Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com Subject: POOL FOR GRADY-RAID Message-ID: <9508261809.0PI5L02@support.com> References: <199508261838.LAA21868@netcomsv.netcom.com> Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150 X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35 Distribution: world Date: Sat, 26 Aug 95 18:09:17 -0700 Lines: 42 rogue@ccs.neu.edu (R Agent) >dennis.l.erlich@support.com writes: > You still think you know more than me about what I signed and > what I didn't sign? You are pretty damn cheeky. Read my > deposition on the EFF web page if you want the facts. >Carl Kaun wrote: >you're right, it's cheeky. the exercise of putting yourself in >another's shoes is useful, but not a sole basis for a course of action. > >still, cooley did drag out something purported to have your signature >in the june 23 hearing, and i didn't hear denials then. if you can >answer (considering that the case is active), are you now stating that >that document was bogus? that would be pretty significant! Rogue: >He did not specifically state that the document was a forgery during >the hearing, that I can tell. But he has stated it on here, many >times. And I suspect that he does state it as a part of the papers >filed at the time of the hearing. > >i'd *love* to read your deposition; i've looked for it for months and >haven't seen it. i've looked on the EFF web page and don't recognize >it if it's there. can you give a title or more specific URL that would >enable me to locate it? i'd appreciate if you'd email me this as well, >as our newsfeed only keeps a day or two of traffic, and i am sometimes >away long enough that i miss things. > >http://www.cybercom.net/~rnewman/scientology/hearing-6.23/transcript This is the transcript of the *hearing*, I believe. And not the transcript of my deposition. But I could be mistaken. > RA +--------------------------------------+ Rev. Dennis L Erlich * * the inFormer * * dennis.l.erlich@support.com + inForm@primenet.com "tar baby"