Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: MORE QUESTIONS
Message-ID: <9509300909.0CUUL00@support.com>
References: <003337Z30091995@anon.penet.fi>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 95 09:09:07 -0700
Lines: 84


brad@bear.ras.ucalgary.ca ( Brad Wallace )

>Tim Schmitt <tims@next.ocsg.com>
>>  1) What is difference between cancel bunny, cancel poodle, and the
>>canel moose?
>
>    The cancelpoodle (sometimes called cancelbunny because it
>    keeps going) is part of the scieno OSA operation to stifle
>    criticism by cancelling posts critical of the kult, that quote
>    their Saykrid Droppings or point to the Droppings.
>    Universally detested on the net.
>
>    Cancelmoose is a benevolent canceller who cleans up spam with
>    the tacit approval of good netizens everywhere.

Brad:
>Uhh... Point of clarification: The Cancelbunny cancels on the
>basis of *content*. The Cancelmoose cancels on the basis
>of volume of groups posted to (to be exact, it attempts
>to cancel "spam" postings to the 'net, where some clueless
>twit posts the same message to every group it can). The
>distinction is important, it's censorship vs. keeping the
>UseNet useful.
>
>[*snip*]
>
>    If you want I'll post the Occult Mouth - Speaking in Foot
>    story again.
>
>Please do. 
 
    I'll repost it today through my Primenet account.

>Does a transcript exist on the Web anywhere?

    Not the full one.  The scienos stole it during the raid and
    have not returned it.

>>  Given the beating Scientology is taking on the net, I imagine
>>they have a high desire to nuetralize the net.  Are you
>>aware of any stories or conversations in which members of
>>OSA express great need to nuke the net?
>
>    Wonderuss said he'd shut down the newsgroup in a short time
>    <over 7 months ago>.  He also tried to get the scienos to
>    flood the newsgroup with "Big Wins" and make it unreadable.
>    Ho, ho, Helena tried to remove the newsgroup back in February.
>
>    Do those count?
>
>A quick point here. The Co$ does not appear to be winning the
>'Net war, but over on AOL they've pretty much wrapped up victory.
>Anybody who wishes to question the party line in any of the
>$cientology-related folders over there are told to shut and/or
>get out (and have their messages cancelled). Does nothing to
>enhance my regard for AOL.
>
>[*snip*]
>
>>  9) Do they OT9 and OT10 material exists?  Has anybody read them?
>
>    The old Oat Tea 4 & 5 are now OT 9 & 10.
>
>Which skips the question - are there levels above the OTVIII level
>as posted in the Fishman affidavit? 
 
    If I understand your question, the answer is yes.  Fishman OT
    4-7 are now OT 9-12.

>I don't care what they've numbered them,
>but are there levels above the "Jesus was a Pedophile" one?
                        
    Yes.

>Keep up both the good questions and answers.
 
    Yea, it's fun.
    
            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
      dennis.l.erlich@support.com  +  inForm@primenet.com
                           "tar baby"