Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: AB REVIEW..FOR TOM K.
Message-ID: <9508022036.0SY5P01@support.com>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 95 20:36:24 -0700
Lines: 94


rogue@ccs.neu.edu (R Agent)

>>Don't get lost out there, Diane.

Me:
>    Don't worry about her, Rogue.  She's only asking questions
>    and pointing out things that don't make any sense.

Rogue:
>So am I.  Are the address book and Linda's sister dead ends?

    So it would seem.

>I can
>understand the address book; but Tom -spoke- with her sister, and she
>knew who she is.  She exists, and he has her phone number.  Why can't
>IRS or LAPD toddle over to where she lives and ask her some pointed
>questions about Linda's whereabouts?

    Why can't someone else look into it, you mean?  Fine, let's
    get *all* the information on the table, then we can all look
    into it.  I trust that the newsgroup as a whole can get to
    the bottom of it, if you, Rod, Tumor and Vega will put it on
    the table.

>    Remember, Tumor has never written anything publicly to
>    indicate that she is not in *full agreement* with the cult
>    and its management.
>
>I can't keep straight what's been told privately and what's been told
>publicly on this, but I don't think she makes any secret about being
>in complete opposition to church management.

    S'news to me.

>She wants to depose
>Miscavige and company and put in a bunch she thinks can run the place
>properly.

    I suppose that's what she's told you and her little circle of
    private suck-o-phants?

>>Tom's headed that way too, accusing Rod and now me of being secret OSA
>>plants.
>
>    Please quote this e-mail or posting so we can see what you're
>    talking about.
>
>It was more insinuated than outright stated.

    That's strange.  In the line above you state he's accusing
    you and Rod of being OSA.  Now it's just "insinuated"?

    Who's zoomin' whom here?

>He went on about how
>very peculiar it is that we want to know about what's being done on
>the case and that we don't think OT is necessarily an OSA operative.

    That's different than accusing you of being OSA, now isn't
    it?

>>But I'm not going to go out in that wilderness of mirrors to find out.
>
>    Sounds like you're gonna be very thorough then.
>
>Doin' my best.
>
>    Gonna seat-belt yourself into your big reclining chair to
>    do the investigation, Rod?
>
>Rogue, not Rod.  I'm just keeping my feet on the ground is all.

    Sorry.  But if it gets too complicated, you're gonna opt for
    the simple solution, eh Rogue?  Unfortunately one of the
    hallmarks of scieno OSA/GO operations is to make the story so
    complicated that even if it's sorted out, no one would
    believe it.  Why do you think it took Paulette 15 years and
    an FBI raid to clear her name?

    What's it gonna take Tom?

>    No offence.
>
>None taken.

    Kiss-kiss.

            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
      dennis.l.erlich@support.com  +  inForm@primenet.com
                           "tar baby"