On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 00:52:40 -0800, Zinj <zinjifar@yahoo.com> wrote:
>In article <400b9678$0$19263$626a54ce@news.free.fr>,
>gonnet@antisectes.net says...
>> "Crzwdjk" <crzwdjk@hotmail.com> a écrit dans le message de
>> news:31692f90.0401190028.22b2e3b5@posting.google.com...
>> > While browsing the web, I found a banner ad on a scientology site for
>> > an ISP called thunderstar networks. This appears to be at least a semi
>> > legitimate canadian ISP, and it is definitly run by a scientologist,
>> > judging by the style that the Acceptable Use Policy is written in
>> > (with mentions of the proliferation of drugs psychiatry leading to the
>> > decay of society). Take a look on their website www.thunderstar.net
>> > for more. They also mention that they are looking to buy out other
>> > ISPs, which they seem to have done at least once (lynx.org). Just
>> > thought this might be an interesting bit of information that I haven't
>> > seen mentioned before.
>> how or why did you determine that?
>>
>> I've not seen something in thei site. Could you give us the links to check
>> for scientology infiltration?
>>
>> r
>I suspect his suspicions are founded in the amazingly wordy
>'acceptable use policy' at:
>
>http://www.thunderstar.net/acceptable.html
>
>It might be a bit of a jump to *conclude* that the author of
>that policy is a Scientologist, but there are plenty of
>buzzwords and attitudes that raise the suspicion.
>
>Zinj
http://www.thunderstar.net/acceptable.html
Three little snip ditty's telling me the author/webmaster is a bit
more than suspicious:
Giveaway points: (*)
snip> criminals do make up a increasing percentage of our society due to the proliferation of drugs, *psychiatry* and violence in the media. *Such institutions* turn out criminals and perverts of an unthinkable nature on an alarming rate so were really not out of line in streetproofing our kids and ourselves against it.*
snip> Where a site or posting appears to be harmful (but possibly lawful none the less) always bring the site and its address to the attention of the Webmaster. Note this would also cover sites that promote heavy or inappropriate use of legal drugs or and use of weapons, illegal drugs or alcohol or any other controlled substance, irresponsible practices, *psychiatric spin offs*, *perversions of the education system, (for example sites promoting the drugging in schools of children) etc*... Such sites will be reviewed for removal under this policy.
snip> More over the very small handful of criminals perverts, drug dealers, and the products of various *psychiatric spin offs* will tend to pray on normal folk unless restrained. And though these individuals, as they undoubtedly will whine, have rights too, BUT! Their "rights" do not extend into allowing them access to the more fortunate majority of folk in a way that could be compromising, the protection of whom this document is intended. It really otherwise is none of anyone's business what users do or don't do on line. But to keep things afloat I find it necessary to place these few restrictions in place at this time.
Z-blade