Introduction: This is the first entry in my Wollersheim Collection Ongoing Trial blog relating to my nearly completed collection efforts against the destructive mind control cult Scientology. This blog is dedicated to informing the world of Scientology's real nature and to counter the efforts of Tom Cruise, John Travolta and other Hollywood celebrities who are promoting this dangerous mind control cult. It is also dedicated to help educate, heal and encourage the hundreds of thousands of people who have been harmed by Scientology and other cults all over the world to use the legal system to get justice and restitution. If you are new the history of the 25 year litigation conflict and the previous success of my collection efforts see http://www.factnet.org/Healing.html#Litigation and the link called Special Update on 8.6 Million Dollar Wollersheim Scientology Collection Success and Refund Success Tips for Ex-Scientologists...

What Happened in Day 1 and 2 of Wollersheim collection trial in LA on Nov 2-3:

As you would expect in any trial involving Scientology and myself it started off with a bang. A senior intelligence operative of Scientology's OSA division (who is also the wife of Lynn Farney or Varney one of Scientology's highest ranking executives) was caught trying to tamper with the jury over a two day period.

After the tampering was discovered the judge had the sheriff's deputies detain this woman on day two and issued her a court order that she be barred from the courthouse then had her photographed and escorted by several sheriffs out of the court house. The judge was then required to interview each juror and as far as we are in the process this is what various jurors have said:

Hers how it came down according to juror sworn testimony.

1.) This female OSA agent moved from prospective juror group to group in hall outside the court room.

2.) It was she that She spoke first to the Prospective Juror..

3.) She said knew me Lawrence Wollersheim for 20 years and she had an extraordinary amount of information about my litigation history.

4.) She said I had an earlier lawsuit.

5.) She said that neither party in this case should get anything. Then there was a then a discussion by 4-6 prospective jurors that they only way that could happen was a hung jury.

6.) During these jury tampering events she apparently heard one of the prospective jurors talking about an article in a current magazine and then mysteriously about an hour latter just happened to have that magazine to share with that juror.

7.) She did not identify herself when asked as anything but an observer. She said noting about her being in Scientology.

When questioned by the judge, some jurors said they felt she was trying to influence them and she was trying to get their opinions about the case.

This whole discovery of the Scientology jury tampering came about because I sat down next to this high ranking Scientology covert intelligence operative in the hall outside the courtroom to send her a clear signal I will not be intimidated by the previous death threats on me and my family ordered by and with the knowledge of the very highest officials of Scientology (her husband included). While sitting next to her to send my no fear signal, I did not realize that I should not also be sitting near prospective jurors. While sitting there as a temporary diversion from the silence and the obvious weird energy coming from the busted Scientology covert operative, I asked the person on the other side of me only about their Blackberry PDA and how they liked it.

Later when I was being legitimately and properly chastised by the judge for sitting near prospective jurors and asking anything no matter how unrelated it was to the case, one or more of the jurors started talking about some sloppy and overweight woman talking to them about the case. My inadvertent comment to the prospective juror almost as an act of Providence, unearthed Scientology's criminal and intentional jury tampering scheme.

Later the judge told the jury that what I did was wrong and improper, but he did not tell most of the jurors that all I did was ask about a blackberry. The judge did not clearly tell the jurors that there was an obvious attempt to tamper with the jury by a high ranking intelligence operative of Scientology even after she was identified as such. He then told all of the jurors that the woman attempting the jury tampering is not associated with either party.

Many of the jury in his individual interviews stated that they have formed a negative emotional first impression of me and it will be difficult for them to overcome it. Some jurors said that:

1.) It was I that was intentionally trying to influence the jury by sitting next to and talking to the one prospective juror who unknown to me was an attorney,

2.) I was unethical,

3.) I am trying to throw the case,

4.) I have poor judgment

5.) I am dumb,

6.) My actions indicate bad character that wont change

Only one Juror seemed to understand that the Scientology Intel officer was trying to influence them and they walked away.

It is my firm belief that there currently is a serious prejudicial imbalance and bias towards me and to my case and a serious contamination of the jury by Scientology's actions. I do not believe it is possible to get a fair trial with this biased and contaminated juror pool. We asked for a new jury pool. We asked for a mistrial. The judge denied everything.

In testimony it came out that Prospective Jurors have been talking about these events among themselves including discussing the sheriffs escorting the Scientology operative who had been talking to some of them out of the courthouse. The judge told the jury pool to stop doing this.

Today we are going to ask for the 20 plus additional prospective jurors to be individually interviewed because of further juror contamination of the alternate juror pools being discovered in testimony at the very end of the day.

We expect Scientology attorneys to appear today to create a PR cover story like "she was just an observer her first amendment rights are being violated" for the intelligence operative wife of one of Scientology's highest executives. This would be intended to direct attention away from the attempted criminal jury tampering by Scientology.

When this operative was brought before the judge by the sheriffs she was told she did not need to say anything on the record and could get an attorney, but instead when asked by the judge if she had talked to any of the prospective jurors about anything relating to the case, she put on her most sincere face and then lied though her teeth to the judge and told him she never said anything to any of the jurors about the case. She did not know that the judge had just finished about 4 hours of under oath questioning of 14 jurors of whom about 6-7 independently and separately confirmed what she had said and done with each of them.

