Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: Dennis Erlich - SP Leader
Message-ID: <9507191821.0PSFF02@support.com>
References: <snopesDBzBt4.7JE@netcom.com>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 95 18:21:28 -0700
Lines: 92


modemac@netcom.com (Modemac)

>You see, the "church" of Scientology is convinced that Dennis Erlich is
>the one "in charge" of the squirrels, SPs, and "persecutors" here on
>alt.religion.scientology.  
 
    Are you saying I'm *not*????

>They believe that he is the one sending out
>orders, and that we are obeying his commands.
                                
    (BTW, I ordered Modemac to write this.  He did a good 
    job, no?)

>Notice how Wonderclam declared that Dennis has "formed a cult" here on
>alt.religion.scientology.  Notice how Robert Marcus keeps referring to
>Dennis Erlich by name, only rarely mentioning anyone else here by name -
>except for Diane Richardson, who is a close friend of Dennis.
    
    He also mention my dog ... er ... but I actually think 
    he was talking about the ars readers.  <no offense>

>Pope Charles posted Helena Kobrin's latest threatening letter, in which
>Kobrin pointed out that there was a restraining order against Dennis, AND
>against all persons "employed" by Dennis Erlich or otherwise under his
>command.  This means that not only is Dennis prohibitied from mentioning
>the so-called "sacred scripture" of Scientology here, but everyone in
>Dennis' "cult" is likewise forbidden.
                                                       
    This was covered in ARS URGENT DIRECTIVE - 18 Jul 1995 - 
    CONSPIRACIES, CONCEALMENT OF.  You all should have a copy by 
    now.

>The "church" of Scientology believes that the restraining order against
>Dennis applies to all of us as well, because we are all "under his
>command."  That's why Kobrin pointed out the restraining order to Pope
>Charles, even though Dennis' name has never been mentioned in the
>discussion of the OT VII materials.
        
    Oat Tea 7 was not on my restricted list from the court.  I 
    can post it to my heart's content.  Only I don't have a copy.
    It was not one of the documents I either posted originally or
    verified as authentic.

>There's only one problem with this: there is no proof.  They can't prove
>that we are all under Dennis command, and until they find some proof there
>is NOTHING they can do to keep us from quoting their "trade secrets" and
>"sacred scriptures" under the terms of Fair Use.
                          
    I'm gonna tell them you're all my slaves. <that's what I tell
    myself>

>What's more, they never WILL prove it.  
 
    They won't have to.  I admit it.

>Of course, WE all know why they
>can't prove that we are under Dennis Erlich's command.  
 
    <shush! it's all covered in the Directive above>

>But they will
>never understand - not until they WAKE UP and stop thinking the way
>Hubbard wanted the world to think!
>
>I therefore make this statement to Helena Kobrin, Warren McShane, and any
>other OSA goons monitoring this newsgroup:
>
>YOU WILL NEVER PROVE THAT I AM EMPLOYED BY OR UNDER THE COMMAND OF DENNIS
>ERLICH.  NEITHER I, NOR ANYONE ELSE HERE.
                                                    
    How about if I show them the payroll stubs?

>You can harass me, you can investigate me, you can do whatever you want.
>
>YOU WILL NEVER PROVE IT.
>
>And we are going to CONTINUE using Fair Use to discuss your so-called
>"trade secrets."  You will NEVER stop us from doing so.  We are going to
>CONTINUE spreading the TRUTH about the dangerous cult known as
>Scientology to the world.  You CAN'T stop us.  You will NEVER stop us.
>
>NEVER.
 
    Take *that* to the bank.
    
            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
      dennis.l.erlich@support.com  +  inForm@primenet.com
                           "tar baby"