money, their time and their >integrity. I demand that you cease repetition of your lies >and your unlawful acts. > In short, your assertions relating to David Miscavige and >the Church of Scientology of California are false; your offer >of a "bounty" is unlawful and potentially criminal; your >solicitation of others to participate in this bounty is >potentially a violation of state and local laws; Dear Ms. Farny, I wonder if you would help me out with some legal advice? Does the following posting "attempt to encourage others to join ... in a conspiracy to commit illegal acts by offering a `bounty' on a person" ? Is this "offer of a `bounty' ... unlawful and potentially criminal" ? Is this "solicitation of others to participate in this bounty ... potentially a violation of state and local laws" ? +Message-ID: <114306Z15011994@anon.penet.fi> +Newsgroups: alt.clearing.technology +From: an40286@anon.penet.fi +Date: Sat, 15 Jan 1994 11:35:06 UTC +Subject: $$$ REWARD $$$ + +-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= +REWARD*REWARD*REWARD*REWARD*REWARD*REWARD*REWARD*REWARD*REWARD*REWARD* +-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= + +The Religious Technology Center is the holder of the trade and service +marks of the Scientology religion. + +An award of $400.00 will be paid to any staff member or person in the +field who should hear of or be subjected to any provocative +antiorganization activity in the field and who then forwards sufficient +evidence of criminal background and connections of the provocative person +in such form that it can be given to the police by the Religious +Technology Center. + +Alertness if the penalty we pay for living in an aberrated society. + +Truth cannot live in an atmosphere of deceit. + + Religious Technology Center + 1710 Ivar Ave. + Suite 1100 + Los Angeles, CA 90028 + +-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= +REWARD*REWARD*REWARD*REWARD*REWARD*REWARD*REWARD*REWARD*REWARD*REWARD* +-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= From: milne@delphi.com Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Re: Where in the world is David Miscavige? ($3000 reward) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 95 01:55:45 -0500 February 27, 1995 MESSAGE TO LARRY WOLLERSHEIM: Dear Larry: I see you have reposted your second "bounty" notice, yet you have failed to respond to either of my responses to your first and second notices. The people you are trying to con into harassing the Church for a few bucks deserve to know the truth about your activities. You cannot claim to be too busy to answer up. Your telephone sales job is not that demanding and with Factnet off the net, you should have plenty of time on your hands. Your silence is your biggest indictment. Lynn Farny ============================================================= February 14, 1995 MESSAGE TO LARRY WOLLERSHEIM: Dear Larry Wollersheim, I saw the February 13, 1995 notice you posted which libels the Church of Scientology of California and Mr. David Miscavige. Having been a director of Church of Scientology of California and having testified in that capacity in your trial in 1986, I know first hand that your posting is full of lies. Your posting attempts to encourage others to join you in a conspiracy to commit illegal acts by offering a "bounty" on a person. Your posting is false, defamatory and an obvious extension of your usual pattern of attempting to bilk people out of their work, their money, their time and their integrity. I demand that you cease repetition of your lies and your unlawful acts. Before innocent readers take to heart any of your allegations it is important for them to know some basic facts about your integrity, your lack of responsibility and your sanity. Your lack of integrity is underscored by the manner in which you chose to dodge the draft. The story is well-known of your placing peanut butter in your underwear and running down the halls of the draft board sampling the peanut butter in order to fake your way out of military service. Thousands of people at that time either served their country responsibly, or were honest enough to state their views as conscientious objectors. You chose a dishonest way out. As to your lack of responsibility, I am amazed that you would lure unsuspecting net users into joining you in your culpability with a promise to pay them money. If you are advertising that you will pay someone for their services, you should first disclose to them the trail of creditors you have left from LA to Aspen -- the list of people you ripped off which goes on and on -- and who you have assiduously sought to avoid. You ripped off the Impact Southern Company who for years has had an uncollected judgment against you for $20,000. You ripped off American Factors after you skipped town owing them major money from your business collapse. You ripped off Richard Simmons' concept of hand-weights for your failed "Fit- Stiks" scheme. You defrauded investors in your "Aspen Diet" financial scams. All of these people were convinced by your lies to do your bidding to aid some scheme from which only you could benefit or from which you were