Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: SCIENTOLOGY AND KIDS
Message-ID: <9507141219.0HB6I02@support.com>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 95 12:19:19 -0700
Lines: 116


anon2c9e@nyx10.cs.du.edu (henry)

Miller/vera:
>[the sort of droolings from cmiller which have already
>generated tons of cash for the dennis erlich defense fund
>deleted]

Me:
>    Oh, you'll get a break alright, OSA scumbag.  An arc break,
>    when we track you down and drag your sorry ass into court.
>    I think there could even be some jail-time in it for you.
   
Aych:
>wow!  you're almost sounding like ME.  
 
    I am but a mere novice studying your masterful vulgarity, henry.

>y'know, i'm considering
>dropping my nastiness schtick and just being really nice instead,
>and asking polite questions, just 'cause almost everyone here
>seems to be about at a 1.1 tone scale level of 'absolutely and
>utterly pissed' already.
                                   
    You give us an excellent variety of style, and certainly any
    new one will be most welcome.

>    For those readers just joining us, I have answered the above
>    scieno-sponsored accusations in detail before.  Ron Newman's
>    web page has the details.
>
>trust us.
>
>we know they're bullshit.
>
>we've even read the REAL news articles telling the truth about
>this case, and know that you and your family have been subjected
>to abuse by the cult and that this isn't your fault.
                                                                
    It's my fault for ever dragging my loved ones into the cult.

>    Coincidentally, I will be in court today to settle the matter
>    of any arrearages in child support which occurred because of
>    the concealment from me (since 1987) of my youngest daughter
>    by her scieno mother.
>
>    I do try to answer all questions and accusations.
>
>please update.
                                                                
    I hope the San Jose case goes better.

>    OTOH ...
>
>    Miller is not a woman.  He does not have a daughter who works
>
>i've heard similar statements that cmiller can't possibly be a woman.
>
>for some reason, i've generally felt that cmiller _is_ actually a
>woman, but only by context and style.  i may be wrong.  still, if
>cmiller isn't a woman, cmiller is seriously into transvestitism
>at least on the net, and seems to be adept at appearing to be a
>woman.
                                         
    I seriously doubt it.

>    for MoFo.  His post to soc.women was designed to dig up dirt
>    on the lawfirm representing me.  He is a OSA operative who
>    used to be known as Vera.  He probably posts from within the
>
>excellent.  so my identification of 'chris' as 'vera' _isn't_ just
>paranoid bullshit is it?  still, why?  how can we prove their
>identity?
                
    The info he is privy to would only be circulating within the 
    scieno lawfirms or to echelon of OSA.

>    offices of Moxon & Bowels.  He works with Gene Engram and the
>
>from knowledge that 'vera' and 'chris' have had, i think that its
>association with engram is almost certain.  however, i've felt that
>the vera creature is female and might have been intimate with engram.
                                         
    Vera was female.  Both were posting from the same accounts.

>i have a _slight_ suspicion that this creature, which has proven
>more pernicious and inextricable than milne (who was driven off),
>woody (who may have given up spamming and started communicating--
>i've de-killfiled him recently), the conartist, etc., is indeed
>- -AB- or linda woolard or is involved in scientology crimes other
>than those on this newsgroup.
>
>why do you say it's male?