Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: THE SCAM THAT IS FACT
Message-ID: <9509070858.0CLIS00@support.com>
References: <n9s6mDEIp23.4xG@netcom.com>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 95 08:58:03 -0700
Lines: 82


smokesig@ix.netcom.com (Neal Hamel)

>milne@crl.com (Andrew Milne) wrote:
>     It's time for a report of the truth about Factnet.

Neal:
>Yah, right!
>
>Listen up.  Are you trying to look stupid?  You post this
>crap in front of untold numbers of readers of this newsgroup
>and your posts gets shown to be a pack of lies almost
>immediately.  Every damn time.
>
>Don't you see that you are posting in context of a bunch of
>information that completely puts the lie to your assertions?
>This isn't a talkshow that you can sort of control for an
>hour and walk away.  (And, by the way, "this ain't no party,
>this ain't no disco, this ain't not foolin' around")
>
>You *never* respond when your lies are exposed.  I assume
>when readers of a.r.s. see that, they conclude that you were
>in fact lying.  And you know, from all indications they are
>right.
>
>Did it ever occur to you that the reason that Larry W. is so
>pissed off at you is because he was the victim of Fair
>Game[tm] actions against him by your cult?  Did it ever
>further occur to you that the reason he is even more pissed
>off at you is because he won a court case resulting from the
>Fair Game[tm] actions against him and you won't pay him what
>he fairly and legally won?
>
>Did it ever occur to you and your handlers that you will
>have no credibility here (and I imagine everywhere else)
>regarding the matter of Larry W. until you address the
>issues of the lawsuit he won against you?  It makes you and
>your cult look stupidly dishonest.  I suspect that it makes
>you look stupidly dishonest because you really are stupidly
>dishonest.
>
>Anytime anyone here with half a brain starts reading one of
>your half-baked rants about Larry W., the only thought is,
>"The stupid assholes owe Larry 4.5 million dollars, what do
>you expect Milne to do?"
>
>One of your problems is that most people here appear to have
>considerably more than half a brain. Another problem you
>have is that the whole world is beginning to understand that
>if a scientologist is talking, lies are being told.  I think
>this will end up being a big problem for you.
>
>I have been secretly doing a Data Series[tm] analysis and
>Why Finding[tm] on your problems about lying. I've been
>pulling strings and finding the outpoints. Here is
>scientology's Why[tm]: "Hubbard was a liar and you are
>copying him".  If you e-mail me, I will give you a personal
>Why[tm].
>
>There is one thing that Hubbard did say I concur with,
>"Scientology is too incredible to be believed."  Exactly.
              
    This quote ought to be the screen saver for anyone looking 
    into cult.  Pinch yourself and repeat:  This is not a test.
    These people are for real.

    Now about your writing ...

    When I'm senior editor of a huge, prestigeous publication,
    I'm gonna hire you to write, Neal.

    You're great.  On the level of Bob Lobsinger.  Another of my
    favorites.

    How much of an introduction have you given yourself.  Do
    arsers know who you were?

            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
      dennis.l.erlich@support.com  +  inForm@primenet.com
                           "tar baby"