Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com Subject: DID HUBBARD ADMIT TO LAZI Message-ID: <9509091154.0GQIQ00@support.com> References: <42qtth$gjt@lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk> Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150 X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35 Distribution: world Date: Sat, 09 Sep 95 11:54:49 -0700 Lines: 52 anon-remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl (Anonymous) >The following material occurs in the OT 3 documents which are available >on the net: > >List of Volcanos > >Asia and Pacific [snipt to save MoFo some work] >Kolomonjero > >(Spelling not guaranteed) >(List may be incomplete) > >The above material, including the two parenthetical comments, is allegedly >the writing of L. Ron Hubbard. No, BL. It was *in fact* written by the Phattman. In the OatTea3 Pack this material is in Rotundo's own hand. I saw it. >However, L. Ron Hubbard is the very person who discovered that the only >obstacle to learning is that people are too lazy to look up unfamiliar >words in a dictionary. Here, he is alleged to have written "Spelling >not guaranteed". Was L. Ron Hubbard actually admitting he was too lazy >to look up these names in a dictionary or atlas? Or was this, in fact, >written by someone else? No, Phatso wrote it hisself. >Furthermore, students of Scientology are explicity forbidden to question >the infallibility of L. Ron Hubbard's writings. However, here he is >alleged to have written "List may be incomplete". This is to say, he did not >know whether or not his list was complete (it doesn't appear to be accurate, >the Himalayas not being volcanic, but that's another issue). > >Responsible Scientology officials ought to clarify at once whether this >admission of laziness and ignorance does or does not appear on the authentic >OT writings of L. Ron Hubbard. > > --The Bottom Line It's totally authentic. +--------------------------------------+ Rev. Dennis L Erlich * * the inFormer * * dennis.l.erlich@support.com + inForm@primenet.com "tar baby"