able to harm someone who you perceived had slighted you. If you want to aid "justice," just let your creditors know where you are. They'll exact financial justice, if they think you even possess $3,000. As to your sanity, nothing reflects your delusory state of mind better than the time you "hand-delivered" a letter to Church counsel in New York by jumping out of a waiting elevator, flinging your letter towards the receptionist and instantly disappearing again behind the closing elevator doors. In it you voice your "realization" that the Church of Scientology is "some type of intelligence agency project itself, or a renegade think tank field experiment." You posit that the mysterious goverment agency "periodically let[s] the lower agencies publicly rough up Scientology to help maintain the great religion cover." Against this backdrop, you attempt to mislead net users with false information about alleged attempts to serve process on Mr. David Miscavige. As you and your attorneys know, Mr. Miscavige does not live or work at the Church of Scientology location where you claimed your process server tried to serve him. Your attempts at service at that location were nothing more than meaningless posturing and malicious harassment. You also know that the process server did not even have a lawful subpoena and that your attorney withdrew the bogus subpoena when it was pointed out to him that the subpoena was illegal and unenforceable. Indeed, your harassment of Mr. Miscavige is simply unconscionable. Mr. Miscavige is not connected with the Church of Scientology of California. He is not an officer, director, managing agent or employee of that organization and has nothing whatsoever to do with it. You have never met Mr. Miscavige, never spoken to him and have never corresponded with him in any way. So, get real! Imbedded in your defamatory remarks are the intentional misstatements that the Church of Scientology of California and Mr. Miscavige have something to hide with respect to the Church's financial transactions. This is a complete fabrication on your part. As you are well aware, all of the Church's financial records have been made available for scrutiny by the Internal Revenue Service, with every transaction carefully dissected and projects such as MCCS thoroughly examined. At the end of this extremely detailed review, the IRS gave the Churches of Scientology a clean bill of health -- no strange dealings, no improper transfers, no inurement. The Church, as found by the IRS, is organized and operated exclusively for religious and charitable purposes. Anyone with a basic understanding of corporate and non-profit corporate matters will therefore see that your allegation that Mr. Miscavige seized control of the Church from the Hubbard family is totally ludicrous. Your attempts to smear Mr. Miscavige are as actionable as they are incredible. You falsely claim that Mr. Miscavige is hiding. Indeed the opposite is true. You are hiding so thoroughly that you have to post these messages from a hidden box belonging to someone else. As one of your many former attorneys explained, you hide so thoroughly that even your counsel have had difficulty contacting you directly. Instead, the attorney had to place a call to an answering machine, which would then get picked up by someone who would send a message to a beeper, after which you would call in to get a message. It is also no surprise that you would accuse someone of avoiding service of process, since that has been your own established operating basis. Indeed, in one instance, you were so intent to evade service of process that you threw your car into reverse, backed up a hill and smashed into a neighbor's car. In short, your assertions relating to David Miscavige and the Church of Scientology of California are false; your offer of a "bounty" is unlawful and potentially criminal; your solicitation of others to participate in this bounty is potentially a violation of state and local laws; and, most egregious, your claimed need for such assistance is phony from start to finish: you never had a lawful subpoena and you have no ability to acquire one. I demand that you withdraw your scandalous offer and your defamatory statements before people are forced to take legal action against you. Lynn R. Farny =============================================== 22 February 1995 Dear Larry, I see you have posted a second notice offering an unlawful "bounty" for service of process. You never responded to my posting concerning your first letter about this "bounty." My answer was posted to a.r.s because I felt it was necessary to communicate the truth about the lies you posted in a public forum and to warn others of your multiple layers of deception. I also did it to give you an opportunity to publicly stand up to someone from the Church. Frankly, I was somewhat surprised at your silence, as I expected at least somewhat of a retort. After all, I have been around you and your allegations for thirteen years and have the benefit of that experience in recalling for your readers things you have chosen to misrepresent. That you would not even respond tells me my remarks were right on