Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com Subject: RE: more scientology questions Message-ID: <9510041403.0JR9B01@support.com> References: <9510041842.AA13197@next.ocsg.com> Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150 X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35 Distribution: world Date: Wed, 04 Oct 95 14:03:49 -0700 Lines: 216 Tim Schmitt >Dennis, > > I hope you don't mind - I have a new batch of questions. Not at all, Tim. That, after all, is what I was trained for 15 years in the kult to do. >Your answers are quit informative, and I learn a lot from them. I'm glad to hear that. >If you have the time, I look forward to your responce. > As before, feel free to post to ars. Great. I hate saying the same thing over and over. > 1) What is this "Bridge" that's so sacred? When a scieno speaks of "the bridge" he is talking about all of Phatso's Tek Droppings. It is the tek that takes people from keyed-in, restimulated, dramatizing pre-programmed raw meat robots, all the way up to gods who can transcend the laws of the physical universe. It is the step-by-step ladder, if you will, that one climbs on Phatso's Tower of Babel. It takes one from raw meat to godhood (Operating Thetan). It's the only way out of the trap that all humans are in, according to the scienos. > Why would Scientologists be so upset about it's release? It exposes the truth about what kind of fraudulent crap they actually are selling to the public, under the protection afforded to real religions. > After all, other sacred documents have >also been released without causing upheval. It's like when Michael Jackson got the rights to all the Beatles songs. Only the scienos are not selling anything remotely resembling harmony. They are selling delusion and deceit. They *don't* want their vicious, ugly little scam exposed. Once the fraud is revealed to the public at large, the scieno's golden goose is dead. > 2) How is the FOIA suit going against the IRS to get information >on Scientology under section 6104? I don't know. But FOIA litigation was pioneered by the scienos, in trying to find out what federal law enforcement was up to in the 70's and 80's. In the judicial system if FOIA is virtually synonymous with the scienos. It was only because the scienos could't wait to get the data legally, that they infiltrated the FBI, IRS, Treasury, etc. in the Snow White Operation that landed Tubby's wife and a bunch of other Orifice Types in Federal penitentiary. >Is the IRS still defending >their classification of Scientology as Tax Exempt, I think so, yes. >or is there >are real chance of de-classification? If people care enough to complain, I'm sure that rock can be kicked over and some slimy creatures will crawl out into the sunshine. > 3) What is Wollershiem doing with the money that Scientology >had to pay out to him? Waiting for it to be paid. The scienos have turned the entity Wollersheim sued, Church of Scientology of California (the former Mother Church for all the others world-wide) into an asset stripped shell. "Not one thin dime for Wollersheim!" has been a scieno chant in meetings for years. They're playing 3-card monty with Larry's money. > 4) Do you think Scientology will start to wise up and >change it's tactics against the net? They will never willingly answer for or take responsibility for what they have done, both to the (and I say this word only for those who believed it was a religion) church, to the believers and to the public. It will require the force of law to make them behave. Then they'll say, "Oh, we really didn't understand you. We were trying to be good. We got rid of the people who lead us astray." So no. Their actions are bound by policy. It can not be changed. It can not be interpreted. It can only be followed exactly. They will run like lemmings off the cliff of their own delusory Oat Tea causation. >The more they push against the net, the more they loose. According to Phatso, this is not supposed to happpen. It means someone is not applying his Droppings correctly. Time for the Cramming Officer to step in, find the who and the why , cram everone involved in the Hill 10 on the relevant Droppings, and programm the situation for a handling . So they are always correcting themselves, but only using more of what's making them deluded in the first place: Scieno Droppings. >Will they keep on >pushing themselves into oblivion, or will their looses >eventually reach a point that forces them to adopt new >tactics? When the cops show up with warrants and catch them in the act, as with Snow White, they will become more covert as they did by disbanding the GO only to start the more ruthless Orifice of Special Affairs. > 5) Is the membership of Scientology shrinking or growing? \ \ \ \ Downstats, all of them. > 6) What is Scientology's current financial status? Illegal and barratrous actions are supported by the American taxpayer by reason of secret deals made with the criminals. > Are all >of their lawsuits starting to take its tool on the bottom line, >or does Scientology have money to burn? The local orgs are starving and can barely keep their utilities and rent paid. Money is only supposed to flow in one direction in the cult: "Up Lines". The agerage staff member is working for nothing while poodleboy and his OSA cronies pay the big bucks to lawyers to silence criticism. > 7) How many people have reached OT8? Hundreds? Thousands? Couple of thousand. Who could afford the $300K pricetag? > 8) At what level does someone become "clear"? At any level he has the clear cog: "I am creating my reactive mind." (Well duh.) Get the guy to create it in his imagination and then sell him the cure. What a scam! Blue sky, fer sure. > 9) This may be a strange question, but was Hubbard happy? He was constantly scraming obsenities at his bungling staff who were to blame for everything going wrong in his life. His clothes were never clean enough. The air was never dust-free enough. The auditor was never good enough. His food was never prepared right. >What Hubbard content with his quality of life? Was he? He had thousands of willing slaves that adored him. I sure think he got off in it in a toadly sick way. > 10) Has anyone contacted Hubbard's wife and ask her what >her current views on Scientology are? She's being kept incommunicato by poodleboy. >What does she do for a living? Collects payments for Tubbys Droppings. Stays out of poodleboy's way. > 11) Can you speculate on what personally motivates Miscavage? Power. He's a classic Power-Tripper, trained by one of the all-time worst. >What rewards does this guy get that makes him get out of bed >each morning and lead Scientology for another day? The thrill of wielding toad'l control over other people's lives. >Is it addiction to power or wealth? Bingo. > 12) Can you predict what's going to happen to the Scientology >Org within the medium range future, 1-3 years from now? Will >the law/IRS come down and shake it up, will their be an >internal erruption, or will it continue to prod along its >nefarious ways, sucking in innocent souls? It depends on whether free speech is discouraged on internet, I believe. If it is not encouraged, the scienos will continue as they have, sucking good people's spiritual blood to stay "alive". > Tim +--------------------------------------+ Rev. Dennis L Erlich * * the inFormer * * dennis.l.erlich@support.com + inForm@primenet.com "tar baby"