When this operative was escorted out of the court the attorney for the other side starts a vigorous defense of this Scientology covert operative saying that it was all an innocent mistake and she was sorry for it and it was not a big deal. His client knew she was a high ranking Scientology intel operative and fully knows the dirty tricks that they do. It would be unreasonable to believe her attorney was not advised who she was. Not only did he defend her/Scientology at this occurrence he made several other very odd defenses of the positive character of Scientology.

I do believe the judge is an honest and fair man trying to do his best. Like anyone new to the horrors of scientology and coming to grips with the fact that Scientology runs a CIA like intelligence division with a covert operations budget greater than many small countries around the world, it is going to take him a while to come up to speed and get it.

I sincerely do not believe the judge yet fully understands that Scientology is here in full covert opps force to sabotage his court, deadlock or influence the jury and stop me from collecting the last of my judgment --- all because they fear hundreds of millions of dollars in new lawsuits from Scientology victims all over the world when they hear that every thin dime of the 87 million this dimes they were ordered to pay me was paid.

Sooner or later I believe he will see enough evidence to set drastically higher security surrounding the trial and consult with those in the LA court house who did the original Wollersheim so that he is more realistically prepared for evidence tampering, threats and bribes to jurors and the one or two covert Scientology agents who already have most likely made it into his prospective jury pool to carry out the goals of Scientology in this case.

Sooner or later he will get that there is a third party active in multiple intelligence operations on this case and his court. (Scientology never does any intel operation with just one operative. They always use 3 or more. They don't even trust the reports of their own people and use multiple report verification methods and they always have backup for the covert operative like Lynn Farney"s wife who get caught or have their cover blown.)

More in my next trial update blog when I can get it done. I will not be able to answer individual email during the trial. Any help getting this distributed around the Internet will be deeply appreciated.

Lawrence Wollersheim
Personally and as a Director of www.Factnet.org

IANAL

IMHO

11/4/2005 8:55:06 AM
_________________
Lermanet.com Exposing the CON
Judge Brinkema 29 Nov 1995

"the Court is now convinced that the primary motivation of RTC [$cientology] in suing Lerma, DGS and The Post is to stifle criticism of Scientology in general and to harass its critics." Arnaldo Lerma Lermanet.com Exposing the CON

I'd prefer to die speaking my mind than live fearing to speake

If the Borg were to breed with the Ferengi you'd get Scientology!

29 November 1995 - Memorandum Opinion Judge Leonie Brinkema "the Court is now convinced that the primary motivation of RTC in suing Lerma, DGS and The Post is to stifle criticism of Scientology in general and to harass its critics. "

The internet is the Liberty Tree

http://www.lermanet.com/faqs.html
http://www.lermanet.com/exit/hubbard-the-hypnotist.htm
http://www.lermanet.com/scientology/altreligionscientology-killfile-settings.htm
http://www.lermanet.com/scientologynews/crowley-hubbard-666.htm
http://www.lermanet.com/scientologynews/flint-suicides-in-scientology-040383.htm
both with IMAGES!!

"Scientologists believe that most human problems can be traced to lingering spirits of an extraterrestrial people massacred by their ruler, Xenu, over 75 million years ago. These spirits attach themselves by "clusters" to individuals in the contemporary world, causing spiritual harm and negatively influencing the lives of their hosts" [Judge Leonie Brinkema 4 Oct 96 Memorandum Opinion]

What do we get from getting people out of scientology? We create an individual who has become a Houdini of all mind traps.. folks who won't be fooled again. People who can DE-program, People who can spring mental traps..

We create, by freeing someone of scientology, a being who has the ability to break the strongest slave chains of all.

Those forged of lies. (c) Arnaldo Lerma

From: chuckbeatty77@aol.com
Subject: Re: Scientology OSA Farny caught jury tampering Nov 2005 - Wollersheim
Date: 4 Nov 2005 22:42:20 -0800
Message-ID: <1131172940.184952.55690@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>

Lermanet.com wrote: snip

> As you would expect in any trial involving Scientology and myself it
> started off with a bang. A senior intelligence operative of
> Scientology's OSA division (who is also the wife of Lynn Farney or
> Varney one of Scientology's highest ranking executives) was caught
> trying to tamper with the jury over a two day period.

I can confirm that Ellen is married to Lynn, or was, as of 2003-2004. I saw them together in 2004 sitting outside the laundromat, doing their laundry no doubt, corner of Sunset and Normandie, which is one of the laundromats people living in the Anthony Building (middle management berthing building) in LA.

I know Ellen from being on the PAC RPF at the same time she was. I arrived PAC RPF (from the Int RPF) in Nov 2000. Ellen was there then, and Ellen graduated sometime in 2002 I believe.

She definitely is OSA and had been for years. I know Lynn and Ellen by sight, although I am not an acquaintance of Lynn, but I was at least an acquaintance of Ellen and could identify a photo of her.

