Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com Subject: Are copyrights assets tha Message-ID: <9506281019.0EIJ000@support.com> Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150 X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35/PRIMP 1.56p Distribution: world Date: Wed, 28 Jun 95 10:19:54 -0700 Lines: 40 noring@netcom.com (Jon Noring) >In article wbarwell@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (William Barwell) writes: >In article Hillel wrote: > >>#It may cause the Co$ to lose the trial, but then Erlich will >>#have to serve Miscavige with some legal papers to collect... > >>In article peter@petermc.demon.co.uk (Peter McDermott) writes: > >>>No, this can't happen. It was RTC that sued Erlich, not one of >>>the Churches or Orgs. So Erlich gets his settlement from RTC. >>>Given that they collect the copyright dough, in order to cry >>>poverty, they'd have to admit that nobody was buying Dianetics >>>or any courses. > >>Why can't RTC transfer all the copyrights to another >>organization for $1, and then let Erlich collect this $1? > >Cause it is illegal. Transferring assets to avoid payment of a >legal judgement is not a good thing to be caught doing. > >Let's assume that RTC is the copyright owner for many of the high-level CoS >materials (some say that CST is the owner, and RTC defends them). Let's >also assume that Dennis Erlich countersues RTC due to the irregularities of >the raid on him, and further assume that he wins big time and is awarded >substantial damages. In the event that RTC tries to pull a "Wollersheim" on >Dennis, that is, try to avoid paying the court award, can Dennis seize the >copyrights as assets? > >Jon Noring I believe so, yes. +--------------------------------------+ Rev. Dennis L Erlich * * the inFormer * * dennis.l.erlich@support.com + inForm@primenet.com "tar baby"