Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com Subject: AB Review..for Tom K. Message-ID: <9508042156.0UTLR00@support.com> Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150 X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35 Distribution: world Date: Fri, 04 Aug 95 21:56:25 -0700 Lines: 49 rkeller@netaxs.com (Rod Keller) >Not at the moment. I have been outraged in the past, though. Right now I'm >battling a version of sec-checking by the skeptics. That's what I >consider it: sec-checking. Showing your lack of direct knowledge. In sec-checking you (or the victim) would not be allowed to leave the room. Period. Your comparison is derived from a total lack of experience and is forwarded as a rhetorical deversion. >OT must reveal all she knows, or the sec-check >never stops. Well, I protest. Very dramatic. But it lacks the substance of having some b*tch rub blood all over your house and then get you arrested. Or having half a dozen of your enemies ransack your house and computer for seven hours. If Tumor knows something about these events, she needs to spit it out or slink away like the cowardly, back-stabing, double-dealing, rumor-monger she is. >: The old broad ducks further behind your defense and now Rogue. >: There has still been no disclosure of what she insinuated will >: damage Tom. It's an ugly little backstabbing game as far as >: I'm concerned. > >Do you agree with Diane that the only thing that matters is the phone >number? Of course not. That's only one piece of information. (probably dis-information) >If so, then it's all been resolved. What's all been resolved? How -AB- found Wollard? How and why Tumor got the number and contacted Wollard? How Ingram got the report into the Co$ computer? Why Co$ went after (or pretended to go after) -AB-? Where is -AB-? Who was he reporting to? Why Tumor doesn't want this all looked into? Nothing's been resolved. +--------------------------------------+ Rev. Dennis L Erlich * * the inFormer * * dennis.l.erlich@support.com + inForm@primenet.com "tar baby"