In article<987470891.3adb9c2b3333f@webmail.cotse.com>, Delafano@cotse.com writes:

>Based on the below posts some questions are answered however some
>are not:
Well, let's see, here are some obvious questions which occur to me.

A. When Top Padgett committed this traffic offence, had the management of the Lisa MacPherson trust -- named after a woman whom the Scientology cult killed by medical neglect -- made any DECISION ("I don't care if he's had a few, send him driving on that errand anyway") or POLICY ("don't tell me when our van drivers have been drinking, I don't want to know unless they actually drive unsafely") which would make them at least morally responsible for it?

B. What was Tom Padgett's relationship to the Lisa MacPherson trust -- named after a woman the Scientology cult killed by medical neglect -- for example:

B1. was he an employee or a volunteer at the office?
B2. Did he EVER enter their building?
B3. Did he have extensive communication with them?
B4. Was he just some guy who said they do a good job??
C. If B4 is true, how would you describe someone who tries to blame the Lisa MacPherson trust -- named after a woman the Scientology cult killed by medical neglect -- for the unconnected actions of any person who once or twice expressed support for them:

C1. Drooling cult fuckbungee?
C2. Functionally insane?
C3. Lacking the intelligence god gave a bivalve?
C2. All of the above??
D. Which is worse, traffic offences or locking someone up for 17 days without proper food and water?

Thank you for playing "spot the Clamhead", and goodnight.

Go Back