In English:
When the judgment of Madrid began, it did it with arguments of the defense that were directed to obtain the cancellation of the process. Then the judge decided to study all the requests of cancellation that were eight on the part of the defense and one on the part of the accusation. The request of the accusation was due to the appearance of Heber Jentzsch and did not ask for the suspension of the judgment. The arguments of the defense were those of always; the methods to obtain tests, also the nonappearance of Jentzsch, the years passed from the supposed crime, etc. Then the judgment was postponed until February since the judge wanted to study requests and to decide about them. But the judgment became to postpone since the judge had another case and was occupied with another judgment that included jury and who could not leave. In addition the date to March underwent another postponement and the Vista started again the five of April. That day reading to the answer of the Judge occurred to cancellation requests. Of the decided thing by the judge I do not have not�cias since the press has not spoken of it but juici� has not been annulled and it announced that it would continue the today, 17 of April.

And today it has not followed but either what has happened. I will try to inquire into everything what can and postear� my inquiries in this group as soon as has them. Greetings.

end
Feisty

Another translation (cleaned-up babblefish) pasted by Arnie.

When the judgment in Madrid began, it started with arguments by the defense that were directed toward obtaining cancellation of the process {translator's note - this term is probably a legal one in Spain that means more than the literal translation I've provided}. And so then the judge decided to study all the requests of cancellation that were "part eight" of the defense and "part one" of the accusation {prosecution team may be called "accusatory team" there?}. The request from the accusation (prosecution?) was due to the appearance of Heber Jentzsch who did not ask for a suspension of the judgment. The arguments the defense team made were the same as they always bring up: the methods to obtain tests, the non-appearance of Jentzsch, many years have passed since the supposed crime, etc. The judgment was previously postponed until February (of this year) because the judge needed time to study the requests and to decide about them. But the judgment since became postponed again because the judge became involved with working on another case and involving another judgment which included a jury who could not leave until they came to their decision. In addition the date for March underwent another postponement and it started again. On the 5th of April, according to his response/answer, the Judge received requests for cancellation of the process.

Regarding judge's decision, I don't have any news because the press has not mentioned it but the case {trial ??? something - sorry} has not been annulled and there WAS an annoucement that it would continue the today, 17 of April.
-- ptsc

> Cuando el juicio de Madrid empez�, lo hizo con argumentos de la defensa que
> estaban dirigidos a conseguir la anulaci�n del proceso. Entonces la juez
> decidi� estudiar todas la solicitudes de anulaci�n que eran unas ocho por
> parte de la defensa y una por parte de la acusaci�n. La solicitud de la
> acusaci�n era debido a la no comparecencia de Heber Jentzsch y solicitaba la
> suspensi�n del juicio. Los argumentos de la defensa eran los de siempre; los
> m�todos de lograr pruebas, tambi�n la no comparecencia de Jentzsch, los a�os
> transcurridos desde el supuesto delito, etc.
>
> Entonces el juicio se aplaz� hasta febrero ya que la juez quer�a estudiar
> las peticiones y decidir acerca de ellas. Pero el juicio se volvi� a aplazar
> ya que la juez tuvo otro caso y estaba ocupada con otro juicio que inclu�a
> jurado y que no pod�a dejar. Adem�s la fecha de marzo sufri� otro
> aplazamiento y la vista se reanud� el cinco de abril. Ese d�a se dio lectura
> a la respuesta de la Juez a las peticiones de anulaci�n. De lo decidido por
> la juez no tengo not�cias ya que la prensa no ha hablado de ello pero el
> juici� no se ha anulado y se anunci� que continuar�a el hoy, 17 de abril. Y
> hoy ha seguido pero tampoco se qu� ha sucedido.
>
> Intentar� informarme de todo lo que pueda y postear� mis averiguaciones en
> este grupo tan pronto como las tenga.
>
> Saludos.

Go Back