Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com Subject: COPYRIGHT AND TRAD Message-ID: <9509150820.0BPPO00@support.com> References: <091354Z15091995@anon.penet.fi> Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150 X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35 Distribution: world Date: Fri, 15 Sep 95 08:20:18 -0700 Lines: 42 One Reader chides: >I think Andrew's contributions to this forum are valuable >and I don't understand why you are dissing him. So do I. Why I am dissing him is that he is characterizing those of us who stood up against the cult, as criminals and scofflaws. He is attempting to steer the issue in such a way as to stake out the most ground for his clients, the current owners of IPs. I consider him like a person at the opposite end of "my party". Besides, I don't thik I need him telling me in public how or what I should post to ars. It just pisses me off. He assumes he represents the highground. I dispute that because of his vested interest in the outcome of these issues in the court. I want to see the maximum ground gained for the common man with these issues regarding internet in the courts. I want to see the quasi-legal, fascist power of the current copyright law defanged once and for all, in favor of the rights of the individual on intenet. If you think I'm gonna let this Andrew lecture to all us endlessly, without jumping on his tendency to spin things to the favor of future business for him (and that's what he's maybe doing here - spamming for business) you have seriously misjudged me. I respect your opinion and will note it as time goes on. I respect people to the degree they respect me. If you call me a lawbreaking criminal, I will be right there, in your face, to be similarly rude to you. And how come you and Kaplan left me hanging with that stupid Espee of the Month Contest? +--------------------------------------+ Rev. Dennis L Erlich * * the inFormer * * dennis.l.erlich@support.com + inForm@primenet.com "tar baby"