Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com Subject: AN OPEN LETTER Message-ID: <9508111610.0MQA402@support.com> References: <40g4so$h9i@pppmail.nyser.net> Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150 X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35 Distribution: world Date: Fri, 11 Aug 95 16:10:47 -0700 Lines: 103 rkeller@netaxs.com (Rod Keller) >: You want me to ease off her lies? You want me to stop saying >: to her "put up or shut up"? Stop calling her Tumor? What? > >Stop calling her Tumor. That's a good start. OK, how about "that lying old bag"? >: She has jumped on the bandwagon to smear Tom Klemesrud's good >: name at a time when it's pretty obvious to anyone who reads >: ars, that the Blood Affair, the Caltech PI operation, and the >: Finnish Penet (ration) Raid were all related to the scieno >: Orifice of Special Affairs (and Drive-thru Litigation >: Service[tm]). > >She has some mistaken conclusions about the whole deal. No. She mistakenly threatened to expose some damaging material about Tom. That's called blackmail. >As does Tom, as >do you, and I probably have some as well. What's your point? You're >supposed to have the pointed questions. My point is that she is possibly conspiring with OSA. : >: Old Timer is a two-faced, back-stabbing liar and a coward. >: I meant the good kind. > >I like joking and degrading as much as the next guy, but please don't tell >me the next time you think I'm not taking things as seriously as I should. Hey, I'm trying to sugar-coat it. But I think she's an agent of the cult. Judging from years of cheek-to-jowl contact with the OSA scum, I can tell by the psychic pstench as well as the underhanded, cowardly methods. I don't expect you to notice. Afterall "the lying old bag's" threatening Tom was so subtle you probably just mist it. : >: She is helping OSA and poodleboy. I'm just pointing it out. : >She is not. >: Your opinion. >Sure, just as it's your opinion that she is. So you say. : >Your reasoning is faulty, >: 1) OSA is working to undermine Tom Klemesrud's credibility. > >She is not. My opinion. > >: 2) Tumor threatened to reveal stuff about Tom which would >: *further* hurt his credibility. > >Please bring this new evidence out in the light. You've stopped making sense again, Rod. : >your evidence non-existant, >: Her own statements in the threatening post are the evidence. > >I haven't seen this new threatening post. My newsfeed is slow, perhaps >somebody will repost it? It was posted weeks ago and in it "the lying old bag" begged me to get Tom in line before he does more damage to his credibility. You saw it. Everybody did. : >and your : >ability to judge people is flawed. >: I dunno. I'll stick with my own opinions, unless there is >: better reason than you have given me, to doubt them, thank >: you. >: >: You trust her. You defend her actions. You don't want >: her to be under any pressure to back up or explain her threats >: to discredit Tom further. Fine. > >I don't trust her. I defend her right to come forward or not, according >to her own morals. I haven't seen any threats. I tol you it was too subtle. >: Your behavior is becoming predictible and your arguments have >: already become increasiningly both rhetorical and strident. > >Yes, this thread has been going in a circle for a while now. I'll keep it >going until the threats of legal harassment stop. Once more around, then. You're being threatened, Rod? Or are you referring to getting "that lying old bag" to testify about what she claimed to know about the Blood Attack/-AB-/Penet Raid? Suggesting in public that she be called upon to stand behind her public statements is legal harassment, Rod? How so? +--------------------------------------+ Rev. Dennis L Erlich * * the inFormer * * dennis.l.erlich@support.com + inForm@primenet.com "tar baby"