target and that I should continue communicating them. Take, for example, your fanciful notion that something nefarious happened to the assets of Church of Scientology of California. You make all manner of wild allegations in your two most recent postings about what happened to the assets of the Church of Scientology of California. You have neglected to tell your readers that I sat on the witness stand during your trial, looked you right in the eye and told you under oath the exact organizational structure of the Church of Scientology of California at that time, the changes that had taken place in that structure and the financial condition of the California Church. Your lawyer had the opportunity to ask me any question he wanted. The Court of Appeals accepted my testimony and considered it conclusive on the subject of the financial condition of the California Church, when they denounced the original verdict as "excessive" and "preposterous." Further, the Internal Revenue Service thoroughly examined and rejected every one of your allegations with respect to the finances of the Church and found no irregularities whatsoever. As to your claim in your most recent posting that Mr. David Miscavige was served with a deposition subpoena in the Church of Scientology International v. Fishman and Geertz case, that, too is complete fiction. Mr. Miscavige was never served with anything in that case, much less being served with a subpoena at a Christmas party. Again, I was there; you were not. As to the "crack" process servers you allegedly have roaming the world to serve subpoenas, one of those "crack" process servers -- actually one of your "crack" lawyers -- tagged me with a subpoena last week at court. The subpoena was so improper and defective that your lawyer was forced to withdraw it under threat of more serious penalties. If this is an example of your "crack" team, you should save yourself the trouble -- and not bother with any more of them. Larry, in all the years that I have been dealing with you and your false allegations, never once have you agreed to sit down and attempt to resolve differences with communication. You hide behind a vast array of answering machines and post office boxes and never come out of the weeds long enough to accomplish anything. We in the Church, on the other hand, are out and about in the world expanding our religion. Who's hiding from whom here? The war is over, Larry. Scientology won. We have expanded more in the last decade than ever before. We are all over the world with millions and millions of members. You could no more "bring down" Scientology than you could bring down the Rocky Mountains. So why try? Come out from the weeds, Larry, deal directly with us and matters can be resolved. Lynn Farny From: Bob Penny Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: 3-7-95 update to WHERE IN THE WORLD IS DAVID MISCAVIGE? Date: Wed, 8 Mar 95 00:19:13 -0500 3-7-95 UPDATE TO "WHERE IN THE WORLD IS DAVID MISCAVIGE?" March 7, 1995, 8:30 p.m. Within 24 hours the Wollersheim legal team will send Scientology a powerful signal of our seriousness about demonstrating that Scientology is not above the law. We are determined to serve David Miscavige with process papers, assign him personal responsibility, and get him into court. If you do not hear about our legal action in the international media within 48 hours, I will post another update to let everyone know what was done. I believe that within a few more days the probability that David Miscavige will be served is very very high. If he shows his face at any type of Scientology or non-Scientology event, he will be served by our hired process servers, a former Scientologist, a current Scientologist who has already made up his mind to leave, or he will be given up by his many enemies within Scientology who want either to remove a liability to the organization or to restore the Hubbard family. If he security checks everyone around him, everyone going to any event, and changes everything he has scheduled for the next 4-6 days he might avoid our process servers, but only temporarily. The next 24 hours should convince you, David, that there is no place to hide. Stop embarrasing youself in front of your juniors and embarassing Scientology with your cowardice. Give yourself up for service and take the heat for your organization, just like you ordered Mary Sue Hubbard to do when you told her and the other GO people to surrender and go to jail. Lawrence Wollersheim P.S. Please continue sending your faxes and e-mails. Although I can't personally acknowledge them all, they are going to the proper people and I will pay three $3,000 dollar rewards for the best information leading to legal service. "WHERE IN THE WORLD IS DAVID MISCAVIGE?" From: Bob Penny Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: 3-8-95 update to "WHERE IN THE WORLD IS DAVID MISCAVIGE?" Date: Thu, 9 Mar 95 01:49:34 -0500 3-8-95 UPDATE OF "WHERE IN THE WORLD IS DAVID MISCAVIGE" March 8, 1995, 8:30 p.m. I said yesterday that within 24 hours of my last update, the Wollersheim legal team would send Scientology a powerful signal of our seriousness about demonstrating that