Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: PRISCILLA COATES,DIAN
Message-ID: <9509251543.0M3CR01@support.com>
References: <445o1q$lgo@ds2.acs.ucalgary.ca>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 95 15:43:35 -0700
Lines: 76


testa@carbon.concom.com (A Testa)

>That Person<tm> responds to my post:
 
    I love it when you call me that.
                                    
Andy:
>>And, more importantly, do they actually believe it would work on an
>>untrained (non-brainwashed) wog?
     
Me:
>    Toadly.  The missed withhold tek is universal.  It stems from
>    the cycle of a misunderstood word and predates persistence.
>
>>really be a "technology".  So does Standup really think she's going to harm
>>anyone by doing this?
>
>    Harm or enturbulate someone by missing their withholds and
>    causing them to leave.  Yes.  That's what he's doing.
>
>So, what happens to Standup, or any of them, when their reverse processing
>fails?  

    They either ignore the fact that it has no effect on us or 
    imagine that it is working on us subliminally.

>They've been doing it for months now, and they haven't caused
>anyone to leave due to restimulation.  Sure, they can rile people up and
>start bickering, but you don't need to postulate engrams, BTs, or Invader
>Forces to understand that.  So, if they try reverse processing to make us
>leave, and we don't leave, what does that say?

    It says that they need another session because their postulates 
    are not working right.  Our Espee "entheta" is overwhelming their 
    "theta."  <ie our badness is badder than their goodness>

>Let me guess.  Don't tell me.

    Too late.

>Since the tech is always right, and the tech says "do X, and Y occurs",
>they will do X expecting Y.  If Y doesn't occur, then they must have done
>X wrong, since doing X ALWAYS results in Y.  So they probably wind up in
>a heap of trouble for being out-ethics after their I/C gets a load of
>poodle saliva sprayed on his chest during a status meeting with Miscarriage.

    That'd be it.  Only it's sprayed about at their waist level.

>They then come back, do X again with REAL intention, and again Y doesn't
>happen.  More poodle spit, less sleep.  Am I close?

    Dead-on.

>Is it possible they
>would ever catch a gleam that Y doesn't occur because the tech is a
>fraud?

    It not a thinkable thought for them.

>I thought not.
>
>OK OSA, keep that reverse processing coming.  I'm sure I can take it
>for FAR longer than you can dish it out.
>
>And thanks, Dennis and Diane, for the replies.

    All part of the service.

>Andy "Xenu dances on Ron's urn" Testa

            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
      dennis.l.erlich@support.com  +  inForm@primenet.com
                           "tar baby"