Now at http://www.lisatrust.net/legal/rinder_aff_99.htm
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Case No. CRC 98-20377CFANO-S
vs.
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG
SERVICE ORGANIZATION
SPNNO.01980179
AFFIDAVIT OF REVEREND MICHAEL J. RINDER
Reverend[sic] Michael J. Rinder, being duly sworn, deposes and says:
1. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this affidavit,
and if called upon as a witness, I could and would competently testify
thereto.
2. I am a director of the Church of Scientology International ("CSI").
CSI is the "mother church" of the Scientology religion. CSI provides
guidance and assistance to Scientology churches around the world, and
is directly concerned with their stability and vitality, their ability
to continue to propagate the religion, and the spiritual well-being of
the parishioners they serve.
3. In my capacity as a CSI director and in furtherance of the purposes
and functions of CSI as set forth in the preceding paragraph of this
Affidavit, I became concerned about the
impact that the charges brought in this case would have on the
Scientology religion, on Scientology churches, including defendant
Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization
("FSO"), and on individual Scientologists throughout the world. I have
witnessed the results of media coverage which has persistently labeled
these proceedings as the prosecution of the entire religion itself,
and the disturbing reactions such characterizations have engendered.
4. In charging the Church, the impact was predictable and has now been
demonstrated. That impact has stigmatized all Scientology churches
and all Scientologists because of the
1
widespread perception generated that the entire Scientology religion
has been charged. Literally no Scientologist anywhere in the world is
free from or immune to the public impression that those who practice
the Scientology religion are suspect by association.
5. The statistics vividly illustrate my point. Articles characterizing
the scope of these charges and labeling the accused as "Scientology,"
"Scientologists," or the generic "Church of Scientology" have appeared in over 255 newspapers in the United States, Australia, Canada, Denmark, England, France, Germany, Japan, the Netherlands and Spain.
Analysis of the international media coverage reveals that 31 percent
reported that "Scientology" was charged with the crime, 66 percent
reported that the generalized "Church of Scientology" was charged, and
only 3 percent accurately reported that FSO was the target of the
charges. To illustrate just how broadly this has been disseminated, a
list of the newspapers and wire services where such articles have been
published is annexed to this Affidavit as Exhibit A, and a
representative sampling of such coverage is annexed as Exhibit B.
6. Together, the newspapers and magazines identified in Exhibit A to
this Affidavit have circulation of more than 48,650,000. The wire
services identified in Exhibit A to this Affidavit supply news
coverage to well over 500,000 subscribing media outlets, and even
accounting for overlapping subscribers to such wire services, their
reports reach millions of additional readers around the world.
7. Similarly, radio and television broadcasts generally stigmatizing
"Scientology" or the "Church of Scientology" with suggestions of
culpability in Ms. McPherson ' s death and the resulting criminal
charges have reached well over 50,000,000 viewers and listeners. A
list of the radio and television stations which have broadcast such
stories is annexed to this Affidavit as Exhibit C.
2
8. Another tangible result of the entire church being charged is
anti-Scientologists have used the case as a springboard for more
attacks on Scientology churches and their parishioners worldwide.
Anti-Scientology hate groups have organized picketing that has
occurred around the world. These "protests" are not orderly
demonstrations. Instead, they are raucous and provocative assemblages,
marked by taunts, insults, and even threats of violence. Since few, if
any, of the "protestors" are disaffected former Scientologists, there
is no other purported "cause" for their rallies, apart from the case
of State of Florida v. Church of Scientology. Moreover, the vast
majority of such "protests" have taken place at premises other than
FSO, although some of the most provocative have been in Clearwater.
9. The following is a representative example to illustrate my point.
The Information in this case was filed on November 13,1998. Widespread media coverage followed. On December 4, 1998, a group of "protestors"
-none of whom even lived in Clearwater- began their demonstration in Clearwater by convening a press conference which they commenced by announcing, "Welcome to occupied Clearwater." Then, having obtained a permit from the Chief M-Police of Clearwater in an extraordinarily abbreviated application/approval process -of approximately one business day's duration -these "protestors" occupied the entire public sidewalk in front of FSO. During the course of that "protest," they:
blocked the path of parishioners arriving for, and leaving after, religious services with, among other things, a coffin with "Scientology Kills" painted on it;
shouted anti-Scientology epithets through a bullhorn, disrupting religious services inside the building;
chased the vans which FSO was forced to provide for the safe
transportation of its parishioners;
3
vilified those same parishioners with personal barbs, taunted them and
waved hateful, demeaning placards about their religion, with slogans
such as the following:
"Blood on $cientology Hands" with an autopsy photograph of Ms.
