Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: QUESTIONS ABOUT BOULD
Message-ID: <9508311834.0Q3NX02@support.com>
References: <115329Z31081995@anon.penet.fi>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 95 18:34:48 -0700
Lines: 40


gazit@lear.cs.duke.edu (Hillel)

>##Also if, as seems reasonable to assume, Wollersheim helped Erlich
>##by data or advice then the (ex)confidential legal information can
>##give the Co$ a good picture of what the opponent is planning.

Me:
>    I'm right here.  You don't have to guess.  Your "reasonable
>    assumption" above is neither reasonable nor true.

Hillel:
>The Co$ does not work by "the truth," it works by what it considered
>to be the truth.  (And yes, there is a big difference between the two.)

    <pretending not to notice the obvious condescension above>

    Well yes, I think I may have a fair grasp of that concept.

    So you were being Devil's Advocate?  When you say "reasonable
    to assume", above, you meant "reasonable for any brain-dead
    scieno to assume"?

>IMO the Co$ tries to get some confidential information about you
>and your defense, and that's why your name is one of the key words
>in the search of Wollersheim's files.

    My whole defense is in writing and filed.  The scienos have a
    copy.  There's no mystery about that.

    They are, as our Mystery Agent with the Ludlum novel name
    sez, looking for anything to prove a conspiracy.

    Phatt Phucking Chance!

            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
      dennis.l.erlich@support.com  +  inForm@primenet.com
                           "tar baby"