Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com Subject: Federal court hearing Message-ID: <9506241630.0N6U401@support.com> References: <3s54th$iif@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150 X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35/PRIMP 1.56p Distribution: world Date: Sat, 24 Jun 95 16:30:26 -0700 Lines: 37 grady@netcom.com (Grady Ward) Me: >: He said Grady and I had public discussions that amounted to a >: conspiracy to flood Internet with their trade secrets. It >: was an serious accusation which I absolutely deny. G-Man: >I also categorically deny this allegation. > >Question: Do litigants have immunity from slander in arguments >before a Federal court? I doubt it with this type of assertion. It's was made in open court and will be obvious in the court record. >This is another instance of criminal cult lying attorneys: the first >was Helena K. Kobrin lying that I had infringed their copyright at >all. True. >If these conspiratorial plottings were "public" as Cooley avers, then >it should be easy for him to *produce* these "public discussions." > >But he can't because they do not exist and he is simply another >paid cult liar. Cooly is slime. +--------------------------------------+ Rev. Dennis L Erlich * * the inFormer * * dennis.l.erlich@support.com + inForm@primenet.com "tar baby"