Scientology is not above the law. I also said that I would post another update letting everyone know what was done. This is that posting. Today (Wednesday, March 8, 1995) the Los Angeles County Sheriff went to the "church" of Scientology of California's LA headquarters to install a Keeper. A Keeper is a public individual who acts as an agent of the court. He or she goes onto the premises and establishes an inventory of all assets, in anticipation of a Receiver. The Receiver actually takes possession of all assets and controls them until the court figures out how to use them to pay off the debts of the debtor organization. The sheriff was delayed until a Scientology attorney produced documents showing the "church" headquarters and offices had been abruptly transferred to the law offices of Bowles and Moxon (a Scientology OSA front acting like a law firm). SCIENTOLOGY IS NOW RUNNING THEIR MOTHER CHURCH FROM A LAW OFFICE STAFFED BY INTELLIGENCE OPERATIVES OF THE OSA. The "church" of Scientology has been forced step by step toward receivership by the Wollersheim legal team for its failure and claimed inability to pay its debts. Consider the public relations contradiction they have created for themselves. On the one hand, you have a known Satanic and neo-Nazi "church" with duped celebrities and politicians among its claimed 50,000 active members, that claims to be growing by leaps and bounds and to be a successful worldwide economic powerhouse. On the other hand it says in court that it can't pay its debts. The LA County sheriff has to be brought in to help enforce a collection process approved by the U.S. Supreme Court. What a public joke Scientology and its inept leadership has made of itself, of its credibility, growth, influence, and plans. Now we have all seen that Scientology is so poorly run and/or unsuccessful that it can't pay its bills, that it puts itself above the law, and that its largest and most famous mother church is being run out of a law office. It makes you wonder about the solvency of all the other Scientology organizations. The LA County sheriff beginning to enforce the steps of the liquidation of Scientology's assets shows the world just what a bogus and schizophrenic organization Scientology really is. Scientology inability to pay its current debts shows the world that Scientology is a shrinking failure and just how far it has fallen under the leadership of the hiding coward David Miscavige. The sheriff s arrival on Scientology's doorstep also confirms the steady and relentless push of the Wollersheim legal team to use the full extent of the law to execute the Wollersheim judgment and blaze a legal path for future victim defense and recovery. And guess what, David Miscavige, your being personally served with process papers is as inevitable as the LA county sheriff returning to Scientology's offices in the very near future. Lawrence Wollersheim P.S. Please continue sending your faxes (1-303-530-2950) and e-mail (lawrence@rmii.com). Although I can't personally acknowledge all messages and help that I have received, I can assure you everything is going to the proper people and that I will pay three $3,000 rewards ($9,000 total) for the best information assistance I get on "WHERE IN THE WORLD IS DAVID MISCAVIGE." From: Bob Penny Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Where In The World Is David Miscavige (4/12/95) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 95 23:02:17 -0500 "WHERE IN THE WORLD IS DAVID MISCAVIGE" 4/12/95 April 12, 1995 In my last update on my and other individuals' efforts to serve process on David Miscavige, I mentioned a legal technicality that was delaying our efforts. We remain determined that he WILL take the witness stand and have an opportunity to explain where $500 million of Scientology assets went when he had control over the "church" of Scientology of California. This update will explain the delay and where we are now. I must first take the deposition of the current head of the deliberately broke "church" of Scientology of California, Niel Levin. According to OSA and GO defectors, Niel Levin is a recently appointed figurehead whose only role is to know almost nothing about the earlier finances and asset transactions or asset locations of the "church" of Scientology of California. Scientology's purpose in putting a recently appointed figurehead in this position is so that when he gets on the witness stand, he can "honestly" state that he knows nothing about that question. We have anticipated this scam and are prepared for it. In fact, Wollersheim has been preparing for this and other Scientology collection scams for the last 15 years. My first attorney, Charles O'Reilly, who won the original Wollersheim case, told me at the very beginning of the case that winning the case was only a small part of our work. Preparing for collection, and Scientology's anticipated asset scam, was something we had to begin preparing a defense for from the very beginning of the case. During all these years, our various legal teams have been setting a trap. We knew that Scientology, in its arrogance, was going to strip the assets to try and burn