Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: AB REVIEW..FOR TOM K.
Message-ID: <9507281050.0F8IS00@support.com>
References: <jwithers-2707952154010001@sfsp98.slip.net>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 95 10:50:45 -0700
Lines: 78


rkeller@netaxs.com (Rod Keller)

Me:
>:     Therefore I'd say that there is a probability that she
>:     (Tumor) is on an undercover "mission".  Even if she isn't
>:     (which I stongly doubt) she has her own hidden agenda which
>:     she is following step-by-step by employing two-facedness
>:     (actually more) and subterfuge.  I'm afraid that the
>:     hyper-scrutiny of the Consensus Committee has revealed
>:     another ant in our sugarbowl.

Rod:
>We all have our own agendas.

    Some of us believe in something higher; truth.

>We are not circus elephants, trunk to tail,
>trunk to tail. Leave that act for the cos.

    I'll have to check with the ars Steering Committee on that.

>Just for the record, I believe Tom was set up by the cos, and I think OT
>sincerely believes he was not.

    Or wants *us* to believe that.

>:     Anyway.  Old Tumor, if she had any integrity, would step out
>:     and explain herself.  Right out here in the light.  And
>:     answer a few pointed questions.
>
>There are many reasons for not stepping out into the light. The
>Squirelle, Rogue Agent, Henry, Sliver, perhaps a half dozen more
>notables. Why is that so hard to understand?

    I'm not talking about giving up her anonymity, you know.  I'm
    talking about doing something more than spreading
    unsubstantiated inuendo about someone (Tom) who is standing 
    up for all our rights to free speech at considerable personal
    sacrifice and cost in pain.

    I just think the Tumor is waving for our attention with her
    point of view, hoping to defuse the Bloodybutt/Penet affair,
    and we aught to oblige her and look closely at why.

    Besides, I haven't been invited to her little tea parties.

    If she wanted to be straight, she could have e-mailed me her
    identity months ago and started a dialogue, secure in the
    knowledge that I am not an OSA agent.  She claims we were
    friends at Flag (or something).  So why can't she be
    straight?  She wants me to "handle" Tom for her.  It shows
    that she has scieno-think so ingrained into her mind as to
    presume that I am her "junior" and Tom is my "junior".  She's
    severly f*cked-up in the head.

    Maybe you've got too much of a personal relationship with the
    old broad from the "good old days of ars" to see it.  But to
    my view she's a double-dealer, a slip-slider, a cross-loader,
    and a hanger-up.  Besides that, I don't think she's being
    very straight with us on this improtant matter. She should 
    either shut up about it or step forward into the light with 
    her information.  Otherwise it's an even bet she will be 
    tracked down and subpoena'd.  It's da law.  If she know 
    something about a criminal act, she gotta tell.

    And if she's actually my old friend, she'll take this as
    pointed criticism and well-intentioned guidance.  
    
    A friend would.

            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
      dennis.l.erlich@support.com  +  inForm@primenet.com
                           "tar baby"