McPherson's hand "Scientology, The Church With A Body Count"
"Scientology: Doctors of Death!"
"Lisa Macpherson [sic]: Killed by her Church?"
"Thank God L. Ron Hubbard is Dead"
"Honk if you Hate Scientology!"
verbally taunted Church staff with personal insults regarding such
things as their mother's supposed sexual indiscretions; and
made profane threats of physical violence against ecclesiastical
leaders of the religion. (A representative sampling of photographs of
the Clearwater demonstrations is annexed to this Affidavit as Exhibit
D.)
10. In December of 1998, anti-Scientologists purchased advertising
space on Pinellas County buses which they used for anonymous signs
exhorting people, "Don't Walk, RUN ! Quit $cientology," and "Find Out
Why So Many People Oppose Dianetics & Scientology." (Exhibit
E.) The bus ads were so offensive that one of the Pinellas Suncoast
Transit Authority ("PSTA ") commissioners demanded they be taken down
immediately. After they were removed, the anti- Scientologists
appeared at several PSTA board meetings, threatening legal action
against the
PSI A for refusing to carry their anti-religious message.
11. During the last six weeks of 1998, following the filing of the
Information in this case, nearly two dozen such "protests" took place
in the United States (including Washington, D.C.;
4
Atlanta, Georgia; Buffalo, New York; Boston, Massachusetts; Chicago,
Illinois; Tustin, California; Salt Lake City, Utah; Minneapolis,
Minnesota; San Francisco, California; San Jose, California; and
Phoenix, Arizona) and in cities around the world (including Toronto,
Canada; London, England; Copenhagen, Denmark; Stockholm, Sweden; and
Brisbane, Australia). They bore signs imputing responsibility for Ms.
McPherson ' s death to the Scientology religion such as the following:
"Scientology Indicted"
"Scientology Kills"
"Scientology killed Lisa McPherson"
"Scientology HURTS PEOPLE"
"Scientology Hurts People. Who will be next?"
"Scientology is a Scam"
"Scientology Charged [in] Lisa's Death"
"Lisa McPherson is dead"
Don't forget Lisa McPherson, killed by Scientologists"
"Say No to Scientology -What on Earth do $cientologists Believe in Anyway?"
Annexed to this Affidavit as Exhibit F is a representative sampling of
photographs of these protests.
12. In 1999, similar anti-Scientology demonstrations targeting the
religion have been staged throughout the United States (including
Atlanta, Georgia; San Jose, California; Phoenix, Arizona; Los Angeles,
California; Los Gatos, California; Washington, D.C.; Dallas, Texas;
and Salt Lake City, Utah) and elsewhere in the world (including
Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Sussex, England; and Toronto, Canada). The
slogans printed on protestors' signs in those
5
demonstrations included:
"Scientology hurts people. Who will be next?"
"Stop hurting people"
"Scientology indicted in death of Lisa McPherson, December 5, 1995"
"Scientology is a Scam"
"Scientology is a cult"
"Scientology didn't believe in God"
"Scientology. Criminal cult of Greed, Fraud, Hate and Abuse"
"Scientology proud to be evil"
"L. Ron Hubbard is dead but his fraud continues!"
"Scientology, threat to democracy!"
"Scientology should not be tax exempt"
"Lisa McPherson killed by her Church"
"Is Scientology practicing medicine without a license?"
