Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com Subject: [B35] Psychoceramics: The Message-ID: <9509271734.0OOUB02@support.com> References: Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150 X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35 Distribution: world Date: Wed, 27 Sep 95 17:34:30 -0700 Lines: 46 an221181@anon.penet.fi (Beebo Brinker) >I am not a Scientologist or a Satanist. My question is for those >who understand the litigation policy of the COS as it >pertains to the Cult Awareness Network. > >Can anyone explain why the Church of Scientology characterizes >itself on the one hand as a legitimate mainstream religion, and on >the other hand spends so much time and money harrassing the >Cult Awareness Network? > >CAN, according to some skeptical material I have >recently received, advises us all that there are BABY-EATING >DEVIL WORSHIPPERS where you would LEAST SUSPECT >THEM, that want to infiltrate our SCHOOLS AND DAYCARE CENTERS >to teach our precious innocent children about EVOLUTION and force >them to play their heavy metal records BACKWARDS to hear >SECRET MESSAGES about SECULAR HUMANISM and PREMARITAL SEX >and maybe even SELL DRUGS ferchrissakes, and not only that, >the've been doing it completely undetected for GENERATIONS >without ever leaving a single shred of evidence, not even one >baby bone!!!! > >And the Church of Scientology is worried about damage to its >reputation from these people??? > >Beebo Brinker, SP2 Beebo, you have seriously gone over the line here. CAN advises none of the things you've said above. Quote their material where it says so, or shut back up. CAN and AFF (American Family Foundation) are just about the only American organizations to stand up and denounce the criminal practices of the scienos. That is why CAN has been sued by the scienos so many times (43). They deserve our support. Get it right. +--------------------------------------+ Rev. Dennis L Erlich * * the inFormer * * dennis.l.erlich@support.com + inForm@primenet.com "tar baby"