not just Wollersheim but all other victims' collection efforts. For 15 years we have been debriefing former high level members knowledgeable about those asset transfers. For 15 years we have been accumulating bits and pieces of the paper trail that will document fraudulent conveyance of assets and lead to enforcement of our collection to the full extent and penalties of the law. Scientology could not have given us a better present than doing the predictable and placing itself above the law. Now, through the relentless pursuit of my collection attorneys and the criminal fraud charges that will most likely come out of it, Scientology has provided ALL VICTIMS with a greater opportunity to win far more than just the Wollersheim case. The impending collapse of Scientology's hastily constructed corporate structure (constructed with the purpose and goal of "not one thin dime for Wollersheim") will facilitate legal and just collection by all other victims. Here is how Niel Levin's upcoming May 15 deposition is going to help that process. Niel Levin will give basically three types of answers to the thousands of asset transfer questions he will be asked. One: "I don't know." Two: partial and deliberately incomplete answers. Three: false and misleading answers. Other than answering his name correctly, we expect that almost all of Levin's answers will fall into the above three categories. It is not so much what Levin will say but what he will NOT say or will FALSELY say that will be his undoing. Using Levin's "answers" we will set up our next legal action(s) which will be one or more of the following three actions. It might be all or several at the same time. One. While continuing to try to serve Miscavige personally, we will move to get the judge to order Miscavige to appear as the true managing agent of Scientology -- as was done in the Fishman-Geertz case with such success that he dropped the case and went back into hiding. But he can't drop this one. Two. We will re-ask the bankruptcy judge who INVITED US BACK TO COURT after our first receivership motion, to now authorize that a receiver be appointed over the "church" of Scientology of California. Three. We will initiate a new motion to amend the Wollersheim judgment to include all new Scientology corporations which we assert were the device by which Miscavige hid the assets of the former "mother church." Niel Levin and Scientology's "brilliant" legal strategists are in a complete no win situation that is going to be sending a lot of people to the RPF for putting the whole organization at risk with such a doomed legal position. There will be some other surprises for Niel but I can't mention those here except indirectly by asking for your help if anyone out on the Internet has any of the following information about Mr. Levin. 1. Do you have any knowledge about Niel Levin's Scientology history that may be of interest to our lawyers? 2. Do you have any knowledge about Niel Levin's personal or business history that may be of interest to our lawyers? Don't think the Levin deposition delay has taken any personal process server off of Miscavige. Until Miscavige is served, our team and other legal teams wanting to serve him personally in other Scientology cases, will be relentless and will utilize every bit of information that comes to us on Miscavige's current whereabouts or travel plans. Until he is served, he still won't be able to step out of the bedroom of where he is hiding without wondering "are the process servers here today to serve me" or wondering if today is the day someone in the organization will give him up. Twenty four hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year the Wollersheim case (and now process servers from other cases) will be a continual presence in Miscavige's mind, plans, and daily life. In closing, count on a steady and relentless push to use the fullest extent of the law to execute the Wollersheim judgment. Count on our commitment to every step of the legal process in serving Miscavige and collecting "every thin dime" that the court awarded to me. Our team has taken Scientology through every court in the U.S. for the last 15 years in three different Wollersheim cases and we have NEVER lost! Resolutely yours, Lawrence Wollersheim P.S. Please continue sending your faxes (to 1-303-530-2950) and e-mail (to "lawrence@factnet.org"). Although I can't personally acknowledge all messages, all messages are being properly recorded, credited, and forwarded where appropriate. Remember that I will pay three $3,000 rewards ($9,000 total) for the best information assistance I get in answer to my "WHERE IN THE WORLD IS DAVID MISCAVIGE" postings. - -- Xenu's Famous House o' Clams T-shirts! *All* profits go to MoFo to help with the Dennis Erlich Defense Fund. Email to: ladyada@gnu.ai.mit.edu for details $15 per shirt, 3 colors. Design available at http://www.cybercom.net/~rnewman/scientology/home.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.i iQBVAgUBMEzxHHZ/m2/Pgo35AQGHmwIAlPVTh76d7/5I6vOUqaX+/BNTMcsxjHe2 9Tq7E8zrO0AXT9WeNGl2Z/eWSJ+HeKzeDihdglatGw1Vk2/ckPlEIQ== =Ge5y -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----