Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com Subject: AB REVIEW..FOR TOM K. Message-ID: <9508022231.0VN6R02@support.com> Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150 X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35 Distribution: world Date: Wed, 02 Aug 95 22:31:31 -0700 Lines: 44 noring@netcom.com (Jon Noring) >wbarwell@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (William Barwell) writes: >Well, call the IRS, tell 'em you know somebody who knows who Ms. >Bloodybutt is and has her phone number and has talked to the >silly bitch and let 'em chase OT down. >I am sure the IRS investigators can get cooperation with the FBI to get >warrants to check ISP logs and trace her down fairly quickly. Jon: >I've been saying this all along that OT could be found very quickly by >anybody with a $500 bill to pay their local PI. For law enforcement, it >would be even more trivial as they can go in the front door of the ISP and >ask to see the real user information behind Doc Morgan, and, if necessary, >trace down the incoming telephone modem call. OT is a sitting duck for >having posted publicly all this time from CTS.com, a very public ISP in >San Diego. That's why I believe OSA knows who OT really is -- how could >they not know? (I'm of course curious to know the who/what/why of "Doc >Morgan" -- interesting name.) > >Now, if OT had been more careful and had posted via penet or a remailer, and >had been more judicious in giving out the little factoids about herself, then >it would be nearly impossible for her to be traced *this way*, even by OSA >(however, note that any one of her "inside contacts" could still be a double >agent for OSA, so no matter what, you are never totally sure that the >so-called inside info does not have the OSA stamp-of-approval on it, nor that >the inside contact may gather enough info to finger who OT really is.) > >OT shouldn't worry about OSA finding out who she really is since obviously >OSA already knows, or OSA *doesn't care*, and in either case, OSA must have >total control over the information she gets from her "inside sources" or else >they would have shut the flow of information to her down months ago. I >cannot come to any other conclusion. > >Jon Noring That's my take on it exactly. +--------------------------------------+ Rev. Dennis L Erlich * * the inFormer * * dennis.l.erlich@support.com + inForm@primenet.com "tar baby"