-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In article<3c029ceb.6177279@news.ezwv.com>, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com> writes:

>"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORG> wrote:
>>Caroline Letkeman wrote:
>>> OSA Agent. When I started walking across the street to get a better
>>> shot, he quickly left the scene, moving west on Hastings.
>>I wonder if these people think they're intimidating when they
>>take photographs of activists and then and hide when an
>>activist tries to walk over and photograph them and talk
>>with them. Boy, they sure are scary. }:-}
>That photo of Dave Bird having his feet photographed in a British
>(London?) picket was the all-time classic.
Yes, they took note where blood had run down from a leg ulcer;

then used the information to have some cunt kick me where they estimated the leg ulcer to be, while I was not carrying any painkillers. What a fine and noble religion we are dealing with.

In article<MPG.166ee3184a4f1c7989774@news2.lightlink.com>, Zinj <zinjifar@yahoo.com> writes:

>> > One reason might be intimidation. Another one could be something else
>> > entirely. And if it is only intimidation then they might not be trying to
>> > intimidate the present picketers but those to come.
>> I don't think it's an attempt to intimidate because they must
>> know that it doesn't work.
>Ahh! Here's your misunderstood word. Of *course* it's an attempt at
>intimidation, but trying to judge Scientology by 'sane' perspectives of
>'it obviously doesn't work, so they would stop' runs afoul of Hubbardian
>dogma that *tells* them that 'shuddering into silence' always works;
You misunderstand: it has succeeded in intimidating those who do not attend pickets because they are intimidated, And I have had several people refuse to attend all, or attend particular, pickets because they fear their wives and children will be attacked or at least harassed at their home addresses.

Go Back