Alec Grynspan Corrects Appleton'e Lies

From: Alec Grynspan
To: Laurie Appleton
KS>> I have no idea what you are babbling about - I didn't
KS>> write any of this.

LA> It is apparent that you don't have any idea about your LA> evolutionary FAITH either. It is probably no better than a

What evolutionary faith? Please don't attribute your own deteriorated mental state to others, Laurie.

LA> (Newsweek, 3/11/80, p. 54)

Remarkable! No matter how many times you get shown up as a misquoting liar, you repeat the same misquotes!

All of your claims are mere repetions of debunked material, out of context quotes, distortions of terminology or just plain strawmen. A good number of these can be found at

The few times that you have not quoted out of context with the original source, you have quoted out of context with the argument - to the point of selecting material that contradicts your claims. That you are so ignorant that you would use such material shows the bankruptcy of your position.

You constantly define and redefine evolution so as to raise strawman arguments, because you have no other. All of your purported evidence against evolution fails, because it fails the litmus of scientific evidence. As an example: You bring forth diatribe after diatribe showing that evolution could not take place because life could not have formed by random chance, yet nowhere in evolutionary theory is this present. You evade the challenge to show where this nonsense came from.

You try to demonize evolution and anyone challenging you by deliberately placing all non-creationists in the same position of being evolutionists - even though creationism is a cult and evolution is a science that only some scientists are involved with.

Your rants and evasions notwithstanding, you have said nothing here except to admit, yet again, that Creationism is nothing but a religious cult. You provide no scientific evidence, no data and resort to every childish tactic possible each time you are proven wrong, which happens on virtually every message that you send. You show that, at your very best, you are little more than a liar - trying desperately to deny reality.

The more that you are challenged with actual scientific rebuttal and demands for actual evidence, the more likely that you will resort to nonsense conspiracy theories, personal attacks or denying that evolution is both fact and theory. It becomes obvious when you know that you have really lost, because you will resort to name-calling of the lowest order and even outright evasion of the material presented by trying to brush it aside.

Whatever you present is useless and nonsense until such time as you provide scientific evidence supporting Creationism and a scientific theory to bind the evidence together. Until then you have said nothing at all and are permanently debunked.