In article <3ac9e6d7.0@news2.lightlink.com>, Theta One <thetaone@icehouse.net> writes >"Nelson" <nelsonjr@powersurfr.com> wrote in message
>news:3ac9d36d.0@news2.lightlink.com...
>> I think it was in PDC 20 (one version of it, the newest, was editied out
>> to omit this) ,,,,but LRH said Scientology could make Orwell's 1984
>> look real pale if the solution of scientology was ever lost sight of by man
>> at large but yet the technology was in use but out of sight.
>Hi Nelson;
>
>Here is part of what was deleted from PDC 20:
>
>"Did you ever read poor old George Orwell's 1984? Yes, yes, that's
>wonderful. That would be--------could be the palest imagined shadow
>of what a world would be like under the rule of the secret use of
>Scientology with no remedy in existence."
Hubbard really had no sense of self-awareness, did he? Take the following:

"These subjects have been lucky enough not to get into such financial straits that they could not extricate themselves from ownership and control of persons who would have utilized them to the detriment of Man. Dianetics and Scientology have not depended upon large donations from personally interested persons... Although various materials of Dianetics and Scientology have occasionally been tendered to official and private agencies, any effort on the part of these to monopolize or to classify under security headings this data, would not only have been resisted, it would have been defeated. Because Dianetics and Scientology and the existing organizations have been financed in this fashion, Dianetics and Scientology are free, and will not be used in the direction of some George Orwellian nightmare." - Hubbard, "Ownership", Professional Auditor's Bulletin no. 53 of 27 May 1955

Go Back