Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com Subject: CRITICS BICKERING AMO Message-ID: <9509290915.0D0EM01@support.com> Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150 X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35 Distribution: world Date: Fri, 29 Sep 95 09:15:42 -0700 Lines: 36 Bill Hudson Me to Woodhead: > There is no 'anti side'. It is *my* battle. I was engaged > in it long before I had your support, and I will continue > fighting the cult now that I have lost it. Bill: >They just don't get it, do they?. A free exchange of ideas and opinions can >sometimes be acrimonious. If the critics of Scientology sometimes disagree and >argue, that's our right. I view it as much healthier than the Orwellian >mentality that most Scientologists are stuck in. That's the way I see it, too. When we can't disagree with each other, we are subject to tyranny. How we express our disagreement is a personal right, as long as no one else is injured. >In fact, I highly reccomend George Orwell's "1984" to any and all >Scientologists. This is what the world will look like if your so-called church >ever takes over. God forbid. Even when I was still under the ether I realized that I would not want to live in a world where the C-org was in charge. >Bill Hudson; Systems Administrator; Robert Mann Packaging, Inc. >bill@rmp.com >http://www.rmp.com/rmp/ +--------------------------------------+ Rev. Dennis L Erlich * * the inFormer * * dennis.l.erlich@support.com + inForm@primenet.com "tar baby"