Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com Subject: AB REVIEW..FOR TOM K. Message-ID: <9508102124.0U2UF02@support.com> References: <409jus$acp@comet.magicnet.net> Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150 X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35 Distribution: world Date: Thu, 10 Aug 95 21:24:40 -0700 Lines: 58 rogue@ccs.neu.edu (R Agent) >>>Someone was suggesting that the whole caltech incident was staged just >>>to add credibility to OT. I'm glad you aren't following in that >>>delusion. > >Diane: >>I don't know who the "someone" you're referring to is, Rogue, but >>it certainly wasn't me. > >Rogue: >>It was Dennis or Tom, or maybe both. Me: > Oooo, you rogue. You're playin' it fast and loose with the > truth. You know damn well I never suggested this. I even > corrected you on this once and yet you keep asserting it. > > Why the disinformation? Rogue: >Sorry. You did not say that you thought Caltech was staged to add >credibility to OT. You said you thought Caltech was staged to distance >-AB- from the church, giving him a shore story. I said it *coulda been*. Keep it straight or quote me. I'm beginning to think you're misstating things I wrote on prupose. >Do I have it right this time? Try getting it right *before* you repeat inaccuracies. >>Feel free to point out where I'm wrong. > > You're wrong for even suggesting the above the first time, > let alone after being corrected on it. > >It's like JFK. I'm having a hard time keeping my conspiracies straight. > > RA That's the trouble with not having all the truth. You just have to eliminate what isn't possible and work with what is. It is not possible that Tumor is being straight with this newsgroup. And she, instead of answering up herself, has deputized you and Rod to defend her honor. To me, it's a disgusting spectacle. But typical of most OSA operations. +--------------------------------------+ Rev. Dennis L Erlich * * the inFormer * * dennis.l.erlich@support.com + inForm@primenet.com "tar baby"