Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: IN DEFENSE OF AOL
Message-ID: <9510040851.0CFPD00@support.com>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 95 08:51:09 -0700
Lines: 78


otpilot@aol.com (OTPILOT)

>Diane
>
>I stand by my original post. My primary purpose was to make known the
>framework within which AOL operates and point out that it is very unlikely
>that they are in collusion with the C of S and are an inappropriate target
>for the rath of ARSers.

    If Diane says she was mistreated and kicked off AOL without
    notice or reason, we would tend to believe her.  She always
    backs up her words and opinions with something of substance.

    You, on the other hand, are an agent of OSA.  It is KorreenB
    and your job to set up and run those AOL groups in order to 
    snare unsuspecting net newbies into being bodies in your 
    brainwashing shop.  Your dual stat is # of groups started and 
    number of posts on them.  
    
    You're trying sell air here on ars.  Trying  to deceive ars 
    readers into believing Diane violated the TOS by your lying.

    This is real internet.  It eats bs artists like you and
    ConArtist for breakfast and doesn't even need to pick its
    teeth after.   
    
    Run away!

>Unfortunately I suspect that with the double-think that goes on around
>here
>some may conclude that because I say AOL is okay it must really
>be bad. Well I tried.

    AOL seemed already to be regarded by net.veterens as a total
    joke internet provider.  Only those who don't know better, ie
    clueless newbys, would use it as their sole provider.  (or
    soul provider, for that matter)

    Still AOL and Prodigy (who shamelessly stole my Crosstown Bus
    to Toad'l Freedom[tm] concept for their new ad campaign!)
    have the big advertising budgets.  That seems to be all it
    takes to rip the public off or get away with murder or child
    abuse in America these days.

>With regards to your getting TOSed, I suggest readers look over the AOL
>terms of service and knowing your intentions, decide for themselves if
>there
>is any way in hell you could have participated in a Scientology Forum
>without being in violation of TOS.

    F*ck you.  
    
    You and your brainwashed, zombified scieno readers do not 
    decide who gets to speak and who doesn't out here in the
    real world.

    The wogs won't eat up that sh*t like your bodies in the shop
    will.  Get used to it.

>One thing I will concede ARS is very guilty of is very inadequate
>quoting software.  Hope you all appreciate what a pain in the butt it is
>to come up with all the >>>>>>>>s  in the right places when posting
>from AOL..

    Oh look, he can point out something bad about AOL.  Just like
    a real cognizent person.  Now tell us something, anything
    wrong with scientology.

>Pilot

    Gwan, widja. 
    
            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
      dennis.l.erlich@support.com  +  inForm@primenet.com
                           "tar baby"