Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: AB REVIEW..FOR TOM K.
Message-ID: <9508102124.0U2UL02@support.com>
References: <409jus$acp@comet.magicnet.net>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 95 21:24:40 -0700
Lines: 55


lippard@Primenet.Com (James J. Lippard)

>rogue@ccs.neu.edu (R Agent) wrote:
>>There's been a major campaign of crying out

        * that she didn't give the number to anybody, *
                    * that it was a bluff. *

>>Is any member of that campaign
>>(you know who you are) going to admit they were wrong?

Diane:
>What "major campaign," Rogue?  I have no idea what you're talking
>about here.

Jim:
>I don't know that this counts as a "major campaign," but here are three
>excerpts from Aug. 2 postings to a.r.s regarding this:
>
>#1:
>   I believe so as well.  I just hope that Old Timer's friends don't
>   continue the masquerade by "pretending" to investigate secretly
>   in the hopes of getting this entire series of incidents out of
>   public scrutiny and back into the realm of whispered secrets and
>   hidden motives.  NO ONE but the CoS will benefit from keeping
>   this information hidden.
>
>#2:
>   Old Timer's behavior is disingenuous, though. Like someone promising
>   not to come in your mouth, they may think they have control but don't.
>   That's why you make *noise* during interesting activities, to let
>   people know what's going on. I can't imagine a good reason to keep the
>   "investigator's" name secret, *except* to assuage our concerns and
>   keep us quiet while rumors build up and the truth (or evidence) fades.
>
>#3:
>   Uh-huh? Who would this be? Gene Ingram perhaps? And would you mind
>   telling us where you got the phone number in the first place? And
>   _why_ it was given to you?

    Jim, excuse me, but I don't see that any of your quotes
    addresses the issue that Rogue was asserting: a major
    campaign crying out ...

         * that she didn't give the number to anybody, *
                    * that it was a bluff. *

    Where is this in the above 3 statements?
    
            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
      dennis.l.erlich@support.com  +  inForm@primenet.com
                           "tar baby"