Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: THE NON-SCANDAL OF AN
Message-ID: <9509190818.0BO7H00@support.com>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 95 08:18:31 -0700
Lines: 64


Bob Woodhead:

>>Finally, before you flame him, consider that he is giving the group the
>>benefit of his legal education for free; those hours come out of time
>>he could otherwise spend with his family.
>    If it's such a sacrifice that he's neglecting his children, I
>    think we can do without his pontification for a while.  After
>    all, he's not getting paid to post here ... or is he?
>He's close to giving up.  Your loss.

    Like I care.  So far he has not contributed anything but
    pomposity, demand for decorum, and reasons to give up rights.
    I know you two are gonna have some halfast Farewell Cruel Ars
    post like we've seen so many times before from such notables
    as Jackfarmer and Jet.  I call it doing a nixon.

           "You won't have me to kick around any more."

    If you want to leave.  Go on ahead.  Somehow we'll manage.
    If you want to stay.  I'm not gonna stop you.

    But I might pull you over and check to see if your "papers
    are in order". :)

>    Are you in advertising or PR perhaps?  Are you in any other
>    businesses with Andrew?
>I run a company that subtitles, dubs, and releases Japanese Animation in
>the USA.  I am Andy's client in some IP matters.  I'm a longtime friend
>of his.  I'm not being paid by anyone for spending time posting on a.r.s,
>nor do I have any connection with the CO$, other than that one meeting
>described above.

    Tell us about that meeting.

>    Who are some of Andrew's other clients?  Has he tried any
>    important cases we might have heard of?  Could he post a
>    sample of some of the filings he's made where he defended
>    someone's free-speech or someone's intellectual property
>    against free-speech?
>
>I'll let Andy speak for himself in this regard.

    Smart.

>PS: lest you still think I am an agent of the CO$,

    I have not said that nor do I believe that is true.  I've
    just noted coincidences.

>I suggest you reread
>the above, and also Andy's notes, and ask yourself: could a CO$ member
>be at least as marginally eloquent as I have been, or as gracious in
>response to the flamage as Andy has?

    He and you have "politely" said f*ck you to me lots of times.

    And I've seen it done better.

            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
      dennis.l.erlich@support.com  +  inForm@primenet.com
                           "tar baby"