Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com Subject: DENMARK RAID DOCUMENT Message-ID: <9509111105.0FL5I01@support.com> References: Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150 X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35 Distribution: world Date: Mon, 11 Sep 95 11:05:44 -0700 Lines: 56 ao579@yfn.ysu.edu (Diane Richardson) >Tony Sidaway writes: >IF they came from Britain (unlikely since the same documents were openly >available from an LA courtroom) they are most likely to be from the copy >documents which were ordered to be returned to Scott and Lawley in this >ruling in March last year. Scott and Lawley would have had full legal >possession of these copies, but any trade secrets and copyright laws >would still apply to any acts of copying or distribution Scott and >Lawley might have intended to indulge in. > > I don't really know enough to comment upon this > intelligently, but I think I've noticed a discrepancy. > > The newspaper accounts call the stolen documents > the *New* Operating Thetan Materials. > > Don't I remember Dennis commenting that what Arnie > posted were the *Old* OT materials, before they > were juggled around and re-released? Exactly so, Diane. The materials in Fishman were the old Oat Tea levels. They have since been recycled. Oat Tea 4-7 are now the NOTs materials (more exorcism of body thetans and culusters). The old 4-7 have been moved up the chart to 9-12. > If that's the case, the materials contained in the > Fishman Declaration which Arnie posted couldn't > *possibly* have come from Scott and Lawley, which > is apparently what the "Church" is claiming. Silly little clams. > Hey, Andy!!!! When you talk about the materials > Arnie posted being *stolen*, who *stole* them? > When? Where? How? By whom? Or are you just > assuming that "Church" security is so tight > and so foolproof that everyone should automatically > assume any copies of the advanced materials not > in "Church" hands are stolen? They know that they will never have to back up their lies. > Do you think you can get a judge and jury to believe > that? Good luck. > >Diane Richardson >referen@ibm.net +--------------------------------------+ Rev. Dennis L Erlich * * the inFormer * * dennis.l.erlich@support.com + inForm@primenet.com "tar baby"