"Scientology, Cult of Greed & Power"
"Scientology boasts of brainwashing"
13. The widespread, international demonstrations described above,
which exploit allegations relating to Ms. McPherson' s death to
stigmatize an international religion and its adherents, establish that
the charges in this case are being interpreted as directed against the
entire Scientology religion rather than against the defendant. It is
highly improbable there is a single Scientologist across the globe who
has not been confronted with the allegation his or her religion killed
one of its own members. Indeed, the false attributions of
responsibility to the religion itself have become so widely publicized
that even foreign governments have raised
6
inquiries. In December of 1998, a member of the Danish parliament
asked for an investigation into allegations regarding the Church' s
treatment of Ms. McPherson. The questions raised by the Danish
parliamentarian were directed toward the beliefs and practices of the
Scientology religion, and not the conduct of any corporation or
individuals.
14. So pervasive is the perception that the religion or the entire
"Church of Scientology" has been charged in connection with Ms.
McPherson' s death, that it even appears to have reached into the courthouse. Exhibit G to this Affidavit is a true and correct copy of a notice served upon defendant FSO by the Court in which the caption identifies the defendant as "Church of Scientology" without reference to "Flag Service Organization" or "FSO."
15. Although I recognize that the State neither writes the stories nor
the headlines, the fact of charging FSO has been interpreted publicly
as a sound denunciation of the Scientology religion and all its
parishioners as criminally complicit. A March 28, 1999 article in the
St. Petersburg Times encapsulates the essence of this perception. At
the conclusion of a two-and- one-half page front-page article, the
Times reporter wrote: "Cranes over downtown Clearwater stand in
testament to the church' s continued growth as the church and its
members change the
7
face of that city. But standing in the way is Pinellas-Pasco State
Attorney Bernie McCabe, the prosecutor and a fresh charge that strikes
at the heart of Scientology's claim that it helps its adherents."
(Emphasis added.)
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT.
[signed]
Reverend[sic] Michael J. Rinder
STATE OF FLORIDA )
) ss.:
County of Pinellas ) "
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 9th day of
May, 1999, by Reverend Michael J. Rinder, who is personally known to
me and who did take an oath.
[signed]
ASHER SAMUEL GHIORA
MY COMMISSION. CC69144S
EXPIRES October 26.2001
I trust this will be laughed out of court like the joke it is.
StukaFox
Right.
-- | Chris Owen - chriso@OISPAMNOlutefisk.demon.co.uk | |---------------------------------------------------------------| | THE TRUTH ABOUT L. RON HUBBARD AND THE UNITED STATES NAVY | | http://www.ronthewarhero.org |
It is so full of legal holes that I am surprised it was even submitted.
1) Rinder's "Reverend" title is bogus. He did not attend a school of theology. Rather, he took a Scientology course that can be completed in less than two weeks. The course's major textbook is a survey of world religions.
2) Legally, Rinder fails to show any quantitative damage to CSI.
Newspapers enjoy broad freedom under the 1st Amendment. Rinder's principal point seems to be that FSO (rather than "Scientology") should have been identified by the press. Sorry, Mike, but this is one disadvantage of the CSI corporate hydra. You made the bed, now lay in it.
3) Rinder attempts to paint the protests as religious bigotry. This is a constant theme from OSA. It fails when "parishoners" are treated with respect (thanks, protestors for adhering to Ghandi Tech).
4) Rinder attempts to confuse the so-called "religion" of Scientology with the institution of Scientology. In fact, Scientology is practiced by the Free Zone, and the tech and the institution are two separate things.
All critics should be quick to make the distinction between religion and institution when OSA deliberately attempts to blur the line. Once the line is blurred, then the "bigotry" name-calling is more likely to succeed. It's a public service to expose a consumer fraud, but it's bigotry to deny someone the right to believe they're possessed by the spirits of murdered space aliens.
5) While Rinder would like us to believe that only Flag Service Organization is responsible for Lisa McPherson, in fact FSO was only following the "religious procedure" of the Introspection Rundown.
The same procedure that led to McPherson's death is also followed without variation at Saint Hill, ASHO, and other high-level Orgs.
6) The much larger issue is that CST and RTC are licensing the use of a product which, if used as directed, is known to cause psychosis and even death in certain circumstances. In spite of knowing this, CST and RTC have not changed the product. If CSI were Firestone tire company, they would be testifying before Congress right now. Fortunately, Scientology does not kill as many people as defective tires do.
Perry Scott, SP 4.3, ScienoSitter 3X + ISP + 2 words
Co$ Escapee