AMPaquette@aol.com wrote:

> Dear Mr. Rashleigh-Berry:
>
> Your last communication to me about the above matter was that you
> rejected proof that my client owns the photograph that you currently
> have on your web page on the Internet, instead insisting that the
> "original" be mailed to you. It is clear to me, as it would be to any
> Court, that you are simply playing games here.
I resent your comments about my intentions and you should make note of that. I require the original because it is very easy to fake the argued image in a fax to me. The photograph can be overlayed on the document and then faxed which would enforce your claim falsely. Also the quality of a fax image would not allow me to make a judgement in any case.

> You have a long, documented history of infringing upon our
> clients' copyrights.
You would be required to prove this which, of course, you would not be able to do.

> Your insistence on receiving an original copy of the photograph is
> evident
> bad faith,
I explained my reasons to you initially and do the same now with further clarification. I would point out that another dishonest lawyer employed by your law firm - one Helena Kobrin - claimed to my then ISP Force9, that her client owned the copyright to the Xemu leaflet I had written and webbed there. This was a lie. You should not expect me to believe anything you claim without the proper proof I reasonably requested from you.

> considering that the photograph was copied from an RTC publication.
> Furthermore, your refusal concerning this matter, combined with your
> continued infringing activities (our office has had to write to you
> and eventually your internet service providers on several past
> occasions regarding similar infringements), is also clear evidence
> of your bad faith and your intent to maliciously and intentionally
> infringe upon our clients' copyrighted works. Your immediate
> posting to the internet of my letter further confirms that intent.
>
> Your conduct is a direct violation of UK copyright law, and you
> need to remove the photograph immediately. No further notification
> to you will be sent.
>
> Sincerely,
> Ava Paquette
> Moxon & Kobrin
> 3055 Wilshire Boulevard
> Suite 900
> Los Angeles, California 90010
> Tel: (213) 487-4468
> Fax: (213) 487-5385
Bearing in mind all that you have written (if it indeed be from you and from your office considering the weak and childish legal logic employed) then you can respectfully GO FUCK YOURSELF.

Yours, Roland Rashleigh-Berry

Go Back