Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com Subject: AN OPEN LETTER Message-ID: <9508081529.0LRQP02@support.com> References: <432_9508070847@envision.co.uk> Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150 X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35 Distribution: world Date: Tue, 08 Aug 95 15:29:49 -0700 Lines: 91 rkeller@netaxs.com (Rod Keller) : >This sort of language is unlikely to get her to cooperate with you. Me: >: I don't know whether you can tell this after only a year of >: reading my posts, Rod, but my aim is not to convert slimos into >: human beings. Rod: >But you do want this person's cooperation. Not particularly. I wouldn't want to catch what Keith calls her "meme". >Or do you just want to curse her for a few more weeks? As in, like, voodoo spells or some other metaphysical thing? She asked for my help. It was a plea, really, to intervene and make Tom stop trying to get to the bottom of the Blood Incident. I heard the essence of her tormented cry for help and I'm trying to give her *proper* guidance. She should either come forward and porvide the information she has relating to the Blood Incident and back up her agenda, or admit what she did was to dead-agent Tom with innuendo and apologize for it. Z'at so much? You want me to ease off her lies? You want me to stop saying to her "put up or shut up"? Stop calling her Tumor? What? She has jumped on the bandwagon to smear Tom Klemesrud's good name at a time when it's pretty obvious to anyone who reads ars, that the Blood Affair, the Caltech PI operation, and the Finnish Penet (ration) Raid were all related to the scieno Orifice of Special Affairs (and Drive-thru Litigation Service[tm]). Me: >: Old Timer is a two-faced, back-stabbing liar and a coward. I meant the good kind. >: She is helping OSA and poodleboy. I'm just pointing it out. Rod: >She is not. Your opinion. >Your reasoning is faulty, 1) OSA is working to undermine Tom Klemesrud's credibility. 2) Tumor threatened to reveal stuff about Tom which would *further* hurt his credibility. Hence ... 3) Tumor helped OSA undermine Tom's credibility. >your evidence non-existant, Her own statements in the threatening post are the evidence. >and your >ability to judge people is flawed. I dunno. I'll stick with my own opinions, unless there is better reason than you have given me, to doubt them, thank you. You trust her. You defend her actions. You don't want her to be under any pressure to back up or explain her threats to discredit Tom further. Fine. Your behavior is becoming predictible and your arguments have already become increasiningly both rhetorical and strident. You want the subject dropped. I'll have to check. >Rod Keller / rkeller@netaxs.com +--------------------------------------+ Rev. Dennis L Erlich * * the inFormer * * dennis.l.erlich@support.com + inForm@primenet.com "tar baby"