Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: CRITICS BICKERING AMO
Message-ID: <9509290915.0D0EM01@support.com>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 95 09:15:42 -0700
Lines: 36


Bill Hudson <bill@rmp.com>

Me to Woodhead:
>    There is no 'anti side'.  It is *my* battle.  I was engaged
>    in it long before I had your support, and I will continue
>    fighting the cult now that I have lost it.
      
Bill:
>They just don't get it, do they?.  A free exchange of ideas and opinions can
>sometimes be acrimonious.  If the critics of Scientology sometimes disagree and
>argue, that's our right.  I view it as much healthier than the Orwellian
>mentality that most Scientologists are stuck in.

    That's the way I see it, too.  When we can't disagree with 
    each other, we are subject to tyranny.  How we express our 
    disagreement is a personal right, as long as no one else is 
    injured.

>In fact, I highly reccomend George Orwell's "1984" to any and all
>Scientologists.  This is what the world will look like if your so-called church
>ever takes over.
            
    God forbid.  Even when I was still under the ether I realized
    that I would not want to live in a world where the C-org was 
    in charge.

>Bill Hudson; Systems Administrator; Robert Mann Packaging, Inc.
>bill@rmp.com
>http://www.rmp.com/rmp/
 
            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
      dennis.l.erlich@support.com  +  inForm@primenet.com
                           "tar baby"