Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: PRISCILLA COATES,DIAN
Message-ID: <9509222042.0T3AT03@support.com>
References: <221307Z22091995@anon.penet.fi>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 95 20:42:30 -0700
Lines: 74


referen@ibm.net (Diane Richardson)

>atesta@carbon.concom.com (A Testa) wrote:
>That Person<tm>  busted Standup's chops with the following:
>
>>                         CRAMMING ORDER
>>                         --------------
>>
>>    Standup posted an Off-line Auditing question asking if a
>>withhold had been missed to two individuals posting in a public
>>newsgroup which, without any ability to pull it, would *again*
>>miss withholds on the wogs and send them deeper into the
>>dramatization of the Overt/Motivator Sequence and Cycle of an
>>M/U.

Andy:
>VERY interesting stuff Dennis.  Interesting in that such a simple
>question: "Was a withhold missed?" could have such dire consequences.
>One would have to ask:  If such a thing were done on purpose, that is,
>if Standup new the above consequences of asking that question, would that
>not constitute reverse processing?  So called "black" scientology?
     
    Precisely what Standup's doing.

>So are we witness to an attempt to reverse process Diane and Priscilla?
                                   
    Yup.  Right here on ars.

>And, more importantly, do they actually believe it would work on an
>untrained (non-brainwashed) wog?  
 
    Toadly.  The missed withhold tek is universal.  It stems from
    the cycle of a misunderstood word and predates persistence.

>Milne told us a while back that scientology
>wouldn't work on you if you didn't believe it.  We had a good laugh, but
>it seems that it would HAVE to work on everybody regardlesof belief for it
>really be a "technology".  So does Standup really think she's going to harm
>anyone by doing this?
                                                           
    Harm or enturbulate someone by missing their withholds and
    causing them to leave.  Yes.  That's what he's doing.
                                                         
Diane:
>No, Mrs. Hornnes is just desperately trying to engage either of
>us (Priscilla or myself) in a heated debate in the hopes that
>we'll reveal what we know about her.
      
    That too.  You see, Diane, you've missed *her* withhold, so 
    she's got to react as Tubby told her.

>Mrs. Hornnes is very worried that she's in deep trouble for her
>STANDUP posts libeling CAN.  She's trying to get information from
>us that she can use to fend off any legal consequences of her
>actions.  She would like to find out what we know about her and
>her associates.  She knows the "Church" <spit> will disavow any
>knowledge of her activities and leave her hanging in the wind.
>She's scared.
                                         
    Classic missed withhold phenomena she's dramatizing.

>AFAIC, Mrs. Hornnes is a fool.
                                                        
    I'll say.

>Diane Richardson
>referen@ibm.net
 
            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
      dennis.l.erlich@support.com  +  inForm@primenet.com
                           "tar baby"