This is intended to raise questions, not to side track, misinform, or discredit anyone. The sole purpose of this piece of speculative opinion, is to raise pertinent questions, that effect us all. I know I'll get negative feedback from quite a few people on this list. I personally think it's something that needs to be considered, and that's all it is intended for.
I want to share an insight with all on this list. It's based on speculation, but will be hard to refute. The issue of compartmentalized, suppressed, or traumatic memory recall, is in my opinion, disinformation. My reasons are that unless therapy to re-call these memories, are not done in a 100 percent shielded area, that electromagnetic weapons cannot permeate, then they should be greeted with skepticism. Why would these 'memories', that haven't been consistently apparent, be allowed in a court of law, to prosecute individuals? The psychiatry profession inadvertently has been coerced, as a tool for the perpetrators of electromagnetic weapons. Many disorders have come about in recent times, and did the methods of psychiatry improve? People do things, and we wonder why, so the psychiatric community as we all do, look for common variables, to create patterns, to try to explain why. If there is electromagnetic weapons technology in existence, this could be the obvious common factor to most psychiatric disorders. There is enough technological evidence to support strong speculation, that electromagnetic weapons could be causing a wide range of perceived mental illness.

In reference to the 60 minutes show being aired Sunday night, brain fingerprinting, I haven't seen the show yet, but it is feasible to have some questions arise. The possibility of "psychic phenomenon" would and could be a measure of guilt, according to that technology. Think of suppressed memory re-call and the acceptance of this therapy from the psychiatric community, as well as the existence of electromagnetic weapons technology, could be devastating to our justice system. It would be the perfect persecution tool, all the "perps" would have to do, is plant certain information of the case to you, and make sure you get called to be examined by this technology. Is that paranoid to think that way, or realistic? Tested to 100 percent accuracy on FBI agents, and studies done for the CIA and the NAVY. I ask all of you this question: knowing of the possibilty (Victims know positively), of electromagnetic weapons, who do you think of? I come up with these answers:

CIA/NSA/NAVY/maybe FBI. Seems quite strange. How could technology like this, be accepted for prosecution of people in the future? If the psychiatric community openly accepts the therapeutic practice of re-calling memories, than is it not accepted by "experts"? Would the "experts" then support and back 'brain fingerprinting' technology for use in prosecutions? If it were to be accepted by experts, would it ease public opposition, to the use of this technology?

There was quite a surge of memory re-call therapy in the late 80's early 90's, can anyone explain why? Was there any new pioneering method developed, that was 100 percent assured that electromagnetic weapons wouldn't be able to influence?

When I look at certain people that have written books, based on accounts of suppressed, compartmentalized, or traumatic memory re-call, their accounts seem unbelievable. I am not able to say those memories they've re-called are false, but cannot say they are true either, could they? Were those memories re-called in a 100 percent shielded area, in which no electromagnetic weapons could permeate? Most of the people named in these books, are famous well known people, that we all have in our memories, if a person doubts their own memory, is convinced that suppressed memories exist, it would be a lot easier to manipulate and create re-called memories. They may be true, but also may not...who can say? I personally think, inadvertently that some people are advertising 'memory re-call therapy', for the perpetrators, and don't even know it. The non Internet public is what's going to see those accounts first, before they see anything else on mind control, and that is how they will be influenced to think, about the mind control topic. It will seem unbelievable to most, and from that point on people will have a preconceived notion about mind control, that is what most of the general public will think, when they think of mind control.

On a bright side, if governmental agencies try to use 'brain fingerprinting' to prosecute individuals, all proponents of civil liberties and privacy along with the ACLU and similar groups will oppose this issue. This will move to the public platform, and draw attention to electromagnetic weapons, and all other privacy encroaching technology.

THIS HAS BEEN COMPLETE SPECULATION, I DO NOT INTEND TO DISCREDIT ANY INDIVIDUAL'S ACCOUNTS. MY INTENT WAS TO BRING UP A FRESH SET OF QUESTIONS/IDEAS TO THE GROUP AND INDIVIDUALS ON THE LIST. I APOLOGIZE FOR ALL I MIGHT OFFEND, THIS WAS NOT MY INTENT.

"together we stand, divided we fall"

60 minutes program airing this Sunday; pertaining to the use of 'Brain Fingerprinting' to try to overturn a murder conviction. However will this technology be used in the future for prosecution? The implications of undo influence of electromagnetic weapons upon this 'new' technology is startling.

How much does the influence of electromagnetic weapons technology have on lie detector tests? The truth may be traumatic to all americans.

Go Back