On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, Fredric L. Rice wrote:

> Joe's Garage <swatron@xenu.net> wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, German_Scn_News wrote:
>
> >For any of the new faces who are unfamiliar with Scientology's desert
> >training, here is a url of the testimony from one of the guys who helped
> >set it up, Andre Tabayoyon: http://www.lermanet.com/cos/andre.html
>
> Mr. T doesn't mention rocket launchers, does he? I read the texts
> some time ago but don't recall anything about any damn rocket launchers.
The above url was given in case anybody was interested in getting some background on one of Scientology's fortified desert installations and Marine-like detachments.

> At Gilman, the need to close the roads would be the crook's more
> prioritized activities in the event they learn that the Feds wish
> to conduct a no-knock warrant on their compound. There are few
> enough roads that could be controlled long enough for the crooks
> to get every piece of paper shredded.
You're assuming the FBI will drive up in their Chevys and Buicks. I'm assuming Scientology has a maze of tunnels which can be quickly barricaded. My assumption is based on the name of the place, "Gold," and that anything of value will not be kept above ground.

If you want to get into tunnels, you either have to sneak up past the dogs, guards and motion detectors or take the place by storm. That means APCs and helicopters. Defense in that case consists of rockets. I don't see what the big deal is. You can get projectiles of all sorts around any military installation, and it's not like Scientology is the only cult out there. The presence or absence of roads is not a decisive factor in either case.

Joe C., escaped Scientology white slave turned pro-critic Rambo "If you think the problem with Scientology is bad now, just wait until we find out what it is."

http://members.tripod.com/cic_ops/counter_warfare

>> At Gilman, the need to close the roads would be the crook's more
>> prioritized activities in the event they learn that the Feds wish
>> to conduct a no-knock warrant on their compound. There are few
>> enough roads that could be controlled long enough for the crooks
>> to get every piece of paper shredded.
>The documents detailing their criminal activities are stored in a bank
>vault in Clearwater, Florida. This is thought by them to be "raid
>proof," since a FBI raid will not open the vault without a great deal of
>effort, and by the time the FBI gets the courts to issue a subpoena for
>the vault's keys / lock combinations, the crime syndicate will have
>mobilized a legal defense to stop the subpoena. Even after the raid, it
>may take ten years to get the vault open. The solution is to have the
>FBI prepared to open the vault while the raid is going on.
The idea that something is explosion-RESISTANT (nothing is 100% PROOF) is somewhat hollow. Yes, 2ft of rock door at some distance from the explosion may stand a lot of pressure. When you can walk up and place large v-notched charge along either side it, it don't resist for long.

> You're assuming the FBI will drive up in their Chevys and Buicks.
> I'm assuming Scientology has a maze of tunnels which can be quickly
> barricaded. My assumption is based on the name of the place, "Gold," and
> that anything of value will not be kept above ground.
> If you want to get into tunnels, you either have to sneak up past the
> dogs, guards and motion detectors or take the place by storm. That means
> APCs and helicopters. Defense in that case consists of rockets. I don't
> see what the big deal is. You can get projectiles of all sorts around any
> military installation, and it's not like Scientology is the only cult out
> there. The presence or absence of roads is not a decisive factor in either
> case.
Thing is, this will never happen.

Never, ever, ever, ever, ever.

The government is ~not~, repeat, ~not~ going to do a thing about Co$.

If you think they will, you are only suffering from wishful thinking.

It just simply is ~not~ going to happen.

Co$ will keep on, as it has, not only ~un~impeded by the goverment, but ~helped~ by it.

It will just be lots of slow picking and chiping by a few ex-members and critics that have the stamina to let the public know the truth.

Again, I hate to burst anybody's bubble, but there is no way the government will step in to this, not a chance.

ARC, Beverly

>Minton Said, "If one were to back them into a corner one day, they would resort
>to violence. They possess rocket launchers, bazookas, countless other
>weapons."
>
>Source: http://cisar.org/000407a.htm
Dinky Colorado militia groups are reputed to RPGs and mortars.

Several weapons seizures were made on I-25 just north of metro Denver and reported in the papers.

Then there's the kiddie chapters of the drug gangs. They were getting busted with "street sweepers" and machine pistols, way before they started showing up in the Movies.

Given the Crime Syndicate of $cientology's vastly larger war chest and their association with international weapons merchants, it wouldn't surprise me if they some of the heavier armaments, including shoulder fired SAMs and some anti-tank weapons. I doubt they could come to grips with the larger stuff, SCUDs and the like. That's way beyond the 1950's culture found inside the $cientology crime cult. They hate people and things enough to want the advanced weapons, but they're not smart or disciplined enough to use 'em.

BTW, why haven't any of the OSA posters denied these allegations about weapons of mass destruction? Or, are you the Crime Syndicate's official denier?

-- Ted (ted@ibexbsc.com)

Go Back