Ellen blew the PAC RPF in 2001 I think. I hope she someday defects, as she then can disclose her actions. She likely will go to the PAC RPF for what she's done.

I think she will likely blow eventually, since this level of incompetence of tampering a jury, and this getting exposed, and hopefully this will gain press, and recoil on OSA, thus Ellen will likely be RPFed.

I doubt she will make it through the RPF, and likely this will have repercussions with her marriage, and possibly could trigger a dual defection of Lynn and her, and THAT would be some BAD NEWS, but actually good news, since it might then blow open several decades of undisclosed operations that Lynn intimately knows about.

I hope they both defect and expose and get immunity, and help authorities take any legal action necessary to force OSA to get straight!

Chuck Beatty
chuckbeatty77 @aol.com
412-260-1170

>
> After the tampering was discovered the judge had the sheriff's
> deputies detain this woman on day two and issued her a court order
> that she be barred from the courthouse then had her photographed and
> escorted by several sheriffs out of the court house. The judge was
> then required to interview each juror and as far as we are in the
> process this is what various jurors have said:

snip

> Lawrence Wollersheim

thankyou Arnie, and thankyou Larry Wollersheim!!!!

This is so bad, Ellen is toast, and that might bode well, as she blew once, and she knows how long it takes to complete the RPF. If they boot her out of the Sea Org now, that means Lynn will have to divorce her, etc., etc, and that means his job is in jeopardy, which means serious repercussions in OSA Int around Lynn's job zone.

This is just disgraceful but needs to be exposed in the media.

thankyou very much!!!

Chuck

From: "Magoo" <magoo44@charter.net>
Subject: My Actions in the Wallersheim Trial
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 23:21:41 -0800
Message-ID: <436c5d86$1@news2.lightlink.com>

I was in Scientology when someone I knew, Larry Wallersheim, sued the Church of Scientology, in the mid-80's here in LA.

At the time I was seriously "In", a member, and what I now call a "True believer". I totally believed Scientology was the greatest, and anyone attacking it had to be an evil, bad person.

We were all told to go down to the courthouse, the day the trial began. Lined in the LA courthouse were hundreds of Scientologists out in the hall. I was told the only people who would be allowed into the courtroom were "OT 7's". (At the time I was an OT 3, and that is a long way from an OT 7, in their world). Mainly they wanted OT 7's in there in case anything 'confidential' came up, it wouldn't be new to them. Also, Scientologists believed these OT 7's could actually influence the courtroom, which turned out to be totally false.

Ok, so being me, I wanted to get into the courtroom, just to see first hand. I wasn't willing to stand outside in the halls, or parade outside chanting "Not one thin dime for Wall er sheim", as many did. So I asked my friend, Bill Yaude, and he said he'd help get me in the first day, which he did.

Once in, I knew my days were numbered as I wasn't an OT 7, which would soon be noticed. With that, I figured I'd better do something worthwhile, so I began to create my 'post'.

What did I do?

I basically labeled each juror, by number. Whenever a question was asked, I'd jot down who was pro and who was against, or any other thing that occurred, including what the Judge was doing or how he looked. I did this all throughout the first day, and then walked out at the end.

Immediately some people from OSA came up to me and said, "We are from "Invest" (investigations) and we need to see your notes". I said, "Sure" and handed them to these men.

The next day I was told, "We need you in there to continue doing what you're doing". Bingo...I thought. So I did just that, and it was interesting to note what went on, day to day. Some jurors were playing tick tack toe during some boring points. The Judge more than once fell asleep. It seemed like many were against Wallersheim, but that turned out to not be true. So much for the Invest actions.

I've told Larry personally that I was sorry for being against him, and he has totally understood where I was coming from. Last year he came to a party at my home, and we all enjoyed his interesting stories. Larry never was dull.

Scientology is famous for manipulating courtrooms, and I can attest that I am sorry to say I was one of their members who spent quite a bit of time trying to help them manipulate various court cases.

I was also in the Mayo RICO trial. Not that I did anything, but I was one of the 7 or 8 who were invited to be in the courtroom. That was one fascinating case...........and I still will never forget the detail Scientology had gone through to nail David Mayo. Truly, it blew my mind that they would do the things they did.

Of course Scientology claimed they 'won'. The truth, I found out many years later after I left Scientology forever, was that they paid off David Mayo, big bucks. Who knew?

I'm not sure why this came to mind, but I thought I'd mention it. Just one more piece of the Magoo Puzzle. I figure I'll never know exactly what things will help who, but the truth is better spoken than not.

--
Tory/Magoo~Dancing in the moonlight~
In Scientology for 30 years, out happily for 5 years!
For thinking and speaking my mind, I am:
Declared SP and Expelled from C of S (Woo hoo!)
(SP 6 ^ with Cumulative Cluster)
Free at LAST!
For more information about this, please see:
http://www.xenu.net
http://www.xenutv.com
http://www.torymagoo.org
http://www.lermanet.com/cos/toryonosa.htm
http://www.altreligionscientology.org

magoo44@charter.net "Those that give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin

Burbank, CA (818) 841-3632

Go Back