Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: KOOS DECLARE - FULL T
Message-ID: <9507141219.0HB6C02@support.com>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 95 12:19:19 -0700
Lines: 45


hkhenson@shell.portal.com (H Keith Henson)

>H Keith Henson (hkhenson@shell.portal.com) wrote:
>: Rod Keller (rkeller@netaxs.com) wrote:
>: : I've been authorized by my German correspondent to post the full SP
>: : declare of our own Koos Nolst Trenite. Re-reading this just now, I'm
>
>: [mass clip]
>
>: :           3.  PRONOUNCING SCIENTOLOGISTS GUILTY OF THE PRACTICE OF
>: :      STANDARD SCIENTOLOGY.
>
>: Even by clam-cult standards, even by *Koos* standards, this is downright
>: weird!  Any chance this was translated?  "Guilty of the practice"???
>: Am I missing something here, or does the cult itself recognize the
>: status of "practice of standard scientology" as criminal?  Keith Henson
>
>I don't want to follow up my *own* damn post, but can someone (Dennis??)
>or someone else with cult experience make sense out of this SP delclare?

    I don't really see why it's so hard to grasp.  Most of you 
    should be familliar with the Phattman's twisted Droppings by 
    now.
    
    If you say anything to the effect that the RPF is torture, 
    you are pronouncing scienos guilty of the practice of 
    Standard Tek.
    
    If you say that auditing is similar to bio-feedback/hypnosis,
    you've done the same thing.
    
    Get the idea?  It's a catch-all crime for use when anyone 
    questions of criticizes the actions of management.

>Why should "pronouncing scientologists *guilty* of the practice of
>standard Scientology" be cause to be declared SP?  Keith Henson
 
    Above.
    
            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
      dennis.l.erlich@support.com  +  inForm@primenet.com
                           "tar baby"