Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: POOL FOR GRADY-RAID
Message-ID: <9508210840.0C72E00@support.com>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 95 08:40:53 -0700
Lines: 84


m-6129@mailbox.swip.net (WebWalker)

davidson@sfsu.edu (Daniel Davidson) wrote:
:>Grady is on the verge of being invaded, and all you people
:>can do is set up a pool scheduale for him? Very sad...

    A testement to our crumbling civilization, Daniel.  Greed
    promotes gambling to generate profit from another's misery.

    We are most certainly in the End o' Times.

WW:
>Everyone seems convinced that Grady is next to be raided. Somehow I
>don't believe that he *will* be raided.

    Grady has challanged them to try.  The scienos are gonna get
    their d*cks in a wringer if they do.

>Those two that have been
>raided sofar, Erlich and Lerma, were both former $cientologists who
>had signed documents where they guaranteed never to reveal any $cieno
>documents.

    'Skuse me, are you familiar with the phrase "full of shit"?
    Get your faqs straight if you intend to use the given name
    of "that person[tm]" in public.

    I never signed, nor would I, any document which would prevent
    me from revealing the details of a fraud being perpetrated on
    the public.  I have never violated a contract with the scum
    who are suing me.  Any documents I did actually sign while 
    under the control of the cult were coerced from be using 
    thought reform such as the RPF.
    
    I haven't violated the contracts I didn't sign.  And I don't 
    even have a dog.

    As far as Arnie, you'd have to ask him, but I don't believe
    his answer would be much different.

    You'd do well to get your facts straight about these matters
    before you get accused of purposely spreading disinformation,
    WebPerson.

>AFAIK Grady Ward isn't a former $cieno (please correct me
>if I'm wrong!). My guess is that HKK/CoS used those signed documents
>when tricking the federal judges to issue the proper warrants for the
>raids, NOT simply accusations regarding copyright infringement or the
>like.

    You don't have to guess (you are wrong in my case, BTW), you
    can look at the filings in the EFF web page or Newman's.

>So the reasons why I don't think Grady Ward will be raided are these:
>
>1. He hasn't signed any non-disclosure documents
>
>2. He's prepared for them, and they know it
>
>3. The media is showing too much interest in the raids and Co$
>
>I think that the next we will see from Co$ is something along the
>lines of a full frontal assault, not minor skirmishes like the raids.
>Something along the lines of what was outlined in the Capricorn
>document.....

    Crizwell predicts.

>BTW I don't know who "Anonymous" is, and I don't want to know, but
>whoever he/she/it is: Keep up the good work and may whatever God *you*
>might have bless you....

    Your use of the capitalize diety is also in error.

>WebWalker

    Hope this helps. (this is *not* a flaming)

            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
      dennis.l.erlich@support.com  +  inForm@primenet.com
                           "tar baby"