Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: Federal court hearing
Message-ID: <9506250856.0CKMO00@support.com>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35/PRIMP 1.56p
Distribution: world
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 95 08:56:59 -0700
Lines: 32


sgoehrin@copper.ucs.indiana.edu (scott goehring)

>Raskolnikov <bpharmon@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu> wrote:
>She did not get into the fact that no federal marshall was present
>for the raid, or any of the other accompanying shenanigans.

Scott:
>nor would i have expected her to.  the matter of the legality of the
>raid does not appear to have been an issue which would pertain to the
>mtions being argued at that hearing.  i'm sure it will come up
>eventually, but not until the court is actually entertaining Dennis'
>counterclaims.  at this point the court has not yet even begun to
>consider the case itself, just great heaping hordes of pre-trial
>motions.

    Yes and no.
    
    They did not argue the motion to vacate the Writ of Seizure 
    specifically in court.  However the grounds for the issuance 
    of it were completely dismantled in the papers before Whyte 
    and the general presentation of Carla and Harold did 
    reinforce the fact that the writ was granted without the 
    proper conditions of law having been met.
    
            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
      dennis.l.erlich@support.com  +  inForm@primenet.com
